Trump: We Will Guard Our Border With Our Military

originally posted by: eNumbra

originally posted by: Lurker1
This is why I elected him. He acts instead of talking about it.

I don't care if the Constitution forbids it. It needs to be done and he is doing it.

Trump ~ 2020!

Pfft, it’s just a piece of paper right?

Cmon, where’re ATS’s resident constitutionalists?

Constitution doesn't say anything about putting our millitary to police an international border.

1 - It's not domestic
2 - This rule ONLY applies to the ARMY and AIR FORCE. No reserves, no guard... even if it was domestic.

The law was put in place to stop the government from using the ARMY against it's citizens. This is far from any of that.

It's not domestic!

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: eriktheawful

And the majority of those 1500 asylum seekers aren't a threat. So why are they being met with lethal force?

Met with lethal force?? What are you on about? Has the order gone out to use lethal force then? Didn't hear that.

Lots of debate here. But if your not a United States Citizen, your opinions really are moot. As a citizen, I recognize the need to secure our borders. That is unless your looking for the whole US to look like Southern California. Losing your jobs to monetary refugees willing to work for peanuts and live four families to a house, and be always on the watch for threatening MS13 shakedowns and murders.

a reply to: soberbacchus

lol border security is a law enforcement function lol
immigration and naturalization is a law enforcement function
protecting our borders is a military function
a group of 1500 foreign nationals making demands on the usa government is a threat

congress should have gotten off of their asses

Honestly I think this is just a repeat of what happened in Europe with these asylum seekers crossing borders with no end in sight and now Europe is flooded with rapes and crimes galore.

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: soberbacchus

"Posse Comitatus" has nothing to do with sending troops to defend the international border.

Will they be deployed on US Soil?

Posse Comitatus expressly forbids a sitting president from using the military for law enforcement, and border security is a law enforcement function.

and border security is a law enforcement function.

No , it is not. Law enforcement is local and State. Border Security is Federal.

This "caravan" of Mexicans have NO INTENTION of storming or crossing our border. The group that arranged this PROTEST just want to walk up to THEIR BORDER to get attention. Fox News snd Alex Jones have YOU fooled.....again.

originally posted by: xuenchen
June 2014 article..

Report: 90% of illegals skip immigration court appearances; 135,000 will go missing

Ninety percent of the mostly-teen illegal immigrants flooding over the Mexico-U.S. border won't show up for their immigration court hearing, meaning at least 135,000 of the youths will simply vanish into the country this year alone, according to a key House committee chairman.

😃

Lets call this by its real names... Human Trafficking, Drug Trafficking, Sex trafficking, Child Sex Trafficking, Forced Labor, Debt Bondage,
Domestic Servitude. ETC

The left and Hollywood make it seem so innocent... Undocumented immigrants..Just people trying to do better in life...

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: soberbacchus

"Posse Comitatus" has nothing to do with sending troops to defend the international border.

Will they be deployed on US Soil?

Posse Comitatus expressly forbids a sitting president from using the military for law enforcement, and border security is a law enforcement function.

Not when our military is protecting our borders! It is refreshing though to see so many of you trying to brush up on the Constitution.
Until the next thread where many of you mentioning the Constitution to protect invaders are against it over the 2nd?

originally posted by: WarPig1939
Honestly I think this is just a repeat of what happened in Europe with these asylum seekers crossing borders with no end in sight and now Europe is flooded with rapes and crimes galore.

And most EU countries have even moved tanks and support to their borders to stop the "refugees"
Seems like they are a step ahead of the US...

originally posted by: Plotus
But if your not a United States Citizen, your opinions really are moot.

Even if you are a citizen your opinions are also moot because it isn't your call.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: eriktheawful

And the majority of those 1500 asylum seekers aren't a threat. So why are they being met with lethal force?

Met with lethal force?? What are you on about? Has the order gone out to use lethal force then? Didn't hear that.

Jesus, yes, where the US military go, they are a "Lethal Force". It is their entire premise.

This is positive results, instant deports no kangaroo courts, just a bottle of water and an arm and finger pointing the other way.

a reply to: TinySickTears

Border security has worked well for decades hasn't it ?

👋👌

originally posted by: seeker1963

Not when our military is protecting our borders! It is refreshing though to see so many of you trying to brush up on the Constitution.
Until the next thread where many of you mentioning the Constitution to protect invaders are against it over the 2nd?

Where do people think the preds have come from as they fly our borders, plus nothing says the national guard can't do this too.

a reply to: Xcalibur254

(2) A condition described in this paragraph is a condition that--
(A) so hinders the execution of the laws of a State or possession, as applicable, and of the United States within that State or possession, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State or possession are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or
(B) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: eriktheawful

And the majority of those 1500 asylum seekers aren't a threat. So why are they being met with lethal force?

They are a threatening shade of brown.

That statement is why people can't have a rational discussion. There is always some racist-minded person that projects their own fears and bias onto anyone that opposes a viewpoint.

The people flowing through Mexico right now on their way to our border may be brown, but that has nothing to do with what this move is, security-wise. Sheeesh!

This is purely a foreign related issue. Nothing to do with deploying troops against citizens. This would be for illegal aliens /cartel gangs/ asylum seekers (possibly a farce) only.

This is all thanks to California and no one doing anything about this Sanctuary City BS.

a reply to: andy06shake

So the taxpayer essentially foots the bill? You don't see any increase or other overheads on the horizon?

Again , they already get paid. Albeit for part time. But , that time is rotational. You should know all of this....

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: WarPig1939

It doesn't matter if signs get posted. The second a child gets shot what little good will Trump, and by extension the US, has left will go down the drain.

zay MUZT pozt zee signz !!

✔️🎦