It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Serious 9/11 Arguments Compilation.

page: 68
29
<< 65  66  67    69  70  71 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 31 2018 @ 07:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Bernardo1871



extreme security for ground zero steel shipments consistent with limiting access to radioactive steel


Again you claimed


inability to quench ground zero heat with wateR


How did they ship it anywhere if it could not be cooled.

And where did all the contaminated water at ground zero go.




posted on Oct, 31 2018 @ 07:38 PM
link   
a reply to: Bernardo1871



extreme pulverization of WTC concrete into very fine particles


How did a underground blast made to cause the core to drop pulverized concrete with no visible above ground shockwave?



posted on Oct, 31 2018 @ 07:39 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

i've already shared that. you don't read, you don't care, all you can do is to ask questions which cannot be answered because no one knows exactly what was the nature of the nuke!
why? because the people don't know the nukes used.

well, Sandia Lab knows enough.
and the Department of Energy.
both wrote a classified report regarding what actually happened on september 11, 2001.
where is that report? it's classified, above top secret! :-)

but we do know that Sandia Lab has come to Nuked York City on september 11, 2001' afternoon! the very same day, in the afternoon! why? you don't care, remember, you can only accept that steel beams melted jetfuel! :-)



posted on Oct, 31 2018 @ 07:44 PM
link   
a reply to: Bernardo1871



extreme security at ground zero, limiting exposure, view of devastation




WTC1 'Collapse' and Ground Zero raw footage - Sauret
m.youtube.com...

September 11, 2001 World Trade Center aftermath raw stock footage Part 3 PublicDomainFootage.com
m.youtube.com...

GROUND ZERO Two Months after 9/11 World Trade Center
m.youtube.com...

World trade center 1 Please Do not watch if this subject bothers you
m.youtube.com...

World Trade Center VSC timelapse of excavation
m.youtube.com...

WTC Steel Columns Cut at Angles During 9/11 Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths
m.youtube.com...




posted on Oct, 31 2018 @ 07:47 PM
link   
a reply to: Bernardo1871



disappearance of over one thousand human bodies from WTC debris


How from a supposed underground blast with no evidence of a shockwave.
edit on 31-10-2018 by neutronflux because: Fixed



posted on Oct, 31 2018 @ 07:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Bernardo1871



disappearance of furniture, phones, filing cabinets and computers from WTC debris


One, show there was ever enough heat to vaporize anything.

Two, what do you think happens to combustible items in a fire.

Three, what do you think happens to those items when ground up in a collapse of 500,000 tons building?

Four, what do you think happens to those items after a fire, ground on by 500,000 tons of collapsing building trapped in a smothering toxic soup for up to three months.

Five, somehow filling cabinets vaporized? But you cannot provide one picture of a column that shows signs of reaching the melting point then solidifying.
edit on 31-10-2018 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed



posted on Oct, 31 2018 @ 08:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Bernardo1871



several floor fragments fused together in “meteorite” object


The toxic soup from all the cooling water and burnt plastics resulted in chemical attacks that formed chemical compounds with lower melting points than steel.



posted on Oct, 31 2018 @ 08:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Bernardo1871



bone fragments sprayed into Bankers Trust upper floor during destruction


What is supposed to happen when a 500,000 ton building falls onto a 200 pound person? When people are trapped in a building 110 floors collapsing. Please research rod mills.
edit on 31-10-2018 by neutronflux because: Fixed more



posted on Oct, 31 2018 @ 08:07 PM
link   
a reply to: Bernardo1871



multiple blast waves during destruction of tower


Did you state the collapse was from a underground nuke. Please cite video of an initial shockwave. Why would they be multiple shockwaves. Pleae cite video of a shockwave that had the power to turn core columns to dust.

There is no shockwaves visible on the collapse initiation of WTC 1, 2, and 7.



posted on Oct, 31 2018 @ 08:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Bernardo1871



large fireballs during initiation of WTC1 destructio


How is that evidence of a nuclear reaction.

What was supposed to happen when the collapsing floor systems pushed out flames and hot gasses into a fresh supply of oxygen?



posted on Oct, 31 2018 @ 08:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Bernardo1871

How do


small backpack-sized fission nukes exist


Have enough material to cause nuclear reactions that


heat generation at ground zero for six months (china syndrome)

inability to quench ground zero heat with water


They don’t. It is impossible. You contradict your own fantasy.



posted on Oct, 31 2018 @ 08:14 PM
link   
a reply to: Bernardo1871



fission-nuke technology well-establishe



Have to do with anything that actually happen at the WTC. Not you falsehoods.



posted on Oct, 31 2018 @ 08:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Bernardo1871



fission-nuke technology well-establishe


Have to do with anything that actually happen at the WTC. Not you falsehoods.
edit on 31-10-2018 by neutronflux because: Fixed quotes

edit on 31-10-2018 by neutronflux because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 31 2018 @ 08:21 PM
link   
a reply to: Bernardo1871



low efficiency of fission nukes ensures leftover radioactive fragments and China syndrom


How, the amount of material and rate of nuclear reactions determines heat generated. For a nuclear reactor, like fissions per minute.

How would a mini nuke have the ability to heat 1,000,000 tons of rubble for months. It’s doesn’t have enough material to create enough radioactive reactions.

edit on 31-10-2018 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed



posted on Oct, 31 2018 @ 08:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Bernardo1871

By the way, China syndrome is where a reactor cannot stop its fission of plutonium or uranium.

What fission products after the detonation of a nuclear bomb are going to result in nuclear reactions that would cause a China syndrome like event? What decay of fission products from a nuclear detonation would allow 70 pounds of bomb grade nuclear material to heat 1,000,000 tons of rubble to the point it could not be quenched. With no massive amounts of contaminated water. With no resultant deaths within hours of being near a source that could heat 1,000,000 tons of rubble smoldering hot by nuclear reactions.

Your whole nuke theory is a big delusion. Based only on pseudoscience and falsehoods.



posted on Oct, 31 2018 @ 09:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Bernardo1871

How do you go from this


imagine if a radiological cleanup had started right on september 11, 2001's afternoon?


To
This


1) heat generation at ground zero for six months (china syndrome)
2) inability to quench ground zero heat with water


If the WTC stayed hot from the “China syndrome” for “six months” what the hell was cleaned up.

Where did the contaminated water go from the spraying of steel so contaminated that it would not be quenched like Fukushima?

It’s fun to see you make nonsensical contradictions that kills your own credibility.

Again, the only things you offer are right out falsehoods, contradictions, and pseudoscience.

There is zero evidence of nuclear reactions at the WTC that caused the collapse of buildings. There is zero evidence of a shockwave at the WTC that had the power to cut steel.

Nuclear devices do no explain the inward bowing and buckling that initiated the collapse of WTC 2.

It’s funny to see you rant like a flat earther.
edit on 31-10-2018 by neutronflux because: Fixed and added



posted on Nov, 1 2018 @ 04:13 AM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

don't play the dummy. the radiological cleanup did happen, in order to prevent the radiological contamination. yet, it was not enough to make radiological elements to disappear.

too complicated. stick with steel beams did melt jetfuel.

nonsensical contradictions according to you, because of course, you definitely don't want to admit you have been deceived for so many years! :-)

i don't care what you 'think' about the facts, only the facts matter. pity that you are unable to answer to the facts, like the hot spots at Ground Zero for months! :-)

Ground Zero, oxford dictionary: The point on the earth's surface directly above or below an exploding nuclear bomb.
en.oxforddictionaries.com...

another coincidence in the wall of cognitive dissonance of the slaves! :-)



posted on Nov, 1 2018 @ 06:18 AM
link   
a reply to: Bernardo1871



don't play the dummy. the radiological cleanup did happen, in order to prevent the radiological contamination. yet, it was not enough to make radiological elements to disappear.


When? If somehow your junk science that decay of fission products from a 60 pound mass of fissionable material impossibly kept 1,000,000 tons of rubble smoldering for months. Where the steel was so contaminated that it couldn’t be quenched.

Where did all that Fukushima levels of radiation and contamination go. Which would be impossible to generate from a mini nuke.

It’s funny to see you debunked your own fantasies with pseudoscience, contradictions, and ignorance.



posted on Nov, 1 2018 @ 06:20 AM
link   
a reply to: Bernardo1871

If the radiation levels were so great as to create enough heat that the rubble could not be quenched, how would anyone even live long enough to approach the site, much less clean it up, and gather the contamination to be removed.

How is the cleanup of Fukushima going!

Your such a hack.
edit on 1-11-2018 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed



posted on Nov, 1 2018 @ 06:26 AM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

as said rightfully another conspiracy nuts,

you demand proof then refuse to look at.

Who do you think you are fooling?

Don't expect me to waste anymore time with you.

i'm willing to answer only to people who are really sceptic and able to change their mind, i've done due to new informations.

informations that you dare to deny.




top topics



 
29
<< 65  66  67    69  70  71 >>

log in

join