It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody
It has not been said that trump in not under investigation. He is.
A subject of the investigation is ummm under investigation.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Phage
Some folks are under the impression that every conversation trump had with Cohen was privileged. Or that every conversation someone has with their lawyer is privileged.
That's an error.
The attorney-client privilege protects most communications between clients and their lawyers. But, according to the crime-fraud exception to the privilege, a client’s communication to her attorney isn’t privileged if she made it with the intention of committing or covering up a crime or fraud. Because the attorney-client privilege belongs to the client, the client’s intent determines whether the exception applies. Most courts will apply the exception even if the attorney had no knowledge of, and didn’t participate in, the actual crime or fraud.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody
More crystal ball stuff.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
It doesnt exactly work that way. The government has to have evidence of a crime (IE probable cause) to obtain a warrant. You cant just sift thru documents in hopes of finding evidence of a crime. Search warrants have to be specific and the bar gets higher when its a lawyer.
Trumps privilege stands. That is reinforced by the fact Trump is not involved with what is going on with Cohen.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: soberbacchus
i understand the president is not the target therefore the govt has no right to communications between trump and cohen as they share no crime
the special master will exclude all of the presidents info
Right. And any OTHER evidence they find of OTHER crimes is fully fair game and legal to pursue, including the NY AGs obligation to forward any evidence to Mueller that might be relevant to his investigation.
random cohen crime does not invalidate trumps privilege
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody
Sure. But that doesn't clear trump from anything uncovered in this raid. Not at all.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: soberbacchus
Right. And any OTHER evidence they find of OTHER crimes is fully fair game and legal to pursue, including the NY AGs obligation to forward any evidence to Mueller that might be relevant to his investigation.
no
the special master will hold privilege for any clients cohen had that are not involved with this alleged crime
the special master will stop the "fishing expedition" you expect to occur
originally posted by: shooterbrody
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody
Sure. But that doesn't clear trump from anything uncovered in this raid. Not at all.
The ny feds won't ever see anything from trump, or do you have evidence trump and cohen committed a crime together?
The Odds they haven't conspired to commit or cover up frauds or crimes in the past decade are ZERO IMO.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: soberbacchus
I think you do not understand who the warrant was served on.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: soberbacchus
The Odds they haven't conspired to commit or cover up frauds or crimes in the past decade are ZERO IMO.
So you also have no basic understanding of the federal statute of limitations as well, or does decade have a different meaning in your world?
To assume that Cohen and Trump only engaged in crimes or frauds a decade ago is a weird assumption.
The Odds they haven't conspired to commit or cover up frauds or crimes in the past decade are ZERO IMO.