posted on Apr, 5 2018 @ 06:13 AM
a reply to: Outlier13
Well really no one on the first page had anything to add that wasn't based on "because I said so".
You're saying she should have posted evidence that Roseanne Barr is unreliable? I don't see any other claims being made in that post, so was that what
you meant? Apart from that she was just asking for someone to prove that the statistics are accurate, or that Trump is responsible for them, if they
can be proven to be accurate. So I'm not sure what you mean with the "because I said so" mentality? The point of the whole post was not to provide
content, it was to ask for content, i.e. evidence. I don't understand what you want evidenced about that? Which part of the post do you think might be
And I'm not trying to defend DJW001's questions, just saying that your video and EO don't prove that Trump has accomplished anything. That executive
order is just a plan. So, your evidence proves that Trump has signed an EO, I'm not denying that, but it remains to be seen how much he has reduced
trafficking. I don't have a problem with Trump in this case, that EO can't hurt at least.
Actually I wonder if that report on organized crime was delivered? Also, I feel like the real statistics for 2017 should be out by now.
Anyway, overall my biggest point is that no one in this thread says trafficking doesn't exist, and also that graph was fake. Those are my points.
a reply to: M5xaz
Well what's your reasoning for saying that HRC volunteered, for example? Of course Snopes is still better than nothing, at the very least they
provided some court documents.
(By the way, I don't know if either of your previous two posts were addressed at me. Sorry for not replying, if they were; they got removed before I
could read them.)