It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Sandy Hook parents sue radio host Alex Jones for defamation

page: 8
29
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 08:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: testingtesting
Wait there are arm biggering pills?.


Yeah, I ordered you a truck load.




posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 08:29 AM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Wait till you see my sword cutting test video.
I have been working out



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 08:29 AM
link   
I learned from this thread that if children are involved you can't have any opinion because....children.
I doubt anyone would care as much if old folks in and old people's home would have been [pretended] to be shot. Plus you can't silence anyone with old people and ask anyone 'do you have an old person?'

I have read thousands of pages [including the whole report and script of SH papers as they appeared] and something is off.
I could fill so many pages with discrepancies that I want answers to, but as soon as anyone asks you get a massive hammer in your face with the word 'children' written on it.

When children are [apparently] involved nobody can say anything. It's a fail safe for not having to answer awkward questions or explain very illogical and impossible scenarios.

If they had the cheek to show us the gist of the whole SH affair, then don't be amazed if people find the holes in the stories and just want clarification.
I don't even want to harrass the 'parents', don't want to know their names; but I do want clarification and the right to discuss this damnit.

I want clarification to so many things that just don't make sense. Things you can see with your own eyes and hear with your own ears.

Yet two words nowadays can stop everything. One is 'racist' and the other is 'children'.

I don't like Alex Jones, can't stand the guy, but man, we are allowed to doubt some very doubtful footage/reports/interviews. Or are we?

Children...now shut up or you are a monster. Maybe some people want to know BECAUSE they have children and don't believe the narrative.



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 08:29 AM
link   
dp

edit on 19-4-2018 by Hecate666 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 08:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: Hecate666
I learned from this thread that if children are involved you can't have any opinion because....children.
I doubt anyone would care as much if old folks in and old people's home would have been [pretended] to be shot. Plus you can't silence anyone with old people and ask anyone 'do you have an old person?'

I have read thousands of pages [including the whole report and script of SH papers as they appeared] and something is off.
I could fill so many pages with discrepancies that I want answers to, but as soon as anyone asks you get a massive hammer in your face with the word 'children' written on it.

When children are [apparently] involved nobody can say anything. It's a fail safe for not having to answer awkward questions or explain very illogical and impossible scenarios.

If they had the cheek to show us the gist of the whole SH affair, then don't be amazed if people find the holes in the stories and just want clarification.
I don't even want to harrass the 'parents', don't want to know their names; but I do want clarification and the right to discuss this damnit.

I want clarification to so many things that just don't make sense. Things you can see with your own eyes and hear with your own ears.

Yet two words nowadays can stop everything. One is 'racist' and the other is 'children'.

I don't like Alex Jones, can't stand the guy, but man, we are allowed to doubt some very doubtful footage/reports/interviews. Or are we?

Children...now shut up or you are a monster. Maybe some people want to know BECAUSE they have children and don't believe the narrative.


That is why we see the media and government using children to attack our 2nd amendment rights. If were not against gun rights, that means we don't care about the children.



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 11:45 AM
link   
a reply to: Echo007




That is why we see the media and government using children to attack our 2nd amendment rights. If were not against gun rights, that means we don't care about the children.

Absolute nonsense , how have your gun rights been effected in the 5 years since Sandy Hook or subsequent shootings ?



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 12:09 PM
link   
All suspicions confirmed. Questioning the truth (that is fed to us) is prohibited.



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 12:28 PM
link   
Anyone who denys the plethera of school
shootings isn't aimed at gun rights is
refusing to question with an open mind.
For instance

Why is there a rash of school shootings
only in this country? Only in a country
with rights to firearms ? WTF is that?
Then toss in all the other questionable
shootings?
If that doesn't put a question mark in
your head? You don't need a head.



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 12:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: randyvs

Anyone who denys the plethera of school
shootings isn't aimed at gun rights is
refusing to question with an open mind.
For instance

Why is there a rash of school shootings
only in this country? Only in a country
with rights to firearms ? WTF is that?
Then toss in all the other questionable
shootings?
If that doesn't put a question mark in
your head? You don't need a head.


I'm not entirely sure I quite understand the above, but are you trying to say that school shootings only happen in the USA?



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 01:02 PM
link   
a reply to: gortex Gortex, can you provide evidence that Alex Jones said that Sandy Hook was "fake and a giant hoax and the parents of the children are crises actors"?



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 01:11 PM
link   
a reply to: pointessa

www.politifact.com...

There we go.



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 01:16 PM
link   
a reply to: pointessa

The question is can the lawyers of the families taking the action , I haven't listened to or watched Jones since the mid 2000s and I don't intend to restart that bad habit ,they must believe they have grounds to launch the lawsuit.
edit on 19-4-2018 by gortex because: time



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 01:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: gortex

Absolute nonsense , how have your gun rights been effected in the 5 years since Sandy Hook or subsequent shootings ?


If you live in Connecticut the answer is a resounding YES.
So failed legislation doesn't count as gun grabbing ?
There have been plenty of bills floated without success and they're still trying.
They DID succeed in Connecticut however and the name of the law proves Hecate666's post about using children correct:
Gun Violence Prevention and Children's Safety Act
lawcenter.giffords.org...
edit on 19-4-2018 by Asktheanimals because: added content



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 01:30 PM
link   
a reply to: Asktheanimals




So failed legislation doesn't count as gun grabbing ?

No , how can it ? , failed bills change nothing.
I'm sure there are bills on many issues that fall by the wayside , normally for good reason (or corporate interest)



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 01:39 PM
link   
a reply to: AngryCymraeg




I'm not entirely sure I quite understand the above, but are you trying to say that school shootings only happen in the USA?


No you do understand. Rash, as in multiple, consecutive, over abundant. These are not
terms that imply possession. So only in this
country do we see a rash of shootings that
involve children. For upscale public sentiment?
Or just because america?
edit on Rpm41918v47201800000054 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 01:41 PM
link   
Only 1 Million? Sue this bumbling idiot for more than that.

This guy makes up stories then reports on those stories while referencing his own articles as the source. Like cmon now, really?

sad part is people actually believe this retard.



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 01:56 PM
link   
a reply to: jidnum

Or are they having trouble silencing the
only talk radio show host calling attention
to the obvious? The guys not a retard
and it's not about believing him. I have
the same questions and see the same
hokey crap a lot of people see with Jones.
Then I go check him out to see if he can
explain it. But the media nor any official
ever even addresses or explains any of
It ever. Not once. That's retarded.
edit on Rpm41918v08201800000010 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 02:05 PM
link   
a reply to: pointessa

Anyone can find that if so inclined, I believe it is against T&C to repeat Jones bullsh#t here at this time.



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 02:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: jidnum

Or are they having trouble silencing the
only talk radio show host calling attention
to the obvious? The guys not a retard
and it's not about believing him. I have
the same questions and see the same
hokey crap a lot of people see with Jones.
Then I go check him out to see if he can
explain it. But the media nor any official
ever even addresses or explains any of
It ever. Not once. That's retarded.

Perhaps you could dig a little deeper into your vocabulary and lose the word 'retarded'? It really doesn't add to your credibility.



posted on Apr, 19 2018 @ 02:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: pointessa
a reply to: gortex Gortex, can you provide evidence that Alex Jones said that Sandy Hook was "fake and a giant hoax and the parents of the children are crises actors"?


Here's the complaint. It provides the examples you seek.
www.courthousenews.com...




top topics



 
29
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join