It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
However, the OPCW did say its scientists had “confirmed the findings of the United Kingdom relating to the identity of the toxic chemical”.
Mr Lavrov nonetheless insisted: “If, of course, the OPCW refutes the fact of using the laboratory of Spiez, it will be interesting to listen to its explanations."
am sure that Russia is grateful for types like you that blindly believe in their ridiculous propaganda. "Useful idiots", I believe the term is.
originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: Jay-morris
You must be blind if you have not seen the evidence that points to Russia. The actual investigation is ongoing and all the "evidence" in that investigation will not be released yet due to the nature of the legal process.
I am sure that Russia is grateful for types like you that blindly believe in their ridiculous propaganda. "Useful idiots", I believe the term is.
originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: oldcarpy
um, let me try again.
We didnt investigate the attack. We used military force without proper checks and balances.
We may have blown up and spread chemical weapons all over the place.
Is the argument so difficult to grasp?
originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: oldcarpy
am sure that Russia is grateful for types like you that blindly believe in their ridiculous propaganda. "Useful idiots", I believe the term is.
And the Military industrial complex thanks you.
Yes that is the term. Correct.
What post of mine are you even talking about?
I am a "useless MIC idiot" because I disagree with someone?