So was Hannity paying off hookers, or taking a bribe from Cohen???

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: butcherguy

Why would you need to pay someone off if your wife knew??

Hell , if they care out as a couple and said “look, we wanted a little spice. So we picked out a pornstar we liked and she was willing..” he is likely a hero..

So your mom, her mom AND your kids don't read about it in the tabloids?

a reply to: butcherguy

Of course not..

The enquirer buys up all the trump scandals to protect him. Lol..

Horrible example.



But I get your point. Of course some prudish old women will turn their noses up, but the wife being knowingly invoked take all the slimy out of it for me, and I assume countless others.

“I don’t know to to tell you fellas... Mrs. Hannity is a freak. Jealous much??”

Goes a long way I think.

If it is the more open relationship of , “I pay the bills so I get to cheat and she don’t say much” it would look kinda slimy..

But I personally think it is breaking the path of marriage that’s the sleazy part of affairs..

originally posted by: JoshuaCox


So obviously Cohen doesn’t do any “traditional” lawyering. Since his only 2 clients were people who Cohen was used to pay off mistresses.

So I think it is fair to assume that Cohen was doing the same thing for hannity. That he was doing for all his other clients..


Must suck to be Mrs. Hannity this week lol..


Or just as another possibility. What if trump paid Hannity to shill for him???

Say trump paid Cohen 5 million dollars to lie and make any scandal he had sound like a “left wing conspiracy theory”..


I know what doesn’t make sense....


Hannity’s story lol.. I bet Hannity has 4 legit Ivy League lawyers to handle all his buisness and realestate deals....


So what shady nonsense was Hannity up to??

Probably something like stealing the moon with squid guns.

So much unprovable speculation.

Trump paying Hannity to shill?
Doesn't change the fact the some 90% of journalists donated to Hillary and shilled for her.

Cohen represents Trump, so that must mean everyone Cohen represents is doing shady stuff?
You can't even prove Trump has done anything shady. Wait and See™ only gets you so far, and ongoing court proceedings arent proof. Hell, Mueller cant even prove there was collusion and an obstruction charge will be flimsy since the man in question illegally leaked information, and however good he felt his intentions were in doing so has no bearing.

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

I know what doesn’t make sense....

The premise of this thread....

originally posted by: Wardaddy454
So much unprovable speculation.

Trump paying Hannity to shill?
Doesn't change the fact the some 90% of journalists donated to Hillary and shilled for her.

Cohen represents Trump, so that must mean everyone Cohen represents is doing shady stuff?
You can't even prove Trump has done anything shady. Wait and See™ only gets you so far, and ongoing court proceedings arent proof. Hell, Mueller cant even prove there was collusion and an obstruction charge will be flimsy since the man in question illegally leaked information, and however good he felt his intentions were in doing so has no bearing.

True!

a reply to: Wardaddy454

Yea... that’s the way it is supposed to work... lmao..


Regular joes like your policies enough to support you..


Now when politicians have to pay you off for you to support them?!?


Damn

a reply to: Wardaddy454

A) He paid off a pornstar to keep the American people from finding out about trump one of his latest affairs.. with a pornstar...


Lol on what planet is that not shady?!?!

B) every client Cohen has , except hannity (so far) was someone who Cohen was paying off a mistress to stay quiet..

He wasn’t running a Normal lawfirm or practice and did a little mistress paying off on the side..


No paying off mistresses was all he was doing for his clients..


I don’t see how it is far fetched to guess he was doing the same thing for hannity he was doing for all his other clients.

a reply to: burdman30ott6

Lol....

In most places you have to include logic or evidence for people to take your claims seriously, but since it is you, screw it. I’m sure everyone will just instantly trust your every assertion as if it were sent by jesus himself!!!

Amen!

Lol

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
In most places you have to include logic or evidence for people to take your claims seriously

Yes, you obviously understand the concept, yet again here we are with another of "those" threads...

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: Wardaddy454

A) He paid off a pornstar to keep the American people from finding out about trump one of his latest affairs.. with a pornstar...


Lol on what planet is that not shady?!?!

B) every client Cohen has , except hannity (so far) was someone who Cohen was paying off a mistress to stay quiet..

He wasn’t running a Normal lawfirm or practice and did a little mistress paying off on the side..


No paying off mistresses was all he was doing for his clients..


I don’t see how it is far fetched to guess he was doing the same thing for hannity he was doing for all his other clients.

What planet is that illegal?

The rest of us just have to deal with the wife when she finds out. Right?

You know what I'm talking about.



ETA; was just asked this.

Hi Bro Gary, Do you have any friends are Pan Asian Female Mix?(Thai/Filipino)

I said not anymore, the wife made me stop.

Saul Goodman is screwed.

a reply to: JoshuaCox

No paying off mistresses was all he was doing for his clients..

Don't forget hiring thugs to intimidate people who are thinking of crossing his clients. Now that prosecutors have access to Cohen's rolodex, they can look up his contacts in Vegas and put a name to the face in Stormy's perp sketch. He will be some sort of "Casino security consultant" with a sketchy background who will deny it was him.

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: JoshuaCox

No paying off mistresses was all he was doing for his clients..

Don't forget hiring thugs to intimidate people who are thinking of crossing his clients. Now that prosecutors have access to Cohen's rolodex, they can look up his contacts in Vegas and put a name to the face in Stormy's perp sketch. He will be some sort of "Casino security consultant" with a sketchy background who will deny it was him.

A regular Lucky Luciano/Clinton

Right.

Well this crap deserves it's own forum, how about the "I Hate Hannity" forum...

originally posted by: manuelram16
Well this crap deserves it's own forum, how about the "I Hate Hannity" forum...

Your crappy post deserves its own forum. How about "I am butthurt and ned a safe space" forum?
You are welcome

originally posted by: testingtesting
Saul Goodman is screwed.

Say it ain't so for slippin jimmy!
Don't spoil season 4!

a reply to: DJW001

I don’t buy stormy’s story about the threat..

A) The threat likely invalidates the NDA as it would have been signed “under duress”.

B) the threat makes it the whole situation a crime, rather ban a moral issue.

C) the artists composite looks JUST like her first husband.. and I do mean JUST LIKE him.

D) her story is a conveniently “it happened years ago so you’ll just have to take my word for it..” type story..


If there was a crime mixed in the dynamic changes completely.... mainly because the states and fed can get involved.

So I wouldn’t hold your breath..

a reply to: Wardaddy454

A) Unprovable?!?!


We are maybe even likely to find out what the hannity connection is from the fbi?!?!


The concept of god is unprovable.. what Cohen was doing for hannity is quite provable..

B) all the journalists independently of their own volition deciding to support a candidate they legit believe in is not even remotely the same thing as a candidate paying off reporters to hide the truth about him and lie for them..

Obviously..

I don’t know how in your head option A is worse lol....

I who would rather have your candidate paying off the news. Rather than the news donating to a candidate they think is the better option?!?!


Conservative logic is a trip..


C) no..

The fbi saying he only had 3 clients and for 2 of those clients only paid off prostitututes is why me and others are speculating it was something shady..


Cohen did not have a normal practice but would do some dirt for Donald on the side..


His whole practice was only doing dirt for people.

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: Wardaddy454

Yea... that’s the way it is supposed to work... lmao..


Regular joes like your policies enough to support you..


Now when politicians have to pay you off for you to support them?!?


Damn

I wasn't paid off.

But when you have to resort to letting felons vote so you have a chance to win your primary... Damn.