It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: namehere
a reply to: TrueBrit
we have abandoned nothing, we just decided on a more effective strategy to reduce pollution which will benefit everyone more than some worthless tax scheme ever will, without destroying traditional carbon based industry.
sometimes you gotta be patient to resolve problems otherwise there will be disastrous future consequences, those ipcc numbers are just scare tactics designed to benefit the growing "green" technology industry, they are only trying to destroy the competition with propaganda, distorted half-truths and exaggerated information.
the same thing happened when the first two industrial revolutions came about with new technologies, this is the third industrial revolution and this revolution is between carbon green technology and non-carbon green technology.
i'd trust the ams more than some controlled governmental organization created specifically to publish information to support a specific agenda, you all can fall for it but why should we have to follow along like sheep, we'll deal with it just fine and hell even with our recently loosened regulations we still have the strictest environmental regulations of any nation in the world.
originally posted by: notsure1
originally posted by: manuelram16
Bad News?, let me get this right...
in the 70s they told us were headed to an 'Ice Age'
in the 90s they changed it to 'Global Warming'
in the 00s now they say 'Climate Change'
so for the 20s I suggest we tell them 'GTH'
Dont forget the gigantic hole in the Ozone layer that was supposed to kill us all by now...
back in the 80s and early 90s women stopped using hair spray , and they made it illegal to put Freon in your own car.
We never learn that all they ever do is lie ...
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: network dude
97% of all climate scientists are now smoking, driving SUV's, using hair spray.
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: network dude
In 1975 a law was passed to force car companies to use a Catalytic converter. That law just by itself has stopped tons of pollutants from entering our atmosphere.
That's just one off the top of my head.
The others are well documented but your going to have to find that out for yourself. You wont learn as much if I do the research work for you.
My guess is you will never try and find an answer to your question.
And yes we did pass the 400ppm and our temperatures have in fact been rising . Good thing we have been doing so much to slow it down or else it would already be to hot for you to deny it's happening. Hopefully we continue to change our ways so that people like you can go to their graves never experiencing climate change that would cause you to change your mind.
And carbon is directly related to temperature as we have been taught
If you don't believe that carbon dioxide has anything to do with temperature could you please explain to me in detail how a green house works?
The enviroment was different in the 70s. We had acid rain, heavy polutions.
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: ManFromEurope
The endgame is simple common sense.
Free market economics.
Meaning when alternative energy is cheap like the king fossil fuel, and when the alternative energy tax gets created like the gas tax.
The people will be ready.
Destroying one business in favor of a another doesn't hunt.
What's more.
Live by that the word LIBERAL means, and by that.
If a person buys a piece of land, and pay for it's loans and property taxes,
Neither YOU or the state has any GD right to tell them what they can do with it.
In other words freedom from the tyrannical church of climatology.
originally posted by: neo96
Speaking of diesel.
We have the church of climatology to thank for DEF.
Diesel Exhaust fluid.
More cost to own.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: TrueBrit
Hmmm... Wow... a nation taken over by a basically fascist ideologue with connections to people within the fossil fuel industry, whose policy writers on the subject of energy policy are people who used to literally run oil firms, lead by a man who cares nothing for the environment, and has made his position on that clear by recommending a tonne of cuts to the EPA, as well as other related bodies, has a Meteorological Association, whose findings argue with the larger, and more qualified body that is the IPCC?
Good God, man! There's this thing called a 'period' you know... lemme see if I can break this down...
Hmmm... Wow... a nation taken over by a basically fascist ideologue...
Wikipedia
Fascism is a form of radical authoritarian nationalism, characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition and control of industry and commerce, which came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe.
That sounds more like what the present populist movement is fighting rather than what it is. Not sure what that has to do with the study, though... I guess it just sounded good?
...with connections to people within the fossil fuel industry...
... which is why you guys on the little rock in the middle of the ocean have 'petrol' for your cars. I suppose anyone who studies science must live in a cave and do their studying by torchlight...
...whose policy writers on the subject of energy policy are people who used to literally run oil firms...
Please point out where a writer of this report used to run an oil firm?
...lead by a man who cares nothing for the environment...
I think Trump does care for the environment... maybe not environmentalists though...
...and has made his position on that clear by recommending a tonne of cuts to the EPA, as well as other related bodies
Ah! I get it! Bureaucratic waste is good for the environment!
...has a Meteorological Association, whose findings argue with the larger, and more qualified body that is the IPCC?
What was that definition of fascism again? Oh, yes...
Fascism is a form of radical authoritarian nationalism, characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition and control of industry and commerce, which came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe.
So all we have to do to stop fascism is suppress research that disagrees with the authoritarian power known as the IPCC?
Fight fascism with fascism? Even though the fascism you're fighting with fascism is the opposite of fascism?
That's just the first paragraph... and I think I've made my point. That point, by the way, is that your points are nothing more than wild accusations made in some sort of hysteria-fueled rage at what you don't understand being debated against your religious views. I call that...
Hubristic bloody nonsense.
Well, whadaya know? You managed to get three words right out of all that after all. Good show, old chap!
TheRedneck