It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Perfectenemy
Why should i lie or hoax anything on a platform like ATS? I don't make money of Q and i post exclusively in here without any positive benefits for myself. Quite the contrary you and others ridicule me on an almost daily basis. Besides if i told you who my "source" is you wouldn't believe it anyways. It's not Q or anyone in their vicinity in case you are wondering. We just happen to share a common goal and that's all.
You do not have an inside source and you cannot provide one?
So you were lying.
originally posted by: imthegoat
Then why don't you do something to prove it all a hoax rather than state your opinions? You consistently reply to threads offering, most of the time, just as little or less information than the OP. Ideas are presented, it's the naysayers who are in charge of proving it wrong, yes?
originally posted by: introvert
I've done no such thing. Do not misrepresent what I have said. That is dishonest. I have not said "everyone", nor have I said it was nothing but a LARP. It could also be a complete hoax.
originally posted by: vinifalou
a reply to: Perfectenemy
Just read that and thought wasn't even worth to share, lol, that's how bad it is.
MSM pls
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
originally posted by: imthegoat
Then why don't you do something to prove it all a hoax rather than state your opinions? You consistently reply to threads offering, most of the time, just as little or less information than the OP. Ideas are presented, it's the naysayers who are in charge of proving it wrong, yes?
If an idea is presented 'Burden of Concept' is on the presenter to demonstrate it to be a good idea. Then detractors can argue how its a bad idea.
If an 'fact' is presented 'Burden of Proof' is on the presenter to demonstrate it to be true.
If 'proper rules' of argument and debate are to be adhered to that is.
GBU-43/B MOAB
GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB)
Diameter 103 cm (40.5 in)
Filling H-6
Filling weight 8,500 kg (18,700 lb)
Blast yield 11 tons TNT (46 GJ)
Magnitude 3.908656241 M
Energy (Joule) 46.024 GJ (×109J)
TNT equivalent 11 t
originally posted by: HopeLoveWorld
a reply to: Perfectenemy
Ignore them. They are trying to upset you and distract you. Just ignore the posts and don't respond. Introvert has wasted enough of your time, and everyone elses.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
originally posted by: imthegoat
Then why don't you do something to prove it all a hoax rather than state your opinions? You consistently reply to threads offering, most of the time, just as little or less information than the OP. Ideas are presented, it's the naysayers who are in charge of proving it wrong, yes?
If an idea is presented 'Burden of Concept' is on the presenter to demonstrate it to be a good idea. Then detractors can argue how its a bad idea.
If an 'fact' is presented 'Burden of Proof' is on the presenter to demonstrate it to be true.
If 'proper rules' of argument and debate are to be adhered to that is.
originally posted by: crankyoldman
Well that's three pages of utter pointless drivel going over the same exact topic using the same exact reasoning developing in the same exact way it has before.
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
If the people you present the evidence to have no idea what are you talking about because they didn't do anything to inform themselves before hand what happens then?
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: CoramDeo
Good info! So much of this is way above my paygrade. But from a lay-person's perspective, it seems that Q is linking most of the military crashes and the Chinese Satellite crash, to a warfare that's being conducted in the electronic hacking realm.
Naturally, no country would admit that another country did this, or even could do this. It would quickly lead to real war.
It concerns me that similar control chips might be in domestic airliners. We do NOT want to see this (hypothetical) electronic cyber war cross that threshold.