It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: DupontDeux
If China is "ripping us off" to the tune of $400 billion @ year, as the President states, let's quit doing business with them. If your mechanic is charging too much, get another one. Right?
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: NobodiesNormal
If we feel that China is attempting to destroy our free-market, wouldn't it be prudent to simply ban all Chinese goods that are priced artificially low?
originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
Tariffs are just his tool to either slow the trade imbalance or open Chinese markets with fair trade.
Just like threatening to pull out of NAFTA wasn't to raise new tariffs but to negotiate a better deal.
Just like threatening to 86 the trade agreement with South Korea produced massively underreported con cessions from Seoul.
We have enormous leverage with a multi-trillion dollar consumer market. We just never use it because Wall St. only cares about cheap labor and profit margin, not the US industrial base or American workers. And Wall St owns the press (and more than a few politicians).
Chinese President Xi Jinping said Tuesday China will significantly lower the import tariffs for vehicles and reduce import tariffs for some other products this year...
The country will work hard to import more products that are competitive and needed by the Chinese people, he said.
China will also seek faster progress toward joining the WTO Government Procurement Agreement, according to the president.
"China does not seek trade surplus; we have a genuine desire to increase imports and achieve greater balance of international payments under the current account," he said.
originally posted by: RadioRobert
originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
Tariffs are just his tool to either slow the trade imbalance or open Chinese markets with fair trade.
Just like threatening to pull out of NAFTA wasn't to raise new tariffs but to negotiate a better deal.
Just like threatening to 86 the trade agreement with South Korea produced massively underreported con cessions from Seoul.
We have enormous leverage with a multi-trillion dollar consumer market. We just never use it because Wall St. only cares about cheap labor and profit margin, not the US industrial base or American workers. And Wall St owns the press (and more than a few politicians).
Don't look now, but ...
China reducing tariffs; opening markets
Chinese President Xi Jinping said Tuesday China will significantly lower the import tariffs for vehicles and reduce import tariffs for some other products this year...
The country will work hard to import more products that are competitive and needed by the Chinese people, he said.
China will also seek faster progress toward joining the WTO Government Procurement Agreement, according to the president.
"China does not seek trade surplus; we have a genuine desire to increase imports and achieve greater balance of international payments under the current account," he said.
Looks like we have progress toward a new deal. Now we drop them a sop, and both sides will smile and claim win-win.
originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: luthier
Yes, reducing the trade deficit is a terrible deal for the American economy. Shame on him.
originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: luthier
Well, let's wait longed than a month for something to bear fruit, shall we? After all, holding a deficit, we feel less heat while disturbing the status quo. And if not, you can take solace in all your posts where the deficit is great for us. I fully expect you to cheer him if the deficit stays the same or rises.
originally posted by: Flanker86
The US, will neither win a trade war against China, nor will it have unilateral concessions from North Korea, and will not manage a new Russia-China split as some EUSSR Eurocrats are hoping.
... officials who push for it will end up being a huge failure and will have to be fired at some point in the future ...