It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: ScepticScot
US decisions made on financial grounds by insurance companies.
An estimated 45,000 people die each year in The U.S. because they have no money for health care.
Absolutely disgusting society to live in.
Various studies have looked at whether uninsured people have a higher risk of death. The most cited was published by the American Journal of Public Health in 2009 and found that nearly 45,000 Americans die each year as a direct result of being uninsured
www.theguardian.com...
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
originally posted by: Dem0nc1eaner
Well, we do have one of the absolute best health care systems in the world and it's free to boot.
Beat that!
as long as you aren't too sick...at which point you may be starved to death because some doctors believe its not worth feeding you anymore.
UK decisions on treatment made on medical grounds by doctors.
US decisions made on financial grounds by insurance companies.
Think we will stick to our system thanks.
Uhh...no.
US decisions made by parents, so that each child has a champion fighting for him/her.
Not true in the US either. Children have rights outside of parental control. It's staggeringly ill informed to believe otherwise.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
originally posted by: Dem0nc1eaner
Well, we do have one of the absolute best health care systems in the world and it's free to boot.
Beat that!
as long as you aren't too sick...at which point you may be starved to death because some doctors believe its not worth feeding you anymore.
UK decisions on treatment made on medical grounds by doctors.
US decisions made on financial grounds by insurance companies.
Think we will stick to our system thanks.
Uhh...no.
US decisions made by parents, so that each child has a champion fighting for him/her.
Not true in the US either. Children have rights outside of parental control. It's staggeringly ill informed to believe otherwise.
The key difference: in the US the courts would only step in if the parents are refusing to have their child treated. Courts do not force parents to let their children die.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
There is no alternative treatment. The options in Italy are the exact same as the options in the UK.
The only question is it in his interest to continue treatment or not. The courts after listening to the evidence of the multiple doctors who examined him, including doctors from the Italian hospital, concluded it wasn't.
But of course people reading about it online know better...
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
originally posted by: Dem0nc1eaner
Well, we do have one of the absolute best health care systems in the world and it's free to boot.
Beat that!
as long as you aren't too sick...at which point you may be starved to death because some doctors believe its not worth feeding you anymore.
UK decisions on treatment made on medical grounds by doctors.
US decisions made on financial grounds by insurance companies.
Think we will stick to our system thanks.
Uhh...no.
US decisions made by parents, so that each child has a champion fighting for him/her.
Not true in the US either. Children have rights outside of parental control. It's staggeringly ill informed to believe otherwise.
The key difference: in the US the courts would only step in if the parents are refusing to have their child treated. Courts do not force parents to let their children die.
So if a parent was insisting on treatment that had no hope of success and would cause pain to the child that would be OK?
originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
Yes, they are indeed open to discussion. But vitriolic attacks based on ignorance? No thanks.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
Perhaps your wife needs to research the actual facts and not stories?
No. We value life.
originally posted by: sapien82
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
Perhaps your wife needs to research the actual facts and not stories?
No. We value life.
Could have fooled me !
originally posted by: eletheia
originally posted by: ScepticScot
There is no alternative treatment. The options in Italy are the exact same as the options in the UK.
Thank you for your reply..... My reply would have been very similar to yours.
The only question is it in his interest to continue treatment or not. The courts after listening to the evidence of the multiple doctors who examined him, including doctors from the Italian hospital, concluded it wasn't.
Its been said SO MANY times on this thread.... "The courts after listening to the
evidence of the multiple doctors who have examined him. So I fail
to understand WHY the government keeps getting dragged in!!!???
But of course people reading about it online know better...
They always think they do.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
originally posted by: Dem0nc1eaner
Well, we do have one of the absolute best health care systems in the world and it's free to boot.
Beat that!
as long as you aren't too sick...at which point you may be starved to death because some doctors believe its not worth feeding you anymore.
UK decisions on treatment made on medical grounds by doctors.
US decisions made on financial grounds by insurance companies.
Think we will stick to our system thanks.
Uhh...no.
US decisions made by parents, so that each child has a champion fighting for him/her.
Not true in the US either. Children have rights outside of parental control. It's staggeringly ill informed to believe otherwise.
The key difference: in the US the courts would only step in if the parents are refusing to have their child treated. Courts do not force parents to let their children die.
So if a parent was insisting on treatment that had no hope of success and would cause pain to the child that would be OK?
are you telling me that feeding a child is "painful treatment"?
originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
Did I mention you personally?
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
are you telling me that feeding a child is "painful treatment"?
originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
Well instead of complaining about The U.K. system, spend your energy on putting your own house in order first.