a reply to: Skyfloating
Both the Political Party's are big cults. That's science
And without people waking up to how this stuff works there is no true universal awakening.
Cult of Personality they both use.
And then there's this Q thing. It's rallied behind a specific politician. It constantly says "TRUST US" (while supposedly being part of said
politicians propaganda team making this even worse). It insists on blind faith and loyalty (maybe that's not his fault overtly). "Q", which mostly
poses the latest news in the form of questions, we're not supposed to question who it really is, what its motives really are, or the 'contextual
legitimacy' of the politicians / officials / policies surrounding said head politician.
Now one could surmise its just a Live Action Role Playing game, but its followers insist its a "movement".
Now if anyone is squirming over this assessment, well then this is for you. All I've done is explained this thing in political / social science terms.
My simplified definition of: Modern Propaganda is the science of mass persuasion and / or diversion.
Now this Q thing, if the goal is a partisan supremacy struggle then perfect. But this thing saving the world or whatever, its towing Neocon Agenda
action items. Its all about "exposing" "liberals" / Democrat's, but "conservatives" / Republican's are getting the soft pass if not being told to be
TRUSTED. It's propping up little tyrants like Sessions. It's taking credit for the collective works of 'exposure' across the board as it suits itself,
much of this work is decades in the making (this part might not be its fault however).
Now it definitely fits the "PERSUASION" mold of my Propaganda definition, which isnt inherently a bad thing as who doesnt try to persuade.
Whether or not "propaganda" is to even receive a negative connotation could be a most precarious debate, about one source to the next.
But for me a dead tell tale sign of diabolical is when a source deliberately engages in "DIVERSION" (misdirection). When a source sets about keeping
people from realizing the key angle of a story that would warrant action, is but one example of this. Another choice one would be the collective
tunnelvision the MSM has kept the US in, especially about itself / ourselves on the international stage (note that Fox is MSM too). The entire sports
industry fits into this, for example. Or like how the SJW's put all the evils of corporation into the laps of everyday white folks, because CEO's are
mostly white afterall so lets blame all whites (which keeps the CEO's in the shadows per se). I could go on and on with these and I'll bet all of you
So in that kind of vein, does Q engage in propagandistic diversion? Well the tongue twister crossword puzzle BS (that drives me up a wall, but to each
his own) could certainly be such a thing. It could also just be part of the clever LARP game.
Q sure does want us obsessing about Hollywood etc celebrity types and their personal lives. Could this be a version (for the "right") of that thing I
was saying the SJW's do to misdirect people?
One thing I have NOT noticed Q get into since I've been watching is entrenched financial / Central Bankster interests. Going after the tech giants has
always been one of my primary action items, so I have put that work on the "Pro" side of the list. But what about the Banksters and their criminal
activities (whether "legal" or not)? You tell me.
What about the discussion of propaganda / psychology / social psychology itself? You absolutely cant truly wake people up without it. Something thats
always stood out to me about MSM types is the overt feigned denial about what they do as being propaganda. In their world its like someone walking
into NASA and talking about astrology LOL. No of course this could be excused as they hate to think of themselves as propagandists, but I insist it
goes much deeper than that. Since it is dark propaganda of course they cant teach people how to see thru propaganda. To even mention the word might
trigger some people to go and actually look up the subject, for starters. In the end they just cant have people waking up because they're job is to
prevent it. So how to read between it just isnt going to be discussed the best they can manage not to.
Does Q exhibit that sort of tendency? You tell me.
Now the thing that I finally noticed in a timely fashion that I cant let go of is, after the Syria Bombing last week (that totally contradicted Q
expectations about that situation, by the way). No Q drops for quite a tick. Then, I do believe it was the first one following it, contained "SPARROW
RED". Which of course sent you all into guessing game land. You guys like chasing "crumbs", well go check the dates. That was about the same day that
"Red Sparrow" (new Hollyweird film) was being released, although the precise days I havent looked up now in hindsight.
(Or this Pelosi NK trip, DOES IT ACTUALLY MATTER???)
So this last part alone would lead us to conclude...
-This all just is a LARP game by someone well up on the news etc etc, and whatever he happens to check out (even movie releases) he posts like some
Twitter/Facebook junkie that has to tell people everytime they take a dump.
-This is a unique in presentation, yet deep down same old same old diversion / Perception
campaign (Trump's buddy and all that).
-This is a subversion campaign that isnt actually connected to Trump (CIA asshats like "Anonymous").
-There really is something sooper secret about that Red Sparrow film (which I watched and nothing stood out to me), and its worthy of being the
'first' thing mentioned after Q was wrong about what to expect with Syria.
-lemme know any dichotomies I missed right here-
Now maybe it s just a LARP. And if it is you can all be honest with yourselves about it, but still enjoy playing the game just the same? Its only your
credibility / sanity / principles on the line the more you accept it into your heart (as they say).
edit on 20-4-2018 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)