It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Donald Trump Suggests Appointment of Special Counsel Was Illegal After James Comey Leaks

page: 2
28
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 21 2018 @ 07:26 PM
link   
Trump have really good legal mind.
And real good brain.
Him choose best attorneys. Real smart ones. But Trump smarter even than them.

Trump legal opinions right on!

edit on 4/21/2018 by Phage because: (no reason given)




posted on Apr, 21 2018 @ 07:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Ypu and I are probably at different ends of the political spectrum.

However I think you can see the irony of its cool when out guys do it and a crime when your guys do it.

Personally I get pissed when it's my guys. I don't protect them.

edit on 21-4-2018 by luthier because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 21 2018 @ 07:35 PM
link   
a reply to: luthier

I'm at the end of no spectrum that I know of.

Unless it's the spectrum of respect for anything that comes out our president's mouth (or fingers, and they are awesomely large fingers). But that's not politics.

edit on 4/21/2018 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 21 2018 @ 07:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: luthier
So you agree with the perjury trap for Clinton but not Trump?

Enough said..



No I don't agree. There were crimes in White Water,
ask the McDougal's.

I am just going to quote Senator Grassley to you.



“If the same actions have different outcomes, and those differences seem to correspond to partisan political interests, then the public will naturally suspect that law enforcement decisions are not on the up-and-up,”


twitter.com...

With the Special Counsel Mueller being appointed by Rosenstien,
who has massive conflicts of interest and granted an investigation
that is open ended and not based on a specific crime it is a high
offense to the law of the land and the constitution.



posted on Apr, 21 2018 @ 07:38 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

As an old guy I just find it halarious.

Ever since 911 republicans and Democrats tick away at the privacy rights of Americans. They expand spying and than its hysteria time when crap goes south.

Yeah that's why "nuts" like me make a big deal every time these votes come up. No matter who's side does it.



posted on Apr, 21 2018 @ 07:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships
With the Special Counsel Mueller being appointed by Rosenstien,
who has massive conflicts of interest and granted an investigation
that is open ended and not based on a specific crime it is a high
offense to the law of the land and the constitution.


If you are correct and I'm not saying you are, then why not simply take it to court and challenge its constitutionality? Heck Im sure old Slick WIlly would have done so if it was. Or better yet if no crime has been committed then the SC investigation would come to an end no? But like an onion there seems to be many layers.........
edit on 4/21/18 by FredT because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 21 2018 @ 07:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: luthier
So you agree with the perjury trap for Clinton but not Trump?

Enough said..



No I don't agree. There were crimes in White Water,
ask the McDougal's.

I am just going to quote Senator Grassley to you.



“If the same actions have different outcomes, and those differences seem to correspond to partisan political interests, then the public will naturally suspect that law enforcement decisions are not on the up-and-up,”


twitter.com...

With the Special Counsel Mueller being appointed by Rosenstien,
who has massive conflicts of interest and granted an investigation
that is open ended and not based on a specific crime it is a high
offense to the law of the land and the constitution.



So white water were crimes yet 4 years of "special councils couldn't find anyrhing. Then he got busted for a bj?

But 1 year of a SC for your guys and they go after a "bj" and it's panic hysteria time.

Good to know.



posted on Apr, 21 2018 @ 07:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: xuenchen

How are comeys leaks even in the same Forrest as collusion?!!!

Oh. They aren’t..


If somthing was wrong with Comey leaking his memos. It might negate the memos, but nothing else.


Quite the contrary... the memos, and the intentional leaking there of, prove colusion. The White House conspired with the DOJ and the FBI to undermine a presidential election. Your hatred has clouded yor judgement



posted on Apr, 21 2018 @ 07:44 PM
link   
Does the IC get its info from the news like obama?
Why would they use a NYT report to look into anything? Aren't they supposed to have all the info anyway , I don't get it



posted on Apr, 21 2018 @ 07:47 PM
link   
a reply to: FredT

It like an onion that went to seed already,
no way to find all of them before they sprout.

Imo, the SC was not necessary to indict
Manafort, that could have been done years ago.

But I also look at people like Tony Podesta who
was involved and instead of an indictment he
as been allowed to close up shop, travel to
foreign countries and expand his art colleciton.

Seems like a double standard just on that
comparison alone. And there are other examples
such as Flynn, who was indicted for lying to the FBI.

Well I guess we will have to wait and see if any others
that have lied to the FBI will be indicted, such as McCabe.



posted on Apr, 21 2018 @ 07:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: JHumm
Does the IC get its info from the news like obama?
Why would they use a NYT report to look into anything? Aren't they supposed to have all the info anyway , I don't get it


Direct backchannels from CNN.

🧐



posted on Apr, 21 2018 @ 08:08 PM
link   
Wouldnt the DAG have the clearance necessary to view said memos if they were classified seeing as he would has oversight of the FBI? I am not sure how leaking of memos makes this whole thing illegal. Because the DAG could just go to the FBI and review the actual files on record and make a determination based on that.



posted on Apr, 21 2018 @ 08:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Pyle

Of course not.

Trump have best legal mind. Trump correct!



posted on Apr, 21 2018 @ 08:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Pyle
Wouldnt the DAG have the clearance necessary to view said memos if they were classified seeing as he would has oversight of the FBI? I am not sure how leaking of memos makes this whole thing illegal. Because the DAG could just go to the FBI and review the actual files on record and make a determination based on that.


That is happening now, a review is already underway.

www.cnbc.com...



posted on Apr, 21 2018 @ 08:12 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Well, we already know it didn't follow DoJ guidelines. According to those guidelines a specific crime must be laid out to be investigated. That is not satisfied in the appointment letter.
edit on 21-4-2018 by Dfairlite because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 21 2018 @ 08:13 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Don't forget that Comey and Rosenstein were working together. Rosenstein suggested that Comey be fired. After Comey was fired, Rosenstein appointed a Special Counsel... their (Comey/Rosenstein) mutual friend, Bob Mueller.



posted on Apr, 21 2018 @ 08:14 PM
link   
Little secret for you guys. Unless you focus on the way Congress (who ever they are) votes moving forward the next James Comey or whoever your boogeyman is, is already on deck ready to further take away your rights.

While you were worrying about elite people getting spied on (how dare they only the American people deserve that) they voted for FIsa to include more Americans.



posted on Apr, 21 2018 @ 08:14 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

Seems the review should have begun the moment Comey revealed that he had given someone that information. That was a while back. Was there some delay in the process?



posted on Apr, 21 2018 @ 08:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: burntheships

Seems the review should have begun the moment Comey revealed that he had given someone that information. That was a while back. Was there some delay in the process?


Boy that is crazy talk...

Now we know Grassley read these early January and he is trying to protect Mueller.

Must be a Clinton supporter.



posted on Apr, 21 2018 @ 08:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: xuenchen

Well, we already know it didn't follow DoJ guidelines. According to those guidelines a specific crime must be laid out to be investigated. That is not satisfied in the appointment letter.


Is that what happened during whitewater?




top topics



 
28
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join