It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump: We Will Guard Our Border With Our Military

page: 3
44
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 3 2018 @ 01:03 PM
link   


I don't care if the Constitution forbids it. It needs to be done and he is doing it.


Maybe the 1st, 2nd and 4th, for starters, could be forgotten also. I bet many would love it.




posted on Apr, 3 2018 @ 01:04 PM
link   
We should put irremovable tracking bracelets on every damn one of them.



posted on Apr, 3 2018 @ 01:04 PM
link   
Errm so that $700 billion increase in military funding, ey..?

You can buy a lot of wall with $700 billion...



posted on Apr, 3 2018 @ 01:05 PM
link   



I don't care if the Constitution forbids it. It needs to be done and he is doing it.

Trump ~ 2020!


Just quoted this in case you delete.

Thought the constitution was kind of important?

Only if you agree with it?



posted on Apr, 3 2018 @ 01:06 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

from your link



Mexican authorities responded to Trump’s Sunday threat to kill NAFTA by pledging to disband the caravan and allow some transmitters to apply for asylum in Mexico.

It appears the "Mexican authorities" have some common sense.
It also appears immigration has become a "national security" issue because of congresses inaction.



posted on Apr, 3 2018 @ 01:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: roadgravel



I don't care if the Constitution forbids it. It needs to be done and he is doing it.


Maybe the 1st, 2nd and 4th, for starters, could be forgotten also. I bet many would love it.


while I disagree with what he said, if we are being honest the 1st, 2nd, and 4th have been under assault for quite some time, more than a few on both sides of the aisle would cheer the official shredding of the bill of rights.



posted on Apr, 3 2018 @ 01:08 PM
link   
a reply to: TinySickTears




Only if you agree with it?


That seems to be the way it is viewed in the US currently.



posted on Apr, 3 2018 @ 01:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lurker1
This is why I elected him. He acts instead of talking about it.

I don't care if the Constitution forbids it. It needs to be done and he is doing it.

Trump ~ 2020!


Pfft, it’s just a piece of paper right?

Cmon, where’re ATS’s resident constitutionalists?



posted on Apr, 3 2018 @ 01:11 PM
link   
I don't trust Donald Trump any more than I trust illegal immigrants. Even if he does build this thing he's got ulterior motives. TPTB would never allow anyone they don't control in the WH. You can bet on that.



posted on Apr, 3 2018 @ 01:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Irishhaf

while I disagree with what he said, if we are being honest the 1st, 2nd, and 4th have been under assault for quite some time, more than a few on both sides of the aisle would cheer the official shredding of the bill of rights.


No kidding. A bit scary.



posted on Apr, 3 2018 @ 01:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: bender151
a reply to: Shamrock6

Or, to put it another way, Obama already did this and you didn't care.


Obama used Guard troops.

You'll notice that I said "federal troops" in the comment you're replying to.

So no, your strawman would be inaccurate. I would care very much, regardless of who sits behind the fancy desk.



posted on Apr, 3 2018 @ 01:13 PM
link   
a reply to: eNumbra

It appears a self identified non government group intends to invade the usa as their published statements indicate.
POTUS as CIC has a job to defend our nation.



posted on Apr, 3 2018 @ 01:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: MisterSpock

originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: Xcalibur254

Just think of the panic that would ensue if Obama had talked about deploying federal troops internally (Jade Helm comes to mind).

But now it's a great idea.

Lulz


Isn't the key difference in who they are deployed against? That being US citizens vs illegals compromising our border.


Using federal troops to enforce law is using federal troops to enforce law.



posted on Apr, 3 2018 @ 01:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: eNumbra

originally posted by: Lurker1
This is why I elected him. He acts instead of talking about it.

I don't care if the Constitution forbids it. It needs to be done and he is doing it.

Trump ~ 2020!


Pfft, it’s just a piece of paper right?

Cmon, where’re ATS’s resident constitutionalists?


Busy or Not interested.
Apparently



posted on Apr, 3 2018 @ 01:15 PM
link   
The problem is.

There are any number of places they can cross.

My money is an off ramp close to California.



posted on Apr, 3 2018 @ 01:15 PM
link   
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

If it works as well as the levies they built around New Orleans, the US is in real trouble.



posted on Apr, 3 2018 @ 01:15 PM
link   
a reply to: Shamrock6

Using federal troops to stop an invasion is the CIC's job.



posted on Apr, 3 2018 @ 01:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lurker1
This is why I elected him. He acts instead of talking about it.

I don't care if the Constitution forbids it. It needs to be done and he is doing it.

Trump ~ 2020!


At least you're honest about being loyal to a person rather than a nation.



posted on Apr, 3 2018 @ 01:16 PM
link   
This seems so manufactured to get press coverage and hopes it produces an outcry after they are stopped at the border.



posted on Apr, 3 2018 @ 01:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Shamrock6




At least you're honest about being loyal to a person rather than a nation.


What does that say about the people supporting premeditation to break sovereign US law?
edit on 3-4-2018 by neo96 because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
44
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join