It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In the West we are in the right.
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
Why was the Patriot Act rolled out 26 days after 9/11? (Hint: it took longer than 26 days to write it).
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
Why was Afghanistan whacked 45 days after 9/11? (Hint: it wasn't about retribution because they provided training nests for ex-CIA employee Osama bin Laden's 'the base')
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
Why, after global protests in every Western country not to attack, did the coalition of the willing whack Iraq in 2003? (Hint: It wasn't to rid the country of Donald Rumsfelds long time friend and one-time US ally, Saddam Hussein)
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
The answer to all 3 questions is actually exactly the same.
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
Libya was a little different, it was not geographically strategic - still the libian citizens were 'saved' from 'evil' Qaddafi because Qaddafi wanted to move away from the petro-dollar and revert to the gold standard. Hillary was elated to discover that his corpse was dragged through the streets with a firepole shoved up his ass.
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
[In the voice of the soup nazi] - "no more peace for you"
LOL.
In the West we are in the right. We make our citizens happy enough in the main to want to live. They have freedom, even freedom to be naughty and given second chances.
Considering France and the UK pushed for attacking Libya and took the lead the old petro dollar excuse doesnt work.
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
OK - I don't want to drift off topic here but your comments about my 3 questions are far too MSM orientated in their delivery and contents - and being the very suspicious alternative thinker that I am, we will not agree on your thoughts versus's mine as I am not looking at those events the same way you are - I see them as jump points created by the west so as to infiltrate the middle east for oil reserves.
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
I find it paradoxical that ISIS was able to not only keep the US at bay, but they managed to start oil production and sell the sh!t as well. That simply does not happen on this plane of existence without the blessing of the house-of-war.
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
ISIS and the brand new Toyota Hilux's - a wonderfully created, in HD and with all the latest IT tech, threat that all humans should fear.
ISIS groups may be getting the vehicles several ways, the ABC News report said. One theory posits that the vehicles are being stolen from Syrian rebels or other sources overseas and smuggled into the conflict zone. Another is that ISIS sympathizers are simply buying up the trucks and shipping them to the militants.
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
Then Putin comes along, and whacks ISIS and the US complains that their positions are being hit.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: DerBeobachter
riight.. However your snark doesnt change the fact it was a France / UK led push for Libyan intervention.
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: DerBeobachter
riight.. However your snark doesnt change the fact it was a France / UK led push for Libyan intervention.
Bah-- IMF, World Bank, and US Aid led that charge.
I hardly believe it, did you just admit NATO destroyed Libya?