It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by edsinger
Oh I know they are changing very rapidly indeed, I just ask for some restraint in what types, in that I mean force multipliers. Let me give you an example....
The AWACS the Israelis were selling them, this is a destabilizer in the region in a sense.
Yes the US has also shown restraint, let me give you another example, the Russians sold them Sovermeny DDG's, deadly warships indeed but nothing the US Navy can not handle.
The Taiwan government then asked for a AEGIS warship and we declined and gave them some KIDD class DDG's instead. That way there was no shift in the balance of power.
As things stand right now the Chinese can not take Taiwan, but that could change with the sell of advanced systems such as ASTER from the Europeans.
Restraint can avoid undo tensions and one side thinking that they could actually do it, I will mention Argentina here as a case in point.
Restraint.........Sell them Challengers? why would they need them? they want the electronic systems and EW warfare items, not tanks they build their own.
Originally posted by devilwasp
Challangers are regarded as one of top tanks in the world, and best armoured in the world. Who wouldnt want a tank with many advanced features in it?
Originally posted by edsinger
They already make their own, it is called a T-90 or something read about in this here forum even....
No, it is a bad idea to make them gain a better edge until the quiet down over the Spratleys and Taiwan.
Originally posted by devilwasp
Btw they are not communist, opposite end of the spectrum in overall management....
Originally posted by edsinger
What? uh ok......I didnt know they wernt communist....geez they must be ready for elections then.
As for the military, just say it, you want to make money. It would be like the US Government selling sophisticated weapons to Argentina while your fleet was sailing south in 1982.....
Originally posted by devilwasp
No there is no comunist countries in existance, since IMO comunism means no countries (since they do provoke segregation) and they kill people, not comunist.They say its comunism because its damm easy to manipulate and most people twist it to suite their purpose.
Originally posted by devilwasp
Ah but the UK and the US are not at war, besides you should look on your own door step....boeing....they sell the latest aerodynamics and tech to china......
Originally posted by edsinger
You don't get it, yes China IS Communist, of this there is no doubt. They are starting capitalistic reforms but they are still communist, look at the religious persecution in that nation. If you don't think they are Communists then you need a reality check, they are the last of the big ones and they know they have to change to survive.
A 747 is far different from electronic warfare systems m8, far different. Heck you can go buy GPS stuff on the open market but it still pales in comparison to what the DoD has.........quit making excuses.
Originally posted by devilwasp
Keeping a 747 in the air isnt simple, nethier is the high tech electronics on it which probably has more electronics in it than an F-18....IHMO.
Acording to people who have served in the RN some of the tech is really old but others are quite advanced.
Originally posted by edsinger
First, do you know what communism is? Of course it is dictators, at least that is how it has manifest itself for 80+ years.
As for the 747 argument, we are selling 747's all over the world, flight is not a secret, but combat systems are...........I will leave it at that.
Originally posted by devilwasp
Yes Its what I think of the perfect unreachable goal.
Do you?
Dictators are on the right, comunism is on the left.
Originally posted by edsinger
there is a BIG difference in the technolgy in a 787 and in a Typoon for exaomple
the electronic systems are by far more complex and dangerous in the military side....
Can the Chinese use this technology in th 787 for military purposes? probably to some extent, but they have not exactly been real good at making copies...
Seems I read today that Europe is taking a second look at canceling the embargo, it seems that a little law authorizing war being passed has opened some eyes.
Originally posted by edsinger
Hell no, communism is plain evil, it sucks the life out of the individual and suppresses religion no matter which.
It does not surprise me that you find the concept intriguing, as you are still young. That will change....
Communism IS Dictatorship or at least in every place it has manifested itself.
You two crack me up, there is a BIG difference in the technolgy in a 787 and in a Typoon for exaomple, the electronic systems are by far more complex and dangerous in the military side....
Can the Chinese use this technology in th 787 for military purposes? probably to some extent, but they have not exactly been real good at making copies...
Seems I read today that Europe is taking a second look at canceling the embargo, it seems that a little law authorizing war being passed has opened some eyes.
Originally posted by rapier28
Just a new development.
The Spratley problem has being solved (hopefully) as China, Phillipines and Vietnam have recently agreed to joint-explore the field.
Originally posted by edsinger
As for the 787, let me explain something real quick, Combat systems and electronics are far and above what goes into a 787, the aeronautical engineering however is also different, 787's don't take g's, don't have to assess a combat situation, they are two different things.....
Originally posted by edsinger
Combat systems and electronics are far and above what goes into a 787
the aeronautical engineering however is also different
787's don't take g's
don't have to assess a combat situation, they are two different things.....
Originally posted by edsinger
I do not deny that it is the transfer of some technology, but nothing to far ranging from a 747-400,
As for the fabrication, you can not reverse engineer that very well.
'g'??? This 787 couldn't take 6 'g's I would think but I can be wrong.
Here is the best way I can explain it, what makes a F-22 so damn deadly? Its not the maneuverability, as the SU-37 is probably better and more maneuverable. It is the combat systems, these the Chinese don't get.
As for the Europeans selling them weapons, I think it is a bad idea. BUT you can sell them all the new large Airbuses you want without complaint.