It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Should you be cool with your 17-20 year old circling Walmart for hours at midnight armed???
originally posted by: Mandroid7
a reply to: intrepid
Here's what I think. No fn gun owner that wants to keep their rights is going to walk around Wamart and scare people to help them keep them.
This is a smear campaign
originally posted by: CB328
Should you be cool with your 17-20 year old circling Walmart for hours at midnight armed???
No sane person would, which is why ATS is fine with it.
originally posted by: Krakatoa
So, we've gone from "dorks" to "stupid" to "insane" in only 6 pages here?
Is that the level of sanity evaluation needed to strip them of their rights now that we have deemed them not sane for exercising their rights, and not breaking any laws?
And some wonder why we cannot have intelligent conversation about these things when the escalation of hyperbole becomes the main talking point from a certain segment of society.
Really? How do you know that? Do you have some special telepathic insight into their fantasies? Any documentation to prove that? Or did you just make it up based on what you THINK their fantasies are?
originally posted by: intrepid
a reply to: Krakatoa
Does "unwise" work better for you? That's my feeling.
originally posted by: daskakik
originally posted by: Krakatoa
So, we've gone from "dorks" to "stupid" to "insane" in only 6 pages here?
Seems you have.
Is that the level of sanity evaluation needed to strip them of their rights now that we have deemed them not sane for exercising their rights, and not breaking any laws?
Who said anything about stripping rights? OK I jumped from page 2 to the end because of the above.
And some wonder why we cannot have intelligent conversation about these things when the escalation of hyperbole becomes the main talking point from a certain segment of society.
From the outside looking in it looks like you are the one that took it there.
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Mandroid7
Ask yourself what party would carry guns to a place they knew would get negative attention towards firearms and you will have your answer.
According to ATA it's people exercising their constitutional rights. So what do you think?
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: Krakatoa
I saw your posts on page 1. You leaped into the hyperbole from the start. I had that much knowledge of the thread before jumping in.
originally posted by: Mandroid7
I can speak for myself...
I don't need your liberal insanity translation for your team points game.