It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The court documents on Friday say that investigators have been focused on Cohen's "personal business dealings," not his work as an attorney on behalf of Trump. Only attorney-client materials are shielded by the privilege — and then there are exceptions involving crime or fraud — and prosecutors say they have not recovered any communications between Cohen and Trump.
"Although Cohen is an attorney, he also has several other business interests and sources of income," prosecutors wrote. "The searches are the result of a months-long investigation into Cohen and seek evidence of crimes, many of which have nothing to do with his work as an attorney, but rather relate to Cohen's own business dealings."
we get "we have to investigate this person to tell you the crimes they've committed".
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: luthier
Yeah. I was going to bring up Ken Starr. Went with the Capone thing instead.
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: luthier
Yeah. I was going to bring up Ken Starr. Went with the Capone thing instead.
Sadly, the whataboutism was covered by your butty.
Just remember, this is how things happen now, so when a nice honest democrat is elected, we shouldn't hear any whining or complaining when he/she is surveilled based on "criminal investigations" of others who may know them.
“I don’t know what Mueller was supposed to do other than what he did. When a prosecutor comes in contact with information or evidence of a crime, what are you supposed to do, other than refer to the appropriate jurisdiction?” Gowdy said on Fox News Sunday.
Gowdy characterized the approval process for the raid as arduous and fair, adding that it was ultimately given the green light by a “neutral” judge “who has nothing to do with politics.”
originally posted by: luthier
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: luthier
Yeah. I was going to bring up Ken Starr. Went with the Capone thing instead.
Sadly, the whataboutism was covered by your butty.
Just remember, this is how things happen now, so when a nice honest democrat is elected, we shouldn't hear any whining or complaining when he/she is surveilled based on "criminal investigations" of others who may know them.
Fun catch words but false usage.
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: luthier
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: luthier
Yeah. I was going to bring up Ken Starr. Went with the Capone thing instead.
Sadly, the whataboutism was covered by your butty.
Just remember, this is how things happen now, so when a nice honest democrat is elected, we shouldn't hear any whining or complaining when he/she is surveilled based on "criminal investigations" of others who may know them.
Fun catch words but false usage.
I know, I laughed out loud when I typed "honest democrat".
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Phage
A Directive to his Attorney General at the DOJ would be Sufficient in order for Indictments to be issued to Said Criminals .