It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

If Trump fires Mueller or Rosenstein, 300,000 activists will take action

page: 7
31
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 10:51 PM
link   
a reply to: daskakik

No.

I have stated that they have every right to protest.

I've only said that protesting a constitutional right and hiding behind the constitution while doing so, is ironic.




posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 10:57 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

You are correct, you did not say unconstitutional, you used the term anti-constitutional.

Although, protesting one element, even though constitutional also doesn't make it anti-constitutional.

It isn't unheard of.



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 11:03 PM
link   
a reply to: daskakik

Trump has the constitutional right to fire Rod Rosenstein.

People are threatening to use the constitutional right to protest someone using a constitutional right.


At the very least, I find it ironic.



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 11:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DBCowboy

What makes a protest anti-constitutional?




When people are protesting against constitutional elements and/or rights.


Because the Constitution is some unchanging document that has not be updated in 200+ years right?

List of amendments to the US constitution.


You do realize that there is a process to amending the Constitution and it does not include mob rule, don't you?


So I guess you dont remember how the 19th, 24th, and 26th amendments took years of protesting and marches and political negotiating?

Those people were all protesting for things that were not constitutional does that make them some kind of evil that you are tyring to say people today are?



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 11:06 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy




Trump has the constitutional right to fire Rod Rosenstein.

According to Trump. He's slowly learning that the title president does not mean the same thing as boss.
Shockingly, there are three branches of our government.

edit on 4/14/2018 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 11:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: daskakik

Trump has the constitutional right to fire Rod Rosenstein.

People are threatening to use the constitutional right to protest someone using a constitutional right.


At the very least, I find it ironic.



And Nixon had the legal constitutional right to fire AG Elliot Richardson and DAG William Ruckelshaus but that didnt stop him from being nearly impeached for the act if not for his resignation and later pardon.



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 11:08 PM
link   
a reply to: Pyle

So you'd feel justified protesting the 1st Amendment?


Irony!



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 11:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DBCowboy




Trump has the constitutional right to fire Rod Rosenstein.

According to Trump. He's slowly learning that the title president does not mean the same thing as boss.
Shockingly, there are three branches of our government.


I am aware.

I think I may have even passed that part of the test.



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 11:11 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Yeah. Me too.

I guess Trump wasn't paying attention in his civics classes.
edit on 4/14/2018 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 11:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DBCowboy

Yeah. Me too.

I guess Trump wasn't paying attention in his civics classes.


He doesn't have to.

He can always look it up.

It's "open book" when you reach that level.



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 11:13 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

I heard he doesn't know how to use a computer, or read much.

So it's on the job training. Driving him nuts.


edit on 4/14/2018 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 11:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DBCowboy

I heard he doesn't know how to use a computer, or read much.

So it's on the job training. Driving him nuts.



Well, if he's not up to the job, there's always 2020.

If I were you, I'd probably vote for someone else.



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 11:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
Trump has the constitutional right to fire Rod Rosenstein.

People are threatening to use the constitutional right to protest someone using a constitutional right.

I know but it isn't that ironic.

I'm willing to bet that 9 out of ten things that are protested are constitutional.



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 11:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Pyle

So you'd feel justified protesting the 1st Amendment?


Irony!



Yes.

Let me counter that with another question, were people justified to protest the 18th amendment?

Hint: If your answers dont match you are wrong.



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 11:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: AgarthaSeed

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
a reply to: xuenchen



Um... lots of people know who he is. Its the whole reason for the protests. I know right-wing live on memes now but that doesnt make the memes correct.


I'm willing to bet that at least half of the folks who would show up to protest cannot identify Rosenstein in a photo and probably couldn't name the position he currently holds.

( but they'll remember to request their check from MoveOn)


So you just assume they are as ignorant on the subject as you?


You assume I'm ignorant on the subject? Why, because I posted a meme? Your responses in this thread are ample evidence of your dim intellect.



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 11:18 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy
I did.



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 11:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Pyle

So you'd feel justified protesting the 1st Amendment?


Irony!



Yes.

Let me counter that with another question, were people justified to protest the 18th amendment?

Hint: If your answers dont match you are wrong.


I question your reading comprehension.

Of course people have a right.

But like I said, there is a process to amend that.

Your bringing up the 18th is a perfect example.



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 11:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: DBCowboy
Trump has the constitutional right to fire Rod Rosenstein.

People are threatening to use the constitutional right to protest someone using a constitutional right.

I know but it isn't that ironic.

I'm willing to bet that 9 out of ten things that are protested are constitutional.


I think protest is fine.

I only question the subject matter.


(I have that right)



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 11:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Pyle

So you'd feel justified protesting the 1st Amendment?


Irony!



Yes.

Let me counter that with another question, were people justified to protest the 18th amendment?

Hint: If your answers dont match you are wrong.


I question your reading comprehension.

Of course people have a right.

But like I said, there is a process to amend that.

Your bringing up the 18th is a perfect example.


And how did the build up to the repeal of the 18th happen?



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 11:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DBCowboy
I did.


Good for you!

I actually voted for Trump.

Don't know who I'll vote for in 2020, since I haven't seen anyone else's platforms.




top topics



 
31
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join