Free speech or Censorship

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: nightbringr
a reply to: Kurokage

Don't take what she says to heart. She already said she disagrees with the her friend having their child porn 'art' being taken away from them.

Her agenda here is frighteningly obvious and repugnant.

It is suspicious that both you censors and those busted for disseminating images of abused children call child porn free speech. Repugnant indeed.

I have no idea what you even mean by this.

If it helps, I've never once used to word ' free speech ' to describe the disgusting crime your friend was caught with.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: nightbringr
a reply to: Kurokage

Don't take what she says to heart. She already said she disagrees with the her friend having their child porn 'art' being taken away from them.

Her agenda here is frighteningly obvious and repugnant.

It is suspicious that both you censors and those busted for disseminating images of abused children call child porn free speech. Repugnant indeed.

You seem to love chasing your own tail and try making the same arguments and insults every time, in a previous thread a poster called you out and you refussed to say that a pedophiles freedom of speech should be curtailed. In my opinion that ends any argument you have or say!!
It's your blind devotion thats repugnant.

Free speech is an ideal.

noun
1.
a conception of something in its perfection.
2.
a standard of perfection or excellence.

www.dictionary.com...

It doesn't exist in reality no matter how much one would want it to.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

LesMisanthrope views on free speech and pedophilia here.

originally posted by: ScepticScot
www.abovetopsecret.com...

LesMisanthrope views on free speech and pedophilia here.

ScepticScot conflating defending free speech with defending pedophilia in the post quoted.

a reply to: nightbringr

I have no idea what you even mean by this.

If it helps, I've never once used to word ' free speech ' to describe the disgusting crime your friend was caught with.

My friend? Your attempts to connect me to child pornography and pedophilia is a reflection of your own motives, not mine.

originally posted by: Kurokage

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: nightbringr
a reply to: Kurokage

Don't take what she says to heart. She already said she disagrees with the her friend having their child porn 'art' being taken away from them.

Her agenda here is frighteningly obvious and repugnant.

It is suspicious that both you censors and those busted for disseminating images of abused children call child porn free speech. Repugnant indeed.

You seem to love chasing your own tail and try making the same arguments and insults every time, in a previous thread a poster called you out and you refussed to say that a pedophiles freedom of speech should be curtailed. In my opinion that ends any argument you have or say!!
It's your blind devotion thats repugnant.

No one's free speech should be curtailed. That does not imply that I believe pedophilia should not be curtailed. Your arguments are slanderous lies, I assume because good faith and logic have jumped out the window long ago.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: ScepticScot
www.abovetopsecret.com...

LesMisanthrope views on free speech and pedophilia here.

ScepticScot conflating defending free speech with defending pedophilia in the post quoted.

Did I? Where did I do that?

I think your posts however are quite clear.

a reply to: ScepticScot

Did I? Where did I do that?

I think your posts however are quite clear.

They are, as are your motives of trying to slander others.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: ScepticScot

Did I? Where did I do that?

I think your posts however are quite clear.

They are, as are your motives of trying to slander others.

What slander? It's your own words

a reply to: ScepticScot

What slander? It's your own words

Words you searched for, supplied, all while I am being accused of a pro-pedophile agenda.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: nightbringr
a reply to: Kurokage

Don't take what she says to heart. She already said she disagrees with the her friend having their child porn 'art' being taken away from them.

Her agenda here is frighteningly obvious and repugnant.

It is suspicious that both you censors and those busted for disseminating images of abused children call child porn free speech. Repugnant indeed.

This seems much closer to slander.

a reply to: ScepticScot

This seems much closer to slander.

That's a statement of truth. Slander is false.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: ScepticScot

This seems much closer to slander.

That's a statement of truth. Slander is false.

No deliberately trying to associate someone with pedophilia is pretty clear slander. Linking to your own words is not.

a reply to: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: ScepticScot

This seems much closer to slander.

That's a statement of truth. Slander is false.

That is not a statement of truth in the slightest!!
If anyone here can be linked to paedophilia with there comments its most definitely you by defending there right to post anything.

a reply to: ScepticScot

No deliberately trying to associate someone with pedophilia is pretty clear slander. Linking to your own words is not.

Linking to my words and saying those are my views of free speech and pedophilia is demonstrably false. Nowhere you linked do I state my views of pedophilia.

a reply to: Kurokage

That is not a statement of truth in the slightest!!

There are plenty of cases in the United States where pedophiles argued their materials are considered free speech.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: ScepticScot

No deliberately trying to associate someone with pedophilia is pretty clear slander. Linking to your own words is not.

Linking to my words and saying those are my views of free speech and pedophilia is demonstrably false. Nowhere you linked do I state my views of pedophilia.

People can read your own words and judge for themselves. Unlike you trying to associate another poster with pedophilia.

a reply to: ScepticScot

People can read your own words and judge for themselves. Unlike you trying to associate another poster with pedophilia.

Are those views on pedophilia, as you claim? If so, perhaps you can quote my views on pedophilia rather than posting a link claiming promising they are there.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Kurokage

That is not a statement of truth in the slightest!!

There are plenty of cases in the United States where pedophiles argued their materials are considered free speech.

And your the one defending them and trying to say its free speech!!
They should be locked up not defended by people like you with your "oh but it's free speech" comments.