It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
This is what I'm digging into now..
Anybody wanna join in?
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: MostlyReading
Okay so whats a reasonable timeline to hold him to it? At what point do we call BS that it was a bogus prediction? How many days / months / years do we wait for that gospel?
You've already made up your mind that it's BS.
Be honest.
I honestly keep telling myself I'm done looking at it, but its an interesting social experiment indeed, this big petri dish "Q" has cooked up, like so many other modern trends in social / political communications and the effects it has on people. SO I probably should sit back and just observe, but I'm gonzo bebe, while the rest of the forum is more boring lately with so many people now spending most of their ATS time in here and so many stories that would be OP's in ATS getting dropped and left in here where nobody herein is willing to take hardly any of it and run OP's off them.
As with any big thing that demands attention, careful what you wish for. Because now you've got mine.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
originally posted by: tiredoflooking
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
You know he didnt give time for release.
Disinfo is part of his game.
Q disinfo'ing his own followers?
You really shouldnt say that.
And if he did then that's a preemptive damage control for being a farce that posts farcical BS.
I MEAN just imagine if any other 'news source' (as for all intensive purposes thats about all Q is) openly said "we engage in disinfo of our own readers" the outrage that would pour out in this site. They dont even say that, but we 'all' know it around here and outrage about it anyways. But then, according to you, Q says it, and its to be treated as a stroke of brilliance?
Maybe I'm misinterpreting whatever Q meant by "disinfo", by the way you're explaining it?
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
originally posted by: tiredoflooking
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
You know he didnt give time for release.
Disinfo is part of his game.
Q disinfo'ing his own followers?
You really shouldnt say that.
And if he did then that's a preemptive damage control for being a farce that posts farcical BS.
I MEAN just imagine if any other 'news source' (as for all intensive purposes thats about all Q is) openly said "we engage in disinfo of our own readers" the outrage that would pour out in this site. They dont even say that, but we 'all' know it around here and outrage about it anyways. But then, according to you, Q says it, and its to be treated as a stroke of brilliance?
Maybe I'm misinterpreting whatever Q meant by "disinfo", by the way you're explaining it?
The day is finally here.
After 4 years in the works, multiple name changes, and numerous launch delays, the U.S. Agency for International Development is finally unveiling the Global Development Lab, which it hopes will bring greater innovation to meeting the goal of ending extreme poverty and “take game-changing solutions to more than 200 million people.”
The event will take place in New York, with Hillary Clinton delivering the keynote address, following an internal launch and a USAID town hall discussion earlier this week in Washington, D.C.
The lab will initially focus on 6 thematic areas: food security and nutrition, maternal and child survival, energy access, sustainable water solutions, child literacy, and “connected technologies.” Devex first reported last August on plans to merge the USAID’s Office of Science and Technology with the Office of Innovation and Development Alliances to create a new platform for innovation, still referred to at that time as “The Institute.”
With the exception of a few more details, USAID has kept its plans for the new initiative under tight wraps. The launch of the Global Development Lab — and the agency’s public outreach preceding it — answers some questions about what the new platform will actually do, while raising some others.
The Foggy Bottom Smackdown, as it is known in Washington, quietly unfolded in recent weeks. Round One went to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for taking away power that administrators of a rival agency, the U.S. Agency for International Development, had managed to hold onto during the Bush administration. Even worse, Rajiv Shah, the new head of USAID, is a Hillary “minion,” as one insider puts it, who has hardly put up a fight.
One year after the Haiti earthquake, Clinton and Shah are shining a spotlight on the disaster. The Washington fight over foreign assistance may seem arcane in contrast to the magnitude of the tragedy—focusing on flow charts and budget lines—but it affects millions of people around the world. Luckily, some specialists, both inside and outside of government, are pushing for more autonomy for the development agency.
They should fight harder, because “the evisceration of USAID,” as one development expert calls it, has serious consequences. Despite the rhetoric of administration officials, development work is being transformed from a mechanism that pulls people out of poverty into a tool of military intervention. That is Hillary’s goal, and she should be stopped.
When aid money is managed wisely, people who live in the Democratic Republic of Congo and in other marginalized countries directly benefit. When funds are managed poorly, the money goes to less-deserving regions or is squandered on bad projects, often in countries where American troops are located. Not that USAID’s Shah is complaining. He joined the administration as an undersecretary of Agriculture in 2009 and soon traveled with Clinton to Kenya, helping to write a speech that she gave that fall in New York.
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
Hmm. The US is not attacking Syria right now. Edit: Israel.
originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: IAMTAT
Speaking of which How deep did we get into Hillary speaking at that coven earlier this month? It might behoove us to find out what other covens she may have spoken with over the years. If any of them are connected to Blackrock Saturn cults black mood rings or anything else Q may have pointed us towards