It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: puzzlesphere
a reply to: howtonhawky
I refer you to this post (from another thread), which is a perfect example of what I was talking about.
The classic "all you non-believers will see... god is gonna git ya for not believing"!
originally posted by: toms54
a reply to: DpatC
Good question. You can ask him when you see him.
originally posted by: mysterioustranger
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: rickymouse
When the new Messiah shows up, he probably won't be named Jesus. On top of that, Jesus's name wasn't Jesus.
Mary named him after Joshua. Pronunciation is something like Yeshua. Jesus was a translation error. You can call him that. It makes no difference. He knows you are addressing him. God is not stupid
God is not stupid? You sure about that? They made humans, afterall.
You think God is a "they"?
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: rickymouse
When the new Messiah shows up, he probably won't be named Jesus. On top of that, Jesus's name wasn't Jesus.
Mary named him after Joshua. Pronunciation is something like Yeshua. Jesus was a translation error. You can call him that. It makes no difference. He knows you are addressing him. God is not stupid
God is not stupid? You sure about that? They made humans, afterall.
Did you expect Him to make them perfect like Him. With no choice. Would you like a robot slave wife. Maybe I shouldn't ask that? LOL!
originally posted by: toms54
a reply to: JimNasium
Your vast learning has driven you insane.
originally posted by: Blue Shift
originally posted by: JimNasium
WWJT??????? (What Would Jesus Type? )
WWJCDVD? (What Would Jean-Claude Van Damme Do?)
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: rickymouse
When the new Messiah shows up, he probably won't be named Jesus. On top of that, Jesus's name wasn't Jesus.
Mary named him after Joshua. Pronunciation is something like Yeshua. Jesus was a translation error. You can call him that. It makes no difference. He knows you are addressing him. God is not stupid
God is not stupid? You sure about that? They made humans, afterall.
Did you expect Him to make them perfect like Him. With no choice. Would you like a robot slave wife. Maybe I shouldn't ask that? LOL!
Then you must admit that it was an error since it isnt perfect unless that was the ultimate goal, in which that is pretty dumb.
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: rickymouse
When the new Messiah shows up, he probably won't be named Jesus. On top of that, Jesus's name wasn't Jesus.
Mary named him after Joshua. Pronunciation is something like Yeshua. Jesus was a translation error. You can call him that. It makes no difference. He knows you are addressing him. God is not stupid
God is not stupid? You sure about that? They made humans, afterall.
Did you expect Him to make them perfect like Him. With no choice. Would you like a robot slave wife. Maybe I shouldn't ask that? LOL!
Then you must admit that it was an error since it isnt perfect unless that was the ultimate goal, in which that is pretty dumb.
In answer to your question. No. That is perfection. To create all
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: rickymouse
When the new Messiah shows up, he probably won't be named Jesus. On top of that, Jesus's name wasn't Jesus.
Mary named him after Joshua. Pronunciation is something like Yeshua. Jesus was a translation error. You can call him that. It makes no difference. He knows you are addressing him. God is not stupid
God is not stupid? You sure about that? They made humans, afterall.
Did you expect Him to make them perfect like Him. With no choice. Would you like a robot slave wife. Maybe I shouldn't ask that? LOL!
Then you must admit that it was an error since it isnt perfect unless that was the ultimate goal, in which that is pretty dumb.
In answer to your question. No. That is perfection. To create all
No. Perfection is without error. Thus, it's perfect.
originally posted by: visitedbythem
You are wrong, and may not be able to understand. I would like to help you understand, but do not think you would take it right. You may not be capable of understanding. It is ok.
Those who think they know all, are untrainable. Please do not close your mind. Learn all you can. Then decide what perfection encompasses.
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: rickymouse
When the new Messiah shows up, he probably won't be named Jesus. On top of that, Jesus's name wasn't Jesus.
Mary named him after Joshua. Pronunciation is something like Yeshua. Jesus was a translation error. You can call him that. It makes no difference. He knows you are addressing him. God is not stupid
God is not stupid? You sure about that? They made humans, afterall.
Did you expect Him to make them perfect like Him. With no choice. Would you like a robot slave wife. Maybe I shouldn't ask that? LOL!
Then you must admit that it was an error since it isnt perfect unless that was the ultimate goal, in which that is pretty dumb.
In answer to your question. No. That is perfection. To create all
No. Perfection is without error. Thus, it's perfect.
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
You are wrong, and may not be able to understand. I would like to help you understand, but do not think you would take it right. You may not be capable of understanding. It is ok.
Those who think they know all, are untrainable. Please do not close your mind. Learn all you can. Then decide what perfection encompasses.
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: rickymouse
When the new Messiah shows up, he probably won't be named Jesus. On top of that, Jesus's name wasn't Jesus.
Mary named him after Joshua. Pronunciation is something like Yeshua. Jesus was a translation error. You can call him that. It makes no difference. He knows you are addressing him. God is not stupid
God is not stupid? You sure about that? They made humans, afterall.
Did you expect Him to make them perfect like Him. With no choice. Would you like a robot slave wife. Maybe I shouldn't ask that? LOL!
Then you must admit that it was an error since it isnt perfect unless that was the ultimate goal, in which that is pretty dumb.
In answer to your question. No. That is perfection. To create all
No. Perfection is without error. Thus, it's perfect.
It's always the "you must not be able to understand". Sorry, I do understand. Do you understand what the word perfect means? You cannot have perfection without error, that would defeat the purpose of the word perfection or perfect. Agree to this or no? This isn't semantics.
I am a very capable person to understand things. Try me.
EDIT: A funny tid bit about psychology, its very common of somebody to see somebody else challenge their views or beliefs and to think that person believes they know everything. I love to learn. I prefer to be right than wrong. So I challenge when necessary. Even myself. Closed mindedness is the opposite of my way of thinking.
originally posted by: visitedbythem
I prefer to know what the truth is, regardless.
What do you see yourself as?
An animal?
A Spirit in an animal body?
Let us go from there.
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
You are wrong, and may not be able to understand. I would like to help you understand, but do not think you would take it right. You may not be capable of understanding. It is ok.
Those who think they know all, are untrainable. Please do not close your mind. Learn all you can. Then decide what perfection encompasses.
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: rickymouse
When the new Messiah shows up, he probably won't be named Jesus. On top of that, Jesus's name wasn't Jesus.
Mary named him after Joshua. Pronunciation is something like Yeshua. Jesus was a translation error. You can call him that. It makes no difference. He knows you are addressing him. God is not stupid
God is not stupid? You sure about that? They made humans, afterall.
Did you expect Him to make them perfect like Him. With no choice. Would you like a robot slave wife. Maybe I shouldn't ask that? LOL!
Then you must admit that it was an error since it isnt perfect unless that was the ultimate goal, in which that is pretty dumb.
In answer to your question. No. That is perfection. To create all
No. Perfection is without error. Thus, it's perfect.
It's always the "you must not be able to understand". Sorry, I do understand. Do you understand what the word perfect means? You cannot have perfection without error, that would defeat the purpose of the word perfection or perfect. Agree to this or no? This isn't semantics.
I am a very capable person to understand things. Try me.
EDIT: A funny tid bit about psychology, its very common of somebody to see somebody else challenge their views or beliefs and to think that person believes they know everything. I love to learn. I prefer to be right than wrong. So I challenge when necessary. Even myself. Closed mindedness is the opposite of my way of thinking.
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
I prefer to know what the truth is, regardless.
What do you see yourself as?
An animal?
A Spirit in an animal body?
Let us go from there.
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
You are wrong, and may not be able to understand. I would like to help you understand, but do not think you would take it right. You may not be capable of understanding. It is ok.
Those who think they know all, are untrainable. Please do not close your mind. Learn all you can. Then decide what perfection encompasses.
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: rickymouse
When the new Messiah shows up, he probably won't be named Jesus. On top of that, Jesus's name wasn't Jesus.
Mary named him after Joshua. Pronunciation is something like Yeshua. Jesus was a translation error. You can call him that. It makes no difference. He knows you are addressing him. God is not stupid
God is not stupid? You sure about that? They made humans, afterall.
Did you expect Him to make them perfect like Him. With no choice. Would you like a robot slave wife. Maybe I shouldn't ask that? LOL!
Then you must admit that it was an error since it isnt perfect unless that was the ultimate goal, in which that is pretty dumb.
In answer to your question. No. That is perfection. To create all
No. Perfection is without error. Thus, it's perfect.
It's always the "you must not be able to understand". Sorry, I do understand. Do you understand what the word perfect means? You cannot have perfection without error, that would defeat the purpose of the word perfection or perfect. Agree to this or no? This isn't semantics.
I am a very capable person to understand things. Try me.
EDIT: A funny tid bit about psychology, its very common of somebody to see somebody else challenge their views or beliefs and to think that person believes they know everything. I love to learn. I prefer to be right than wrong. So I challenge when necessary. Even myself. Closed mindedness is the opposite of my way of thinking.
What is the goal of the question? I am a human. That is some form of animal. And concious could or could not be the soul. So definitively I am a human.
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
I prefer to know what the truth is, regardless.
What do you see yourself as?
An animal?
A Spirit in an animal body?
Let us go from there.
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
You are wrong, and may not be able to understand. I would like to help you understand, but do not think you would take it right. You may not be capable of understanding. It is ok.
Those who think they know all, are untrainable. Please do not close your mind. Learn all you can. Then decide what perfection encompasses.
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: rickymouse
When the new Messiah shows up, he probably won't be named Jesus. On top of that, Jesus's name wasn't Jesus.
Mary named him after Joshua. Pronunciation is something like Yeshua. Jesus was a translation error. You can call him that. It makes no difference. He knows you are addressing him. God is not stupid
God is not stupid? You sure about that? They made humans, afterall.
Did you expect Him to make them perfect like Him. With no choice. Would you like a robot slave wife. Maybe I shouldn't ask that? LOL!
Then you must admit that it was an error since it isnt perfect unless that was the ultimate goal, in which that is pretty dumb.
In answer to your question. No. That is perfection. To create all
No. Perfection is without error. Thus, it's perfect.
It's always the "you must not be able to understand". Sorry, I do understand. Do you understand what the word perfect means? You cannot have perfection without error, that would defeat the purpose of the word perfection or perfect. Agree to this or no? This isn't semantics.
I am a very capable person to understand things. Try me.
EDIT: A funny tid bit about psychology, its very common of somebody to see somebody else challenge their views or beliefs and to think that person believes they know everything. I love to learn. I prefer to be right than wrong. So I challenge when necessary. Even myself. Closed mindedness is the opposite of my way of thinking.
What is the goal of the question? I am a human. That is some form of animal. And concious could or could not be the soul. So definitively I am a human.
originally posted by: visitedbythem
Your answer is very telling.
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
I prefer to know what the truth is, regardless.
What do you see yourself as?
An animal?
A Spirit in an animal body?
Let us go from there.
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
You are wrong, and may not be able to understand. I would like to help you understand, but do not think you would take it right. You may not be capable of understanding. It is ok.
Those who think they know all, are untrainable. Please do not close your mind. Learn all you can. Then decide what perfection encompasses.
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: rickymouse
When the new Messiah shows up, he probably won't be named Jesus. On top of that, Jesus's name wasn't Jesus.
Mary named him after Joshua. Pronunciation is something like Yeshua. Jesus was a translation error. You can call him that. It makes no difference. He knows you are addressing him. God is not stupid
God is not stupid? You sure about that? They made humans, afterall.
Did you expect Him to make them perfect like Him. With no choice. Would you like a robot slave wife. Maybe I shouldn't ask that? LOL!
Then you must admit that it was an error since it isnt perfect unless that was the ultimate goal, in which that is pretty dumb.
In answer to your question. No. That is perfection. To create all
No. Perfection is without error. Thus, it's perfect.
It's always the "you must not be able to understand". Sorry, I do understand. Do you understand what the word perfect means? You cannot have perfection without error, that would defeat the purpose of the word perfection or perfect. Agree to this or no? This isn't semantics.
I am a very capable person to understand things. Try me.
EDIT: A funny tid bit about psychology, its very common of somebody to see somebody else challenge their views or beliefs and to think that person believes they know everything. I love to learn. I prefer to be right than wrong. So I challenge when necessary. Even myself. Closed mindedness is the opposite of my way of thinking.
What is the goal of the question? I am a human. That is some form of animal. And concious could or could not be the soul. So definitively I am a human.
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
Your answer is very telling.
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
I prefer to know what the truth is, regardless.
What do you see yourself as?
An animal?
A Spirit in an animal body?
Let us go from there.
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
You are wrong, and may not be able to understand. I would like to help you understand, but do not think you would take it right. You may not be capable of understanding. It is ok.
Those who think they know all, are untrainable. Please do not close your mind. Learn all you can. Then decide what perfection encompasses.
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: rickymouse
When the new Messiah shows up, he probably won't be named Jesus. On top of that, Jesus's name wasn't Jesus.
Mary named him after Joshua. Pronunciation is something like Yeshua. Jesus was a translation error. You can call him that. It makes no difference. He knows you are addressing him. God is not stupid
God is not stupid? You sure about that? They made humans, afterall.
Did you expect Him to make them perfect like Him. With no choice. Would you like a robot slave wife. Maybe I shouldn't ask that? LOL!
Then you must admit that it was an error since it isnt perfect unless that was the ultimate goal, in which that is pretty dumb.
In answer to your question. No. That is perfection. To create all
No. Perfection is without error. Thus, it's perfect.
It's always the "you must not be able to understand". Sorry, I do understand. Do you understand what the word perfect means? You cannot have perfection without error, that would defeat the purpose of the word perfection or perfect. Agree to this or no? This isn't semantics.
I am a very capable person to understand things. Try me.
EDIT: A funny tid bit about psychology, its very common of somebody to see somebody else challenge their views or beliefs and to think that person believes they know everything. I love to learn. I prefer to be right than wrong. So I challenge when necessary. Even myself. Closed mindedness is the opposite of my way of thinking.
What is the goal of the question? I am a human. That is some form of animal. And concious could or could not be the soul. So definitively I am a human.
If it tells you I work with definitive's but explore theories and ideas, that would be it.