DOJ Will Turn Over Thousands of New FBI Texts Between Strzok and Page … Next 24 Hours

a reply to: scraedtosleep

And no person is perfect. What is this thread? Human Nature 101?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

They were lateral moves.

Senior counter-intel agent at the Bureau to working a desk in HR is quite the lateral move.

a reply to: carewemust

IDK? It's xuen thread. His threads are always crazy.

obama , hillary, and trump are not perfect that is for damn sure.
Does it mean we should go easy on them when they do something wrong?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: The GUT

Cooperating? They still work for the FBI. I would hope so. Lol.
Cooperating... Like how?

As witnesses in criminal referrals from OIG Horowitz to Prosecutor Huber.

After McCabe tried to leave Page vulnerable to his leaking that he lied about, it appears Page turned over all her emails. All the emails between Strzok and Page we've seen so far originated with her as the inbox recipient.

If the "recovered" emails that are supposed to be given to Congress soon also come from Page as the inbox recipient that would be pretty conclusive because we would have a good idea that they were turned over by Page herself.

Bruce Ohr still has a job, too, even though he's been demoted twice. We know he gave testimony to someone other than Congress because his comments about Steele having an animus towards President Trump have turned up in official reports. This suggests he has given testimony to Horowitz at least and probably Huber as well.

In addition it's also known that Nellie Ohr has turned over all of her "opposition research" suggesting an ongoing criminal investigation and cooperation.

a reply to: The GUT

very interesting, things are beginning to proceed more rapidly

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

A few things you or the article got wrong.

Strzok & Page are the two FBI agents caught slandering Trump and they WERE working with SP Mueller !!

1) Robert Mueller is a special counsel not a special prosecutor.

Both defrocked FBI executives were demoted after a few hundred text messages were released between the duo

2) Neither Strozk nor Page were demoted.

Of course, the partisan duo who previously worked on U.S. Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Trump Russia probe, made glowing references to Hillary Clinton

3) They were equally critical of Clinton as trump

For a start...

2) Neither Strozk nor Page were demoted.


You are so dead wrong........pardon me but your ignorance is showing....again.


A lateral move in the FBI to a dead end job is well known as a demotion. It is a career killer.


I know this for a FACT.

Stop trying to equate pay grade with demotion.


EDIT: The government CAN'T laterally move you to a lower pay grade....doesn't happen unless the employee agrees to it.

If we find out the depths of their "insurance policy" included assassination of the sitting president, how would that effect your perception of the FBI? What about the DOJ and State Dept?

I'd love to see some replies here, before the truth comes out and all you lefties are forced to concede that your support for evil needs to end.

According to Devin Nunes, the Strzok-Page text messages were transferred from the DOJ to the State Department for "scrubbing" Thursday evening. By the time the texts get to Nunes and Mark Meadows, who knows how much of their content will be redacted. And why is the State Department involved?

Anyway, here's the source article: theconservativetreehouse.com...

a reply to: carewemust

And why is the State Department involved?

That is a very good question.
Neither of those 2 worked for the state department, did they?

Classified info related to State, maybe?

a reply to: RadioRobert

They were passing classified information from the state department by text message to each other?

That sounds silly.

a reply to: xuenchen

Oops...
Maybe they mean 48 hours. Or 72 hours.

a reply to: RadioRobert

Responsibilities are different rank and pay grade are not.

a reply to: The GUT

Says who? More sources? Or you're just throwing it out there?

a reply to: carewemust

And why is the State Department involved?

Low probability, but still possible:

“The order blocks the property and interests in property of persons listed in the Annex to the order. It also blocks the property and interests in property of any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:

(1) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged in, serious human rights abuse;

(2) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in:

(a) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery; or

(b) the transfer or the facilitation of the transfer of the proceeds of corruption”

Text of a Letter from the President to the Congress of the United States

originally posted by: carewemust
According to Devin Nunes, the Strzok-Page text messages were transferred from the DOJ to the State Department for "scrubbing" Thursday evening. By the time the texts get to Nunes and Mark Meadows, who knows how much of their content will be redacted. And why is the State Department involved?

Anyway, here's the source article: theconservativetreehouse.com...

Someone correct me if I'm wrong but don't they get to view them in digital form before scrubbing. Meaning they get to go to the secret room and view them on the GOV internal servers? Isn't the "scrubbing" more or less to keep info from us the tax payer?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

Oops...
Maybe they mean 48 hours. Or 72 hours.

Just because they havent been made public doesnt mean congress didnt recieve them.

Of course you would have been the first person to scream how horrible it was if they were leaked public.

SO if they dont leak, it proves the story is wrong.

If they do, its a horrible abuse.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: RadioRobert

They were passing classified information from the state department by text message to each other?

That sounds silly.

It doesn't have to originate from State for them to have some sort of stake in it. The State department does a lot of things interagency. If it outs a state dept diplomat overseas as an intelligence figure, had classified info that put partner nations in a damaging light, intl corporate information from State's CBA, State revoking passports for someone under the advice of Justice or the IC or issuing a visa at the IC's request, State working with Interpol, all those things would need/want to be reviewed by State, I assume.

All those things and plenty of others could be conceivably related State and to the investigation that those two would have knowledge of.

a reply to: RadioRobert

I looked around, but could not find anything else from this mess that had to be sent to state prior to release except for items relating to the hrc email scandal.