It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART -sIx-

page: 186
170
<< 183  184  185    187  188  189 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 3 2018 @ 06:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Perfectenemy

Press correcting themselves.

No, they are having to issue on air corrections.

They did not wiretap him and listen to his calls. Instead they have something called a pen register. They were monitoring his calls, not a full wiretap. That's a big difference.

The interesting thing is that Michael Avenatti (Stormy's lawyer) supposedly confirmed a wiretap on MSNBC ...

So now the question is - did they or didn't they? Which is the lie?


There's not a big difference. Often times even the identity of a client is protected by the attorney/client privilege. It's still a gross violation of that privilege.




posted on May, 3 2018 @ 06:17 PM
link   
a reply to: LanceCorvette

It's nuts that nobody knows WHY Cohen was raided, wiretapped, whatever. Just speculation.



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 06:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: LanceCorvette

It's nuts that nobody knows WHY Cohen was raided, wiretapped, whatever. Just speculation.



It would actually be more common that we don't know that someone was raided. Most raids don't make the news, and when they result in criminal charges, it's way down the line once the evidence is found to support the susptected crime.



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 06:51 PM
link   
Found this earlier today Mueller seeks 70 blank subpoenas in Manafort case



Special Counsel Robert Mueller on Thursday filed a request for 70 blank subpoenas in the Virginia court presiding over one of two criminal proceedings involving former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort.

The two-page filing doesn’t offer much in the way of details, but each subpoena orders the recipient to appear at the federal courthouse in Alexandria on July 10 at 10 a.m. to testify at Manafort’s trial on charges stemming from Mueller’s investigation of Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.


Is it normal to issue blank subpoenas? Are they just trying to make sure none of the witness has a heads up?



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 06:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: liveandlearn
Found this earlier today Mueller seeks 70 blank subpoenas in Manafort case



Special Counsel Robert Mueller on Thursday filed a request for 70 blank subpoenas in the Virginia court presiding over one of two criminal proceedings involving former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort.

The two-page filing doesn’t offer much in the way of details, but each subpoena orders the recipient to appear at the federal courthouse in Alexandria on July 10 at 10 a.m. to testify at Manafort’s trial on charges stemming from Mueller’s investigation of Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.


Is it normal to issue blank subpoenas? Are they just trying to make sure none of the witness has a heads up?


I'm really getting tired of this horse & pony show called the special council.
Enough already!!

Tomorrow, I want the special council shut down, RR fired and the FBI/DOJ raided with Marshals to gather all the info.
I can dream right? *** SIGH ***



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 07:13 PM
link   
The jet in Q's post is a jetBlue A321 with the jetBlue "Prism" paint schema which was introduced only on their A321 fleet.
www.jetblue.com...

A list of their currently active A321s can be found here:
www.planespotters.net...



Airbus A321-200 N903JB
Airbus A321-200 N905JB
Airbus A321-200 N907JB
Airbus A321-200 N913JB
*Airbus A321-200 N923JB
Airbus A321-200 N929JB
*Airbus A321-200 N934JB
*Airbus A321-200 N935JB
*Airbus A321-200 N937JB
*Airbus A321-200 N942JB
Airbus A321-200 N943JT
*Airbus A321-200 N944JT
Airbus A321-200 N945JT
Airbus A321-200 N946JL
Airbus A321-200 N947JB
Airbus A321-200 N965JT
Airbus A321-200 N948JB
Airbus A321-200 N949JT
Airbus A321-200 N950JT
Airbus A321-200 N952JB
Airbus A321-200 N954JB
Airbus A321-200 N955JB
Airbus A321-200 N956JT
Airbus A321-200 N957JB
Airbus A321-200 N958JB
Airbus A321-200 N959JB
*Airbus A321-200 N961JT
*Airbus A321-200 N962JT
*Airbus A321-200 N964JT
Airbus A321-200 N966JT
*Airbus A321-200 N967JT
*Airbus A321-200 N968JT
Airbus A321-200 N969JT
Airbus A321-200 N971JT
Airbus A321-200 N970JB
Airbus A321-200 N974JT
Airbus A321-200 N972JT
Airbus A321-200 N975JT
*Airbus A321-200 N976JT
*Airbus A321-200 N978JB
*Airbus A321-200 N979JT
*Airbus A321-200 N980JT
*Airbus A321-200 N981JT
*Airbus A321-200 N983JT
*Airbus A321-200 N985JT
*Airbus A321-200 N982JB
*Airbus A321-200 N987JT
*Airbus A321-200 N984JB
*Airbus A321-200 N986JB
*Airbus A321-200 N989JT
*Airbus A321-200 N988JT
*Airbus A321-200 N990JL
*Airbus A321-200 N991JT
*Airbus A321-200 N993JE
*Airbus A321-200 N992JB
Airbus A321-200 N994JL


A321 jets that recently arrived or departed in San Francisco are marked with * and their flight records are here:

www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...

Flights that recently departed SF on May 2 around noon to match sun position and release date of Q's pictures here:

www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...
www.flightradar24.com...

Two going to Boston and two going to New York.
edit on 3-5-2018 by More1ThanAny1 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 07:23 PM
link   
a reply to: More1ThanAny1

About time we got our own planefag(not an insult btw) in here.
Thanks for the research.



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 07:24 PM
link   
a reply to: liveandlearn

Probably "unnamed" Russians.

Because they don't who they are yet.

✴️😎



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 07:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: liveandlearn

Probably "unnamed" Russians.

Because they don't who they are yet.

✴️😎


Manafort was involved in shady Ukraine deals. I really don't mind if that scumbag goes down for it.



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 07:35 PM
link   
Some further potential spelling mistakes we may have missed. (Many may be valid US spellings of English words):

Q Posts / word mis-spelt:

1241 / installments (should be single L? or double LL valid in U.S.?)
1241 / funneled (should be double L? or single valid in U.S.?)
1239 / @algore ( should be @Al Gore? Why no Titlecase?)
1138 / Ray.Chandler (why the period instead of space between first/surname?)
1100 / +6 mo (unusual abbreviation for months)
1045 / instill (valid with 2 Ls in US?)
1008 / Cheatin' Obama (why drop g and use ' - same length/effort!)
859 / peo>>567493ple (deliberate insertion of post ID in middle of people?)
833 / labeled ( should be labelled?)
832 / suspectable (sense says it should say "certain minds to be susceptible to...")
772 / Fairytale (should be two words - Fairy tale)
770 / Aaron swartz (No title case on surname)
751 /suc (used twice - short for success? You'ld usually use succ as shortened version)
725 /Ogames (O-games as short for Olympic games used earlier in post so why 2nd different?)
703 /Socities (should be societies)
551 /asst (should be Asst?)
453 /leakin' (leaking)
426 /missle (missile)
409 /priorty (priority)
341 /selfincriminating (self-incriminating or self incriminating)
328 /d_a_rkness
328 /darkne_s_s
328 /will_reveal_darkness
189 /Jewelry (should be jewellery. does Jewelry refer to Jews/Lords/Gods?)
157 /noncredible (should be non-credible or incredible?)
151 /refueling (should be refuelling)
140 /labeled (should be labelled?)
138 /Philip Pines (should be Phillipines)
133 /traveled (should be travelled?)
119 /accum (accum. or accumulate)
97 /darnkess (should be darkness)
91 /addy (should be address)
60 /dialed (should be dialled?)
39 /missle (should be missile)
36 /miscat (should be miscategorised)
4 /intellingence (should be intelligence)
2 /presidecy (should be presidency)



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 07:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: WhatTheory

originally posted by: liveandlearn
Found this earlier today Mueller seeks 70 blank subpoenas in Manafort case



Special Counsel Robert Mueller on Thursday filed a request for 70 blank subpoenas in the Virginia court presiding over one of two criminal proceedings involving former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort.

The two-page filing doesn’t offer much in the way of details, but each subpoena orders the recipient to appear at the federal courthouse in Alexandria on July 10 at 10 a.m. to testify at Manafort’s trial on charges stemming from Mueller’s investigation of Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.


Is it normal to issue blank subpoenas? Are they just trying to make sure none of the witness has a heads up?


I'm really getting tired of this horse & pony show called the special council.
Enough already!!

Tomorrow, I want the special council shut down, RR fired and the FBI/DOJ raided with Marshals to gather all the info.
I can dream right? *** SIGH ***


That is the best post of the day. My sentiments exactly!

All the hard investigative work I see here in this thread is for absolutely nothing (except mental exercise), if the Department of Justice doesn't start taking findings, recommendations, and prosecuting.
edit on 5/3/2018 by carewemust because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 07:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Perfectenemy

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: liveandlearn

Probably "unnamed" Russians.

Because they don't who they are yet.

✴️😎


Manafort was involved in shady Ukraine deals. I really don't mind if that scumbag goes down for it.


Neither do I. I remember Tony Podesta went down because of him. I am wondering if he is a witness or defendant. hoping he is named as an accessory.



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 07:39 PM
link   
a reply to: More1ThanAny1

Thank you!

Is that data SF bay or SFO intl. Specifically?



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 07:40 PM
link   
a reply to: WhatTheory

Just call CNN and claim to be a person familiar with the matter and that you must remain anonymous because you’re a part of Trumps cabinet.

They’ll believe you 100% just make sure to say that RR is actually colluding with Trump and Russia and you can prove it soon just need a little more time.



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 07:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: liveandlearn

Probably "unnamed" Russians.

Because they don't who they are yet.

✴️😎


Or keep 'em blank as long as possible to keep people thinking one will be for Trump. Let the left continue to believe he'll be frog-marched out as long as possible.



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 07:43 PM
link   
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

I'm no expert so please correct me if i'm wrong but Sniffers have problems with misspelled words, dont they?



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 07:44 PM
link   
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

+6 mo

Mo is the symbol for Molybdenum

Oxidation state +6 MoF6
🧐



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 07:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: liveandlearn

originally posted by: Perfectenemy

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: liveandlearn

Probably "unnamed" Russians.

Because they don't who they are yet.

✴️😎


Manafort was involved in shady Ukraine deals. I really don't mind if that scumbag goes down for it.


Neither do I. I remember Tony Podesta went down because of him. I am wondering if he is a witness or defendant. hoping he is named as an accessory.


You are alluding to the Podesta Group and Mercury as A and B arent you? The MSM didn't even really bother with reports and inquiries on that one.
edit on 3-5-2018 by Perfectenemy because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 07:52 PM
link   
a reply to: Perfectenemy

Yes I believe sniffers do have problems with miss spelt words. Q has also told us to look out for them.

I therefore decided to apply an English spellchecker on the posts column from my s/sheet to try and get a full set.

Some interesting ones I hadn't noticed before. I'm wondering whether when it happens I'm supposed to correct before applying magic square.



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 07:55 PM
link   
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Looking at some of those spellings I am loving spellcheck even more.

Does infinity have/use spellcheck? If they do then certainly could be purposeful.




top topics



 
170
<< 183  184  185    187  188  189 >>

log in

join