It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

If Trump fires Mueller or Rosenstein, 300,000 activists will take action

page: 6
31
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 10:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: burntheships

Because I was responding to a poster who brought up only one.


Still Whataboutery.




posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 10:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DBCowboy

Because the Constitution says you can?

Why does a dog lick its nuts?



Because it can't reach the a-hole?



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 10:23 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy




When people are protesting against constitutional elements and/or rights.

That's their right.
Right?
edit on 4/14/2018 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 10:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: AgarthaSeed

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
a reply to: xuenchen



Um... lots of people know who he is. Its the whole reason for the protests. I know right-wing live on memes now but that doesnt make the memes correct.


I'm willing to bet that at least half of the folks who would show up to protest cannot identify Rosenstein in a photo and probably couldn't name the position he currently holds.

( but they'll remember to request their check from MoveOn)


So you just assume they are as ignorant on the subject as you?



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 10:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Absolutely.

Just as I have every right to call them out when they do it, just as I have every right to protect and defend each and every right they are trying to eliminate.



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 10:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Pyle

Why would you possibly be protesting something then that is not only is legal but Constitutional?



Because legal doesnt always mean right and illegal doesnt always mean wrong. Good lord its like talking to a 5 year old.



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 10:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DBCowboy

What makes a protest anti-constitutional?




When people are protesting against constitutional elements and/or rights.


Because the Constitution is some unchanging document that has not be updated in 200+ years right?

List of amendments to the US constitution.



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 10:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DBCowboy

What makes a protest anti-constitutional?




When people are protesting against constitutional elements and/or rights.


Because the Constitution is some unchanging document that has not be updated in 200+ years right?

List of amendments to the US constitution.


You do realize that there is a process to amending the Constitution and it does not include mob rule, don't you?



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 10:32 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy



Just as I have every right to call them out when they do it, just as I have every right to protect and defend each and every right they are trying to eliminate.

Yes.
Just as long as you do not interfere with their rights in the process. Go for it.



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 10:33 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Sure but you can't claim that it is un-constitutional just because they are protesting against constitutional elements and/or rights.



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 10:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: DBCowboy

Sure but you can't claim that it is un-constitutional just because they are protesting against constitutional elements and/or rights.


Kind of ironic that you would endorse unconstitutional acts while doing it under the protection of the constitution.



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 10:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: abe froman

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: abe froman

I think threatening to run people over is a great argument myself, who doesn't want an excuse to kill and/or injure people with a car because they disagree with them? That's the American way. Our right to protest doesn't matter, we've got bodies to pile up!


Enough people have been pulled from their cars and viciously beaten, that if you are protesting by blocking the street you should expect to be run over.

Your rights end where mine begin.

I consider anyone blocking public roads as a threat to life and safety and I will respond with whatever force I can muster.

If as many people had been run over as have been brutally pulled from their cars and attacked,victimized, and beaten you'd quit standing in the roads altogether.



Agreed. In the off chance that anyone misinterpreted my previous reply about vehicular manslaughter, that is in the case of peaceful protesters.

In the circumstsnce that Abe outlined...definitely grey area.



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 10:39 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

How is a protest (misguided or not) unconstitutional?

edit on 4/14/2018 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 10:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DBCowboy

How is a protest (misguided or not) unconstitutional?


Protest is not unconstitutional.

What they are protesting might be.

Thus the irony.



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 10:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DBCowboy

How is a protest (misguided or not) unconstitutional?


Protest is not unconstitutional.

What they are protesting might be.

Thus the irony.


Protesting something which is unconstitutional is problematic? How so?

edit on 4/14/2018 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 10:45 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

The acts are not unconstitutional. That is where you are missing the mark.



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 10:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DBCowboy

How is a protest (misguided or not) unconstitutional?


Protest is not unconstitutional.

What they are protesting might be.

Thus the irony.


Protesting something which is unconstitutional is problematic? How so?


I never said problematic.

I said Ironic.



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 10:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: DBCowboy

The acts are not unconstitutional. That is where you are missing the mark.


What acts are you referring to?



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 10:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
What acts are you referring to?


Actually, both. It is constitutional to protest something that is constitutional.

You are the one who tried to call the act of protesting something constitutional, un-constitutional. That is incorrect.
edit on 14-4-2018 by daskakik because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 14 2018 @ 10:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Phage

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DBCowboy

How is a protest (misguided or not) unconstitutional?


Protest is not unconstitutional.

What they are protesting might be.

Thus the irony.


Protesting something which is unconstitutional is problematic? How so?


I never said problematic.

I said Ironic.

How is protesting something which may be unconstitutional ironic?
 




Protest is not unconstitutional.

What they are protesting might be.

Thus the irony.


edit on 4/14/2018 by Phage because: (no reason given)







 
31
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join