Well, apparently it was said that they had a measurement problem when they were measuring the plutonium. There is no evidence to suggest that any of
the apparent losses reported were real losses of nuclear material. Therefore, it may not have been nuclear material. It could have been a
mis-interpretation of measurements.
Yeah. That's the same as what we are talking about. I found another that states that it was incorrect measurements of the plutonium. That's
unimaginable.