It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Serious 9/11 Arguments Compilation.

page: 73
29
<< 70  71  72   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 25 2018 @ 08:25 AM
link   
a reply to: Jesushere

Again....

Again, why would breaking steel floor connections make large amounts of dust? Again, example after example has been provided that the most dust created is either from the detonation of explosives, when the floor system impacts the ground, or when the building hits the ground.

Sorry, you failed to make your case again. Especially in the sense of supposed CD and that WTC 7 had no traps to catch ejected materials from detonations.

Nice when you debunk yourself.


Then post a video of a collapsing building from something other than the WTC creating largest amounts of dust mid collapse without explosives.




posted on Nov, 25 2018 @ 08:25 AM
link   
a reply to: Jesushere

Sad you cannot see you debunk your own narratives.



posted on Nov, 25 2018 @ 08:27 AM
link   
neutronflux NIST is claiming entire floors are collapsing not just steel supports before the full collapse.



posted on Nov, 25 2018 @ 08:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: Jesushere
neutronflux NIST is claiming entire floors are collapsing not just steel supports before the full collapse.


Again
Again....

Again, why would breaking steel floor connections make large amounts of dust? Again, example after example has been provided that the most dust created is either from the detonation of explosives, when the floor system impacts the ground, or when the building hits the ground.

Sorry, you failed to make your case again. Especially in the sense of supposed CD and that WTC 7 had no traps to catch ejected materials from detonations.

Nice when you debunk yourself.

Then post a video of a collapsing building from something other than the WTC creating largest amounts of dust mid collapse without explosives.



posted on Nov, 25 2018 @ 09:26 AM
link   
You are dumb are just too delusional to deal with.

It was not just steel collapsing. Floors with stuff in them came down as well prior to collapse. Do you think a floor collapsing does not result in a dust plume really truly Jesus? Imagine 47 floors came down.



posted on Nov, 25 2018 @ 09:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: Jesushere
You are dumb are just too delusional to deal with.

It was not just steel collapsing. Floors with stuff in them came down as well prior to collapse. Do you think a floor collapsing does not result in a dust plume really truly Jesus? Imagine 47 floors came down.


Then post a video of a collapsing building from something other than the WTC creating largest amounts of dust mid collapse without explosives.



posted on Nov, 25 2018 @ 09:49 AM
link   
a reply to: Jesushere

Again, the video of the “Nigerian church building collapse” in the link below.

A structural failure collapse that really did no create much dust until the floor and building hit the ground.



A building collapse at The Synagogue Church of All Nations (Scoan) in Nigeria, which killed 67 South Africans, was not the first, according to information on the church’s website.

citizen.co.za...




posted on Nov, 25 2018 @ 03:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Jesushere

you


You think 47 entire floors collapsing inside WTC7 would not produce dust plumes and rocketing debris in every direction?


Not if it was an east to west progressive collapse that was slow enough not to have to push air out like the towers where air of an entire floor was expelled in a fraction of a second.

And the buckling was lower in WTC 7 so the interior fell with resistance only met near the ground. Where video after video was posted as examples of structural collapse showing the greatest creator of dust is when the floors/building strike the ground. Vs where a 11 or 29 story hammer was smashing through each floor below as in the twin towers.

Again, you are confusing what should be the ejection of material if explosions were cutting the steel columns. Especially in the sense there was no traps set up in WTC 7 to capture ejected material from the supposed explosions like a normal demolitions implosion.



Katie Bender's family commemorate 20 years since Royal Canberra Hospital implosion

www.google.com... %2Fact%2Fkatie-benders-family-commemorate-20-years-since-royal-canberra-hospital-implosion-20170712-gx9k9m.html&psig=AOvVaw0FwqDE8Vj3bk5Qm3pqO0RX&ust= 1543267231837996

The public's attendance was encouraged by the then ACT Liberal Government. Katie was standing more than 400m away from the explosion but killed instantly when she was hit by a piece of flying steel.

Break

Seconds after the explosion on that Sunday afternoon, Katie was was killed instantly by a steel fragment sent flying from 430 metres across the lake. It was thought to be travelling at 140km/h.




Canberra Hospital Implosion 1997
m.youtube.com...



Couple Nearly Killed By A Flying Rock From Building Demolition
m.youtube.com...


Tough day for you. Usually you just contradict yourself. But between two threads, you got caught posting at least two obvious false statements. And you keep debunking your own WTC 7 dust argument.


edit on 25-11-2018 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed

edit on 25-11-2018 by neutronflux because: Fixed more



posted on Nov, 25 2018 @ 06:41 PM
link   
a reply to: Jesushere

Well, good luck to ya. I keep getting redirected by popup adds, making ATS unusable for me. And using an Ad Blocker is a serious terms violation?

Sorry that ATS has ended up more annoying than a clickbait site.







 
29
<< 70  71  72   >>

log in

join