The Caravan is Coming

originally posted by: DerBeobachter
The ancestors of illegal economic migrants and land robbers from an alien continent are afraid of a bunch of migrants from america, that heads towards their stolen country...

Priceless!

Must be the "global power", the "keeper of the world order" John Kornblum, former "U"S ambassador in Germany, spoke about on german TV(Phoenix) an hour ago...

German talking about a stolen country...priceless.

IMO this emphasizes how quickly we need to return control of places like Venezuela to the people/military. Or an outright invasion to restore democracy if needed. Either way, it is socialist killers like Maduro (and plenty of others) who cause these refugee crises.

If they have a legitimate claim of asylum, then we need to consider each case individually. But these people must be accounted for until that decision is made, to either repatriate them home or grant asylum. Since we don't have open borders, this is the only real sensible option. Not turning back asylum seekers, that would be anti-American. But solving the dictator problem South of the border and vetting/accountability for current asylum seekers. And providing tracking mechanisms to ensure immediate repatriation if asylum is denied.

Legislatively, we could "close the loophole" except laws don't have "loopholes." They are precisely as they're written/designed, without consideration of intent, so under current law refugees have the ability to petition the government for asylum.

originally posted by: fiverx313

originally posted by: Arnie123
IDK guys.

I think..this one I kind of feel for these people. They did travel a lomg way.

My issue is, MEXICO, this just shows they willingly choose to turn a blind eye.

mexico is disbanding the caravan and subjecting the people to administrative migratory procedure.

They are ?

😆

a reply to: c2oden

They aren't illegal if they are coming from Central or South America other than Mexico. They are legally allowed to come here and request asylum.

originally posted by: usernameconspiracy
a reply to: c2oden

They aren't illegal if they are coming from Central or South America other than Mexico. They are legally allowed to come here and request asylum.

And they shall stay in REFUGEE camps on the border then. If they cross into the country Then they are illegally crossing the border and subject to deportation.

Also A REFUGEE is supossed to stop in the first country they come to and request asylum by international law. you dont get to skip a whole country.

So reactionary. LOL

You know...we look at our southern Border problems all wrong. More walls/fences/dogs/drones/guns/agents/holding cells/gates/technology/vehichles etc.

But what we really need to do is find out why people want to leave mexico and south and central America, but really focus on Mexico and sprinkle a little bit of money and aid there. Actually talk to the Mexican Government. You know...stuff that would actually work.

Here's a quote from an informed source.

“When I hear ‘Secure the border,’ I think that’s great, but it’s not the solution,” said Carlos Gutierrez, who was commerce secretary under President George W. Bush. “We need laws that enable us to get the immigrant workers we need for the economy to work and do it in a legal way that doesn’t require employers to resort to a black market.”

Another thing is creating education programs in Mexico. There are already non profits there working on this. It would be really easy to do. Anther thing is an agreement with the Mexican government to help move some manufacturing there there doesnt' undercut American workers. Just saying.

We've tried stuff like this before just not in a good, sustainable way. LIke when Rudy Guliani's security firm went and worked in Mexico City. They did some good work but not long enough and not in a sustainable way.

Once the Wall is up and affective, much of the drug business south of the border will dry up. Then, maybe drug lords and their gangs of goons will actually be on the endangered list and their citizens can focus on making their own countries prosperous.

If you ever listen carefully to President Trump's speeches about the border, 9 out of 10 times he puts the scourge of illicit drugs first...then illegal immigration. That is the first step to helping those countries overrun with violence and corruption.

originally posted by: queenofswords

9 out of 10 times he puts the scourge of illicit drugs first...then illegal immigration. That is the first step to helping those countries overrun with violence and corruption.

LIES!!!

Keeping that border WIDE open is the best way to help Central America.

a reply to: queenofswords

No, as long as americans are willing to pay for drugs the cartels will find a way to provide. They have started using spud guns and drones. A wall isn't going to do jack squat to stop the flow of drugs.

Also, some people just really buy into the sales pitch of the american dream and you can't talk them out of going north to make it big.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: queenofswords

No, as long as americans are willing to pay for drugs the cartels will find a way to provide. They have started using spud guns and drones. A wall isn't going to do jack squat to stop the flow of drugs.

Also, some people just really buy into the sales pitch of the american dream and you can't talk them out of going north to make it big.

a spud gun is less payload than a truck so..there is a reduction. Maybe shoot a grenade back over th ewall to the jerkoff who fired a spud over.

originally posted by: yuppa
a spud gun is less payload than a truck so..there is a reduction.

Not if you shoot enough times to empty the contents of a truck.

Maybe shoot a grenade back over the wall to the jerkoff who fired a spud over.

If you could do that then why the need for a wall?

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: queenofswords

No, as long as americans are willing to pay for drugs the cartels will find a way to provide. They have started using spud guns and drones. A wall isn't going to do jack squat to stop the flow of drugs.

Also, some people just really buy into the sales pitch of the american dream and you can't talk them out of going north to make it big.

So then we should do it the DNC way and leave the borders WIDE open for the cartels, and offer incentives to all the little people to wager up to here.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Do it any way you like. It won't make a difference in the flow of drugs. That is what that post was about.

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: yuppa
a spud gun is less payload than a truck so..there is a reduction.

Not if you shoot enough times to empty the contents of a truck.

Maybe shoot a grenade back over the wall to the jerkoff who fired a spud over.

If you could do that then why the need for a wall?

uh huh...so i guess that truck load to be small to not be noticed and border patrol not seeing it right?

Really aren't we getting a little old for this dance?

Same story same bull#.

Give me something to watch and send me a ticket.

a reply to: yuppa

It was the same size as the one you brought up, which was supposed to just blaze on across the border with nobody noticing either.

a reply to: xuenchen

Let Em in. My lawn needs cutting.

If they are refugees, why don't they stop at the first country outside their borders for asylum?

originally posted by: fiverx313

originally posted by: Arnie123
IDK guys.

I think..this one I kind of feel for these people. They did travel a lomg way.

My issue is, MEXICO, this just shows they willingly choose to turn a blind eye.

mexico is disbanding the caravan and subjecting the people to administrative migratory procedure.

The caravan is disintegrating like the Chinese space station did.

originally posted by: Teikiatsu
If they are refugees, why don't they stop at the first country outside their borders for asylum?

It's all an act.

🎇🏺