It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Russia can't stop chemical weapons attacks in countries they oversee? Why?

page: 3
4
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 8 2018 @ 02:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ophiuchus 13
Why cannot the Super power of Russia, who is working directly with the Syrian regime prevent these ignorant chemical attacks in the region ... What if any is or could be the benefit


Exactly, what would be the benefit for Russia?
Nothing.

What would be the benefit for Assad?
Nothing.

Those with an anti Assad or anti Russian agenda, however..

In economic crime you follow the money, in geopolitics you ask who benefits.
And it sure ain't Russia.




posted on Apr, 8 2018 @ 02:44 PM
link   
a reply to: DupontDeux

So it was fault of the West in your perception?



posted on Apr, 8 2018 @ 02:48 PM
link   
Interesting thing about the rebellion... when it started it was overwhelmingly Syrian... now its mostly foreign fighters.

When you look at it in that light, who benefits the most from a chemical attack and that is probably the culprit.



posted on Apr, 8 2018 @ 02:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ophiuchus 13
a reply to: DupontDeux

So it was fault of the West in your perception?


Or it could be the rebels themselves.

These are lots not much different from their (official) ISIS counterparts; they demonstrably have no scruples taking out hordes of civilians whenever it serves them.

And it serves them way better, than it would serve Assad (or Russia or Iran).




top topics
 
4
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join