It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
One of the the very first things that would need to be done (other than to have a Plan) to fix a broken and corrupt system is to remove the broken and corrupt parts.
Comey, Strzok, McCabe, Page, Baker, Rybicki, Yates, Laufman, McCord, Ohr, Kortan, Carlin; go look these names up and see what they all have in common. You might also want to take a look at the list of members of congress who are not going to be seeking reelection.
Next, how do you overcome that huge mental inertia I spoke about previously?
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
I would say that 80% of followers are doing 20% searching and 80% parroting at present. Hence why it's good that not too many answers are being found before Future proves Past. People will evolve to looking for more themselves over time.
originally posted by: CoramDeo
I said I didn't see them, not that they didn't exist.
Please don't put words in my mouth, or twist what I'm saying.
I noticed that you ignored my refutation that Q said the whole net would be shut down.
originally posted by: Skyfloating
Gee, I wonder why John Legend is so worried about Kanye West supporting Trump.
originally posted by: daskakik
originally posted by: CoramDeo
I said I didn't see them, not that they didn't exist.
Please don't put words in my mouth, or twist what I'm saying.
I wasn't talking about what you saw. I said that Q claiming there were many. They could not make that claim unless "they" had seen them.
I noticed that you ignored my refutation that Q said the whole net would be shut down.
I didn't, I said that since the pic never surfaced that not only was the net not down but nothing needed to be censored at all.
originally posted by: fiverx313
originally posted by: Skyfloating
Gee, I wonder why John Legend is so worried about Kanye West supporting Trump.
all right, let me try that again.
you are presenting extremely flimsy circumstantial 'evidence' as if it is definitive proof of some sort of unsavory involvement in a pedo ring. i think that's extremely dangerous territory you're on with stuff like this.
if these kinds of associations were proof of anything, the chans would have been completely shut down by now for making pedobear jokes about any and everything under the sun.
i think you also have to consider what would be the mindset that leads to making jokes like that IF the person was actually involved in that kind of thing?
you're reading far too far into those inkblots, and with stuff like this you have the real potential to ruin lives with far-fetched accusations and witch hunt mentalities.
there, hopefully THAT would be considered 'on topic'.
Would I be right in thinking that in the above instance we are meant to think "Federal vs. STATE"? If so what can we infer is different in the STATE criminal system?