It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Fermy
originally posted by: johnnysixguns
originally posted by: Fermy
a reply to: Xcathdra
Nope. Lethal is lethal, you don't die any less from a fatal occurrence no matter how it happens.
Lethal and fatal are two different words, with two different definitions.
Lethal is defined as "sufficient to cause death".
Less lethal implies a thing is comparatively less efficient to cause death than another thing. Thus, less lethal.
So no, it's not an either/or situation.
Don't let your personal understanding of a word mess you up.
www.dictionary.com...
www.dictionary.com...
Don't let your lack of understanding of language mess you up.
And your hypothesis about the door? It closed on your ass.
Cambridge Analytica anyone..... just saying. That's right I pointed it out at the very beginning didn't I go figure.
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
assuming that this tail is verified .
then using the " logic " of various posters in various threads previous
the perpetrators of the attack on mr and miss Skripal
CANNOT be the US or UK govt - nor any agency associated with either
go figure
The precursor of BZ that is referred to in the public statements, commonly known as 3Q, was contained in the control sample prepared by the OPCW Lab in accordance with the existing quality control procedures. Otherwise it has nothing to do with the samples collected by the OPCW Team in Salisbury. This chemical was reported back to the OPCW by the two designated labs and the findings are duly reflected in the report.