It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Judge Andrew Napolitano: Trump and the attorney-client privilege

page: 5
29
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 04:13 PM
link   
a reply to: luthier

I dont think anyone should tell people anything, ever.

LOL, or as close to that as possible. Get good at chit chat and running.

Law in our country is flawed and terribly executed.


edit on 4 19 2018 by tadaman because: (no reason given)




posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 04:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: luthier

I dont think anyone should tell people anything, ever.

LOL, or as close to that as possible. Get good at chit chat and running.

Law in our country is flawed and terribly executed.



True. Especially lawyers. They usually see dollar signs the more you need them.



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 04:19 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

A priest could help with that. Maybe she fears hell and he can sell it as a sin to rat me out. LoL

Yeah, I would tell a lawyer the minimum and never trust anything they tell me.

My lawyer may laugh at me with the prosecution and judge after the fact for all I know. What I see tells me as much.

When they work things out among themselves I doubt the lawyers feel loyal to their client. They are mental factory workers and we are all on an assembly line.

edit on 4 19 2018 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 04:22 PM
link   
a reply to: tadaman

Oh they feal loyalty if they see a lengthy retainer.



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 05:43 PM
link   
a reply to: luthier

" Uh no it doesn't and shouldn't work that way. The DOJ should follow evidence. "

The Evidence to Serious High Crimes is in Plain Sight . The Question Now Is , Why this Abnormal Inaction from a Government Agency Explicitly Empowered to Address it ? The Answer in my mind would be that the DOJ has been Completely Compromised by Subversives within our Present Federal Government through the Manipulation of Blackmail against those who Hold Authority in such matters . Who that Might Directly be is Anyones Guess IMO......
edit on 19-4-2018 by Zanti Misfit because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 05:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: luthier

" Uh no it doesn't and shouldn't work that way. The DOJ should follow evidence. "

The Evidence to Serious High Crimes is in Plain Sight , the Question Now Is , Why this Abnormal Inaction from a Government Agency Explicitly Empowered to Address it ? The Answer in my mind would be that the DOJ has been Completely Compromised by Subversives within our Present Federal Government through the Manipulation of Blackmail against those who Hold Authority in such matters . Who that Might be is Anybodies Guess IMO........


Nothing new. The writing was on the wall with ashcroft.

And trump has terrible judgement to have picked sessions, rodstein, and Wray I guess.



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 05:49 PM
link   
a reply to: luthier

The President was Manipulated into having in his present Cabinet Members of the Deep State Conspirators who's Job it is to Steer him into their Own Agenda . Thank God Mr. Trump is Not Dumb Enough to Not Recognize that .
edit on 19-4-2018 by Zanti Misfit because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 05:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Of course not , Real Evidence is Needed for an indictment , and considering the Surveillance State we All Live in Today , that Evidence Exists .



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 06:15 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage


" The Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Office of the Inspector General (OIG) has referred fired FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia for criminal prosecution, multiple reports indicated Thursday."





www.breitbart.com...


www.newsmax.com...



Heads WILL Roll , they Cannot Escape the LAW..........
edit on 19-4-2018 by Zanti Misfit because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 06:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Zanti Misfit
Not sure what that has to do with this topic but McCabe's head already rolled. He was fired.
Now I guess we'll see if "lack of candor" is a crime.



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 06:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

McCabe is a Member of the Mysterious " Deep State " , it will Lead to the Other Criminals Eventually .



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 06:25 PM
link   
a reply to: Zanti Misfit

Lol. If you say so. Seems like just another sleezball developer to me



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 06:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Phage

As potus he has a right to executive privilege.
He also has a right to client privilege with his lawyer.

Unless trump committed crimes...but then mueller would have jumped on that and not passed it off to ny would he?


Executive privilege needs to be invoked. It is (despite current GOP using it) not a blanket thing that covers all communications at all times.



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 06:44 PM
link   
I imagine Trump is smart enough to not discuss anything "odd" over the phone or through e-mails at this point



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 07:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: toysforadults
I imagine Trump is smart enough to not discuss anything "odd" over the phone or through e-mails at this point


Sure. He had these rules as a sleezball developer.
edit on 19-4-2018 by luthier because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 20 2018 @ 01:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: shooterbrody




Remember this is OUTSIDE the scope of the sc investigation as mueller referred it out.

Yes. That's sort of the point.
Apparently Cohen is suspected of crimes (like bank fraud) which have nothing to do with Mueller's investigation. Do you think that should be ignored?




He's not the potus.

or lost an election.

So going with current wave of justice, no.

How bout McCabe lying 4 times?

Should he be given a pass?




posted on Apr, 20 2018 @ 01:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: shooterbrody




As potus he has a right to executive privilege.
He also has a right to client privilege with his lawyer.

Executive privilege has mostly to do giving testimony. It can be invoked (by the president, and it must be explicitly invoked) when someone is asked to testify about communications with the president. The president himself has to invoke it. Could it apply to search warrants? Maybe, but it is yet to be determined whether any of the material gathered fall under that category. Or are you thinking that it applies retroactively, to communications from before January 20, 2017?

It is yet to be determined which of the materials collected fall under privilege and can be retained as evidence.



You can't indict a sitting POTUS.

Article 2.

Go look at 1973. SC.

biotech.law.lsu.edu...





posted on Apr, 20 2018 @ 01:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: luthier

Gowdy is part of the Deep State.
Everybody knows that.









edit on 4 20 2018 by burgerbuddy because: (no reason given)

edit on 4 20 2018 by burgerbuddy because: (no reason given)

edit on 4 20 2018 by burgerbuddy because: (no reason given)

edit on 4 20 2018 by burgerbuddy because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 20 2018 @ 01:41 AM
link   
I find it very distressing that anyone would celebrate these constitutional violations simply because Trump is the victim. We should all care because one day Trump won't be President then it's your guy getting screwed from behind the scenes by people none of us ever voted for.

That is not legitimate government.



posted on Apr, 20 2018 @ 03:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Zanti Misfit
Not sure what that has to do with this topic but McCabe's head already rolled. He was fired.
Now I guess we'll see if "lack of candor" is a crime.


It is is if you lie to congress. Question becomes are they willing to prosecute him over it?




top topics



 
29
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join