It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Jesushere
What do you not understand about being held hostage, and violent hijackers trying to control the kidnapped?
Maybe Olson could not get to the other passengers to warn them of what her husband told her? Maybe Olson was found out by the terrorists and silenced? How many hijackings before 9/11 intensionally crashed the aircraft?
I find it odd conspiracists hardly ever target Renee May’s phone call.
originally posted by: Jesushere
a reply to: Zaphod58
Anyways not going to agree on this, next.
Floyd the Taxi driver claims he came across the highway with the people involved in the false flag and said he is in on it faking this event. Does this not bust the Government official narrative about 9/11.
Downed Light Poles
In the aftermath of the event at the Pentagon, there were five downed light poles that formerly stood beside the main highway and an exit ramp. This is confirmed by photographs and eyewitness testimony. Their former positions were on either side of a damage trail or path consistent with the passage of a large plane. The separation of the poles perpendicular to the damage trail is about 100 ft. The wingspan of a Boeing 757 is almost 125 ft. The fact that other poles close to the plane path were not clipped sets an upper limit of 13037 ft to the wingspan. Thus, the evidence is consistent with the wingspan of a Boeing 757. Photographs show that the impact point on the poles becomes progressively lower as the plane descends on approach to the Pentagon38.
Several witnesses (for example, Bright39, Khavkin40, Hagos41) reported that they saw the plane clip the poles. Others reported the plane clipped a telephone pole and utility pole guide. Witnesses such as Hemphill and Morin described a minor flash as the plane crossed the highway toward the Pentagon, indicating a collision with some object. A taxi cab driver, Lloyde England, reported that a severed pole damaged his windshield as his taxi traveled on the highway. Other witnesses support this much-maligned42 report. Some witnesses saw the light poles after they were downed. There are 22 citations of the plane hitting lamp poles and other objects to be found at this location.43 There are no witnesses who saw the poles suddenly destruct in the absence of a plane or who noticed damaged poles lying on the ground prior to the impact.
The downed light poles are in the “best evidence” category that a large plane flew low over the lawn from the highway toward the Pentagon. There is no sign of explosive damage; the poles appear to have been struck a massive horizontal blow which not only severed them at the ground and impact point but also bent them, as would be expected given their inertia.
The eyewitness and physical evidence provided by the downed light poles points to the passage through them of a large plane that hit the Pentagon a second or less later. This weighs against all the alternative theories except for explosives (bombs) for the physical damage, and a staged event is still needed to explain the witness testimony.
Requirement: Those who hold to the alternative theories must produce a credible alternative explanation for the downed light poles, in order to still claim that these theories are viable. If no credible evidence or explanation can be produced, these theories must be discarded.
Status: Requirement not fulfilled.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
Nvm. I keep forgetting why I don't get into these discussions anymore.
originally posted by: Fermy
originally posted by: craterman
No seats, no luggage, no bodies. Yeah, sure, it must have been a plane.
The passports !!! But what about the passports...
Groundhog Day again, same ol same ol "no interest in any other topic" poster.
The towers fell through the path of greatest resistance was a lie.
originally posted by: kyleplatinum
You have stated this a few time now. Please explain how this is a lie.
If the greatest resistance wasn't the 90+ undamaged/compromised floors (and core) below, then what was?
The towers both collapsed very quickly through the greatest path of resistance.
9/11 and the Science
of Controlled Demolition
According to Richard Gage: “To bring a building symmetrically down, what we have to do is remove the core columns.” But on 9/11 the stronger core columns came down last, which violates this supposed most fundamental rule of controlled demolition.