It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Mainstream Media Labels Pedophilia Sex-Trafficking a Conspiracy Theory. Are They Involved?.

page: 9
67
<< 6  7  8   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 4 2018 @ 09:05 PM
link   
a reply to: M5xaz

you should be ashamed of your unwillingness to be truthful and/or check your facts.

www.snopes.com...




posted on Apr, 4 2018 @ 09:14 PM
link   
a reply to: M5xaz


And, DJW001, you have no facts, NONE, nor do you know anyone in LEAs to make your uninformed statements


Lawyers defend their clients. That does not make them guilty of their clients' crimes. Please remember that when Trump's aids are being tried for treason. Evil people make pleas to your emotions to manipulate you. The OP is bogus. Memes do not alter the fact. If you want to prove otherwise, find real statistics. (Oh, and the link to the supposed EO was 404ed.)



posted on Apr, 4 2018 @ 09:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: M5xaz


And, DJW001, you have no facts, NONE, nor do you know anyone in LEAs to make your uninformed statements


Lawyers defend their clients. That does not make them guilty of their clients' crimes. Please remember that when Trump's aids are being tried for treason. Evil people make pleas to your emotions to manipulate you. The OP is bogus. Memes do not alter the fact. If you want to prove otherwise, find real statistics. (Oh, and the link to the supposed EO was 404ed.)


Trump's aids are going to be tried for treason?
edit on 2018-04-04T21:17:54-05:002201804America/Chicago4 by c2oden because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 4 2018 @ 09:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: fiverx313
a reply to: M5xaz

you should be ashamed of your unwillingness to be truthful and/or check your facts.

www.snopes.com...



What I provided IS FACTUAL
You should check your "sources", Snopes, seriously...



posted on Apr, 4 2018 @ 09:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: M5xaz
What I provided IS FACTUAL
You should check your "sources", Snopes, seriously...


snopes cites their sources so they can be read independently of their assessment.

you posted a meme and claimed it was factual.

snopes 1, you 0



posted on Apr, 4 2018 @ 09:41 PM
link   

This is NOT the Mud Pit!!!


All rules for polite political debate will be enforced.
Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (REVISED)

Go After the Ball, Not the Player!

You are responsible for your own posts.....those who ignore that responsibility will face mod actions.


and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!



posted on Apr, 5 2018 @ 06:13 AM
link   
a reply to: Outlier13

Well really no one on the first page had anything to add that wasn't based on "because I said so".

You're saying she should have posted evidence that Roseanne Barr is unreliable? I don't see any other claims being made in that post, so was that what you meant? Apart from that she was just asking for someone to prove that the statistics are accurate, or that Trump is responsible for them, if they can be proven to be accurate. So I'm not sure what you mean with the "because I said so" mentality? The point of the whole post was not to provide content, it was to ask for content, i.e. evidence. I don't understand what you want evidenced about that? Which part of the post do you think might be false?

And I'm not trying to defend DJW001's questions, just saying that your video and EO don't prove that Trump has accomplished anything. That executive order is just a plan. So, your evidence proves that Trump has signed an EO, I'm not denying that, but it remains to be seen how much he has reduced trafficking. I don't have a problem with Trump in this case, that EO can't hurt at least.

Actually I wonder if that report on organized crime was delivered? Also, I feel like the real statistics for 2017 should be out by now.

Anyway, overall my biggest point is that no one in this thread says trafficking doesn't exist, and also that graph was fake. Those are my points.

a reply to: M5xaz

Well what's your reasoning for saying that HRC volunteered, for example? Of course Snopes is still better than nothing, at the very least they provided some court documents.

(By the way, I don't know if either of your previous two posts were addressed at me. Sorry for not replying, if they were; they got removed before I could read them.)



new topics

top topics



 
67
<< 6  7  8   >>

log in

join