If Trump fires Mueller or Rosenstein, 300,000 activists will take action

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Pyle

So you'd feel justified protesting the 1st Amendment?


Irony!

Yes.

Let me counter that with another question, were people justified to protest the 18th amendment?

Hint: If your answers dont match you are wrong.

I question your reading comprehension.

Of course people have a right.

But like I said, there is a process to amend that.

Your bringing up the 18th is a perfect example.

And how did the build up to the repeal of the 18th happen?

Protest.

Obviously.

So you think your protest against Trump having the constitutional right to fire Rod Rosenstein is the same.

*that made me laugh*

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Pyle

So you'd feel justified protesting the 1st Amendment?


Irony!

Yes.

Let me counter that with another question, were people justified to protest the 18th amendment?

Hint: If your answers dont match you are wrong.

I question your reading comprehension.

Of course people have a right.

But like I said, there is a process to amend that.

Your bringing up the 18th is a perfect example.

And how did the build up to the repeal of the 18th happen?

Protest.

Obviously.

So you think your protest against Trump having the constitutional right to fire Rod Rosenstein is the same.

*that made me laugh*

Yep, it is. Better get over that fact because it seems to be a big hang up for you.

a reply to: DBCowboy

I think we have all agreed with that.

At this point I'm just saying that it isn't that ironic.

Name anything that is protested and it is probably constitutional; abortion, gun rights, anchor-babies, even war. Congress has the constitutional right to declare war

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: DBCowboy



At this point I'm just saying that it isn't that ironic.

That's your opinion.

It's not mine.

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Pyle

So you'd feel justified protesting the 1st Amendment?


Irony!

Yes.

Let me counter that with another question, were people justified to protest the 18th amendment?

Hint: If your answers dont match you are wrong.

I question your reading comprehension.

Of course people have a right.

But like I said, there is a process to amend that.

Your bringing up the 18th is a perfect example.

And how did the build up to the repeal of the 18th happen?

Protest.

Obviously.

So you think your protest against Trump having the constitutional right to fire Rod Rosenstein is the same.

*that made me laugh*

Yep, it is. Better get over that fact because it seems to be a big hang up for you.

Then you have a big issue.

Because unlike booze, I don't see a constitutional amendment to hamper the ability for a president to fire someone coming under scrutiny any time soon.

a reply to: DBCowboy

But I gave you a reason why. How can something be ironic when just about every other instance is the same?

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Pyle

So you'd feel justified protesting the 1st Amendment?


Irony!

Yes.

Let me counter that with another question, were people justified to protest the 18th amendment?

Hint: If your answers dont match you are wrong.

I question your reading comprehension.

Of course people have a right.

But like I said, there is a process to amend that.

Your bringing up the 18th is a perfect example.

And how did the build up to the repeal of the 18th happen?

Protest.

Obviously.

So you think your protest against Trump having the constitutional right to fire Rod Rosenstein is the same.

*that made me laugh*

Yep, it is. Better get over that fact because it seems to be a big hang up for you.

Then you have a big issue.

Because unlike booze, I don't see a constitutional amendment to hamper the ability for a president to fire someone coming under scrutiny any time soon.

I am sure the Puritans didnt see the people coming out in protests and pushing the congress to pass the 21s either.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: DBCowboy

But I gave you a reason why. How can something be ironic when just about every other instance is the same?

Pork chop, irony is in the eye of the beholder.

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Pyle

So you'd feel justified protesting the 1st Amendment?


Irony!

Yes.

Let me counter that with another question, were people justified to protest the 18th amendment?

Hint: If your answers dont match you are wrong.

I question your reading comprehension.

Of course people have a right.

But like I said, there is a process to amend that.

Your bringing up the 18th is a perfect example.

And how did the build up to the repeal of the 18th happen?

Protest.

Obviously.

So you think your protest against Trump having the constitutional right to fire Rod Rosenstein is the same.

*that made me laugh*

Yep, it is. Better get over that fact because it seems to be a big hang up for you.

Then you have a big issue.

Because unlike booze, I don't see a constitutional amendment to hamper the ability for a president to fire someone coming under scrutiny any time soon.

I am sure the Puritans didnt see the people coming out in protests and pushing the congress to pass the 21s either.

Well then best of luck.

See you on the battlefield.

Of ideas, of course.

Right. What are they going to do? Protest? Vandalize? Burn tires/rubber in the streets? These are the same fools that are trying to disarm over "300,000" Americans! Gee! I wonder why? Hmmm? Allow me, to "educate" you. ..
The communist/Socialist believe they have enough "democratic" support base, entrenched, in The U.S. American Republic to make a move on America. I'll educate you further,... They're "calling" way to early in the game. At this point in time? They seem impatient. It appears they had hoped on indoctrination, within two generations. .. But failed to calculate, for failure of "public education/Indoctrination". 300,000 traitors would/will be mopped up easily, by any simple "militia", that "stick to their bible and guns".

Oh no! "Activist" are going to "activate"! Lol!...

a reply to: DBCowboy

I'm pretty sure that there is a textbook definition of it.

Of course your insistence just shows that you want this to be special when it is, in fact, just more of the same.

originally posted by: murphy22
Right. What are they going to do? Protest? Vandalize? Burn tires/rubber in the streets? These are the same fools that are trying to disarm over "300,000" Americans! Gee! I wonder why? Hmmm? Allow me, to "educate" you. ..
The communist/Socialist believe they have enough "democratic" support base, entrenched, in The U.S. American Republic to make a move on America. I'll educate you further,... They're "calling" way to early in the game. At this point in time? They seem impatient. It appears they had hoped on indoctrination, within two generations. .. But failed to calculate, for failure of "public education/Indoctrination". 300,000 traitors would/will be mopped up easily, by any simple "militia", that "stick to their bible and guns".

Oh no! "Activist" are going to "activate"! Lol!...

What is with people conflating riots with protests and protesters with traitors? Is GWB back in office and we need another war... oh wait never mind.

originally posted by: murphy22
But failed to calculate, for failure of "public education/Indoctrination". 300,000 traitors would/will be mopped up easily, by any simple "militia", that "stick to their bible and guns".

Great argument, that new indoctrination couldn't compete with the old indoctrination!!!

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: DBCowboy

I'm pretty sure that there is a textbook definition of it.

Of course your insistence just shows that you want this to be special when it is, in fact, just more of the same.

They told me there wouldn't be maths or a test. So I will disregard your textbooks thank you.

a reply to: DBCowboy
Math is hard.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
They told me there wouldn't be maths or a test. So I will disregard your textbooks thank you.

Well, the constitution is in one of them so, are you going to disregard it as well? That would be ironic.

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: DBCowboy
They told me there wouldn't be maths or a test. So I will disregard your textbooks thank you.

Well, the constitution is in one of them so, are you going to disregard it as well? That would be ironic.

Are you sure?

Textbook and all. . . . . .

a reply to: DBCowboy

Am I sure about what?

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: abe froman

Our right to protest doesn't matter, we've got bodies to pile up!

You have a right to protest but you don't have the right to restrict and impede law enforcement, emergency crews or a persons freedom to move about this country freely. If your dumb enough to confuse a freeway as your safe zone you deserve to be ran over, IMO. May sound harsh to you but people are sick of the BS antics and self entitlement of some of these idiots. Some of these people need a serious wake up call to reality, enough whining and pouting already, grow the F up.

originally posted by: mtnshredder

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: abe froman

Our right to protest doesn't matter, we've got bodies to pile up!

You have a right to protest but you don't have the right to restrict and impede law enforcement, emergency crews or a persons freedom to move about this country freely. If your dumb enough to confuse a freeway as your safe zone you deserve to be ran over, IMO. May sound harsh to you but people are sick of the BS antics and self entitlement of some of these idiots. Some of these people need a serious wake up call to reality, enough whining and pouting already, grow the F up.

You need to do some damn history research. You are spouting the same damn thing the segregationist and jim crow supporters during the civil rights era.