a reply to: verschickter
One of the few college courses I took was a hypnotism class by an ex army contractor that performed his profession for the army during the cold
My first day I asked him what techniques could I teach myself to combat being hypnotised.
I then became a blip on that guys radar. It was strange for the rest of the course.
There was an officer, dont know what branch but you could tell he was military, and not regular military. The professor and this guy immediately
started insider talking about things on day one and singled out certain students that could not be let into the circle. I was one.lol
The professor chose this guy and a few others to study the rest of us while we were taking a class about hypnotism. Really we were being programmed to
see who was REALLY susceptible to hypnotism and they were gaining insight on what personality types are better suited for hypnotism.
I am convinced the professor was running a side experiment on us. There were all sorts of cues that the class was falling for.
So maybe a song would come on in a video we were watching and everyone starts bopping their feet to it after the professor cues them verbally or with
a quick gesture... He and I would make eye contact and the fact that I wasnt bopping along would stand out.
He liked to think that I wanted to stand out by my failures. He said so to the military man. I was just in war mode because he was programming us and
I came with the intent of learning effective countermeasures to hypnotism.
Only those who accepted the programming would pass from what I could tell.
I mention all this because I noticed that the OP was familiar with hypnotism like you alluded to. Either by training or by exposure. I suspect we saw
the same choice of words and reactions.
I believed her. She reminded me of my class towards the end of the course. They were actively using the professors techniques on themselves as part of
the routine. They would speak and act in a conducive manner towards the professors programming.
She reminded me of a victim after suggestive programming, not an actual handler.
The handler role given to victims to personify is used to normalize the effect of the trauma by making a victim act out against another victim. They
later think to their own actions as a "master" instead of what they feel when a "master" does the same to them. That locks it all in.
A large part of the effort is to populate these groups with former victims. The victims that accept the programming become the next generation of
I think that is why we picked up on her ability to fit into that role. She was probably closer to the end of the "training", turned out to not be a
devoted and dependable handler, so they used her to test measures they will employ on victims that manage to resist their programming.
Who knows, but that wasnt a typical ATS troll thread. I think that in the future, we should expect more of these people to come out and seek a witness
to their lived horrors.
More are resisting, breaking free, and getting ridiculed. I guess the people behind this cant just kill them all. Life is not a movie.
They may be mostly small and unconnected groups that share insight and some resources at specific times when its safe to meet up.
I think, they are all isolated cells so one cant be linked to another....so if they dont do something, maybe that group is weak and they never will do
They all pretend to be connected and untouchable to their victims. Some groups may be, most are small and limited in their resources and survivability
from what I can tell.
One victim could in theory, kill or have arrested the entire group in their local area and the other groups may never even know.
IMO, They dont just call each other from one group to another. There may be exceptions and special occasions, but they are so scared of getting caught
when they arent in the act that they probably just hide from everything and everyone.
edit on 4 23 2018 by tadaman because: (no reason given)