It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: Lumenari
I think many here are missing the point.
The DNC lawyer that filed this is possibly the stupidest person ever.
So NOW the defendants have the right of discovery too... let that sink in.
Also, I hope to God you aren't suggesting I let that sink in given my first comment was on how the DNC is going to have to make their evidence available to the Defense for their experts to examine.
Not only did I let that sink in, first...but then I moved on to other thoughts that I wish people would let 'sink in.'
Thoughts that may not be so obvious as the discovery of evidence process.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: Lumenari
The DNC just gave Trump a Christmas present, if he runs with it right.
Or they are trying to roll in a trojan horse.
originally posted by: Lumenari
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: Lumenari
I think many here are missing the point.
The DNC lawyer that filed this is possibly the stupidest person ever.
So NOW the defendants have the right of discovery too... let that sink in.
Also, I hope to God you aren't suggesting I let that sink in given my first comment was on how the DNC is going to have to make their evidence available to the Defense for their experts to examine.
Not only did I let that sink in, first...but then I moved on to other thoughts that I wish people would let 'sink in.'
Thoughts that may not be so obvious as the discovery of evidence process.
The DNC just moved the VENUE.
Now, if you are going to jump to the conclusion that they did this because they took the time to plant evidence in a server that can't actually be used as evidence anymore because it wasn't seized in the first place, then I don't know what to tell you.
But keep on keeping on, I guess...
Just the thought of this cheers me up enormously.
originally posted by: xuenchen
link to the paperwork 66 pages
They have an excellent chance because they're suing somebody named "John Does 1-10"
BwaaaaaaHaHaha
and they're citing all kinds of MSM stories with "sources close to the rumors"
πππ
originally posted by: TheRedneck
It cheers me up because I see it as proof that internal polls are showing the DNC has lost support. This is a pure panic move for several reasons.
Polls taken at the start of the year compared to the latest show Democrats went from a 12 point lead over Republicans down to a 3 point lead.
After reading the lawsuit it does make me wonder. It seems as if the DNC is trying to get this lawsuit into the courts prior to the end of Mueller's investigation.
Interesting.. They filed it in the Southern district of New York.
doing everything they can to distract normies from the most corrupt administration in US history under Obama
originally posted by: howtonhawky
Rumors are that discovery will be very interesting.
The jurors will be put into a tv viewing room and forced to watch reruns of the msm news cast for the last two yrs..
originally posted by: Xcathdra
After reading the lawsuit it does make me wonder. It seems as if the DNC is trying to get this lawsuit into the courts prior to the end of Mueller's investigation. Especially if Trump is not considered a target / subject / whatever term you want to use.
If Mueller clears Trump and this ends then the DNC would have a hard time getting its case in court since the results of Mueller's investigation would destroy the primary argument in their brief - that Trump colluded with Russia. IF it doesnt get dismissed I look for the DNC to drag this suit out as long as they can to continue keeping Russia-Trump bs alive into the midterms and if they can manage into the 2020 election cycle.