It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: carewemust
The students are now activists, and fair game for criticism... like all activists.
except they should be debated on the issues and not personally attacked. Only those with low intelligence would attack a child because he's protesting. In fact it's not really low intelligence, it's Fear. Fear and hate and maybe a mental illness would cause an adult to personally attack a kid? That's all I can think of. Mature, well adjusted adults don't do that.
Most of the comments directed toward hogg have been on his position being wrong, his outright lies, or his horrible attacks on people calling them curse words and killers.
Saying he was whining about his grades, although dumb, its not as big of deal as you are making it out to be. She was not attacking him for merely protesting, he made himself a target by calling anyone who has a different opinion as him as f*****ing killers that will take money to watch kids die.
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: amazing
except they should be debated on the issues and not personally attacked.
Running around calling for gun control is a personal attack on 300 million Americans.
They're mass shooters just waiting to happen.
That's not true. Just like Seat Belt laws aren't an attack on Drivers and Drinking laws aren't an attack on Drunks. There was a shooting, they were effected, they need to vent and we need to have a discussion. That's hardly taking away your rights.
“The pathetic f***ers that want to keep killing our children, they could have blood from children splattered all over their faces and they wouldn’t take action because they all still see those dollar signs,” Hogg said before describing the “exhaustion” he’s experienced as a result of his month-long stint as a political activist.
"I look forward to Hogg's apologies to Republicans ('sick f***ers'), Dana Loesch (she was 'hypocritical and disgusting' for criticizing Broward Sheriff Scott Israel), and Marco Rubio (he said Rubio was bribed by the NRA to give away children's lives)," he wrote. "You may not like what Ingraham said. You may disagree with it. I did. But it isn't remotely CLOSE to the level of viciousness with which Hogg has attacked people who disagree with him."
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: Grambler
Just waiting for all of the people denouncing Ingraham about how disgusting she was for attacking a kid on the thread about Hogg and that boycott to come on here and say MSNBC should also be boycotted.
Any second now....
And...what's wrong with that? Do tell. I pay attention to what's going on. I'm informed, but I don't watch any of those scumbags.
Well not watching them because you dont like them is a far cry for boycotting the sponsors on their show under the false pretense that its all about not wanting people to insult a kid.
For me I would boycott ingrahams sponsors because for me it is about her insulting a kid. That's me personally.
So then you would boycott Eichenwald as well?
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: carewemust
The students are now activists, and fair game for criticism... like all activists.
except they should be debated on the issues and not personally attacked. Only those with low intelligence would attack a child because he's protesting. In fact it's not really low intelligence, it's Fear. Fear and hate and maybe a mental illness would cause an adult to personally attack a kid? That's all I can think of. Mature, well adjusted adults don't do that.
Most of the comments directed toward hogg have been on his position being wrong, his outright lies, or his horrible attacks on people calling them curse words and killers.
Saying he was whining about his grades, although dumb, its not as big of deal as you are making it out to be. She was not attacking him for merely protesting, he made himself a target by calling anyone who has a different opinion as him as f*****ing killers that will take money to watch kids die.
But again, why would christian then turn that into a discussion on grades and college admissions? She's smart enough to debate him on the issues and call him out on that.
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: amazing
except they should be debated on the issues and not personally attacked.
Running around calling for gun control is a personal attack on 300 million Americans.
They're mass shooters just waiting to happen.
That's not true. Just like Seat Belt laws aren't an attack on Drivers and Drinking laws aren't an attack on Drunks. There was a shooting, they were effected, they need to vent and we need to have a discussion. That's hardly taking away your rights.
And it is OK to question them and oppose their viewpoint. That is OK.....and does not mean we are trying to silence them. Opposition opinions are just that....we do not all have to follow like lemmings over the cliff.
Think for yourself of the larger scale ramifications of their veiled message that is being driven by those older than them with a long standing political agenda.
Don't be a lemming.
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: Grambler
Just waiting for all of the people denouncing Ingraham about how disgusting she was for attacking a kid on the thread about Hogg and that boycott to come on here and say MSNBC should also be boycotted.
Any second now....
And...what's wrong with that? Do tell. I pay attention to what's going on. I'm informed, but I don't watch any of those scumbags.
Well not watching them because you dont like them is a far cry for boycotting the sponsors on their show under the false pretense that its all about not wanting people to insult a kid.
For me I would boycott ingrahams sponsors because for me it is about her insulting a kid. That's me personally.
So then you would boycott Eichenwald as well?
Yeah. Like I said, before this thread I never heard of him. He's a minor pundit. I would never watch him. Ever. Take that to the bank.
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: carewemust
The students are now activists, and fair game for criticism... like all activists.
except they should be debated on the issues and not personally attacked. Only those with low intelligence would attack a child because he's protesting. In fact it's not really low intelligence, it's Fear. Fear and hate and maybe a mental illness would cause an adult to personally attack a kid? That's all I can think of. Mature, well adjusted adults don't do that.
Most of the comments directed toward hogg have been on his position being wrong, his outright lies, or his horrible attacks on people calling them curse words and killers.
Saying he was whining about his grades, although dumb, its not as big of deal as you are making it out to be. She was not attacking him for merely protesting, he made himself a target by calling anyone who has a different opinion as him as f*****ing killers that will take money to watch kids die.
But again, why would christian then turn that into a discussion on grades and college admissions? She's smart enough to debate him on the issues and call him out on that.
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: amazing
except they should be debated on the issues and not personally attacked.
Running around calling for gun control is a personal attack on 300 million Americans.
They're mass shooters just waiting to happen.
That's not true. Just like Seat Belt laws aren't an attack on Drivers and Drinking laws aren't an attack on Drunks. There was a shooting, they were effected, they need to vent and we need to have a discussion. That's hardly taking away your rights.
And it is OK to question them and oppose their viewpoint. That is OK.....and does not mean we are trying to silence them. Opposition opinions are just that....we do not all have to follow like lemmings over the cliff.
Think for yourself of the larger scale ramifications of their veiled message that is being driven by those older than them with a long standing political agenda.
Don't be a lemming.
I'm not a lemming. Are you? I agree that there should be position discussions and view points. My whole point here is with that fake Christian Imgraham turning what was a golden opportunity to put in some good points in this discussion into instulting a minor about his grades and his college admissions...that's not opposition view points. If you think it is, you might be a lemming.
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: amazing
except they should be debated on the issues and not personally attacked.
Running around calling for gun control is a personal attack on 300 million Americans.
They're mass shooters just waiting to happen.
That's not true. Just like Seat Belt laws aren't an attack on Drivers and Drinking laws aren't an attack on Drunks. There was a shooting, they were effected, they need to vent and we need to have a discussion. That's hardly taking away your rights.
And it is OK to question them and oppose their viewpoint. That is OK.....and does not mean we are trying to silence them. Opposition opinions are just that....we do not all have to follow like lemmings over the cliff.
Think for yourself of the larger scale ramifications of their veiled message that is being driven by those older than them with a long standing political agenda.
Don't be a lemming.
I'm not a lemming. Are you? I agree that there should be position discussions and view points. My whole point here is with that fake Christian Imgraham turning what was a golden opportunity to put in some good points in this discussion into instulting a minor about his grades and his college admissions...that's not opposition view points. If you think it is, you might be a lemming.
That's not true.
Just like Seat Belt laws aren't an attack on Drivers and Drinking laws aren't an attack on Drunks.
There was a shooting,
they need to vent and we need to have a discussion.
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: amazing
except they should be debated on the issues and not personally attacked.
Running around calling for gun control is a personal attack on 300 million Americans.
They're mass shooters just waiting to happen.
That's not true. Just like Seat Belt laws aren't an attack on Drivers and Drinking laws aren't an attack on Drunks. There was a shooting, they were effected, they need to vent and we need to have a discussion. That's hardly taking away your rights.
And it is OK to question them and oppose their viewpoint. That is OK.....and does not mean we are trying to silence them. Opposition opinions are just that....we do not all have to follow like lemmings over the cliff.
Think for yourself of the larger scale ramifications of their veiled message that is being driven by those older than them with a long standing political agenda.
Don't be a lemming.
I'm not a lemming. Are you? I agree that there should be position discussions and view points. My whole point here is with that fake Christian Imgraham turning what was a golden opportunity to put in some good points in this discussion into instulting a minor about his grades and his college admissions...that's not opposition view points. If you think it is, you might be a lemming.
And yet, no outrage if this type over another media commentator that made an even more unjust and inflammatory insult to the kid.
It's hypocrisy....but I think you know that first hand.
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: Grambler
Just waiting for all of the people denouncing Ingraham about how disgusting she was for attacking a kid on the thread about Hogg and that boycott to come on here and say MSNBC should also be boycotted.
Any second now....
And...what's wrong with that? Do tell. I pay attention to what's going on. I'm informed, but I don't watch any of those scumbags.
Well not watching them because you dont like them is a far cry for boycotting the sponsors on their show under the false pretense that its all about not wanting people to insult a kid.
For me I would boycott ingrahams sponsors because for me it is about her insulting a kid. That's me personally.
So then you would boycott Eichenwald as well?
Yeah. Like I said, before this thread I never heard of him. He's a minor pundit. I would never watch him. Ever. Take that to the bank.
More deflecting. Just answer the simple question posited to you.
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: amazing
except they should be debated on the issues and not personally attacked.
Running around calling for gun control is a personal attack on 300 million Americans.
They're mass shooters just waiting to happen.
That's not true. Just like Seat Belt laws aren't an attack on Drivers and Drinking laws aren't an attack on Drunks. There was a shooting, they were effected, they need to vent and we need to have a discussion. That's hardly taking away your rights.
And it is OK to question them and oppose their viewpoint. That is OK.....and does not mean we are trying to silence them. Opposition opinions are just that....we do not all have to follow like lemmings over the cliff.
Think for yourself of the larger scale ramifications of their veiled message that is being driven by those older than them with a long standing political agenda.
Don't be a lemming.
I'm not a lemming. Are you? I agree that there should be position discussions and view points. My whole point here is with that fake Christian Imgraham turning what was a golden opportunity to put in some good points in this discussion into instulting a minor about his grades and his college admissions...that's not opposition view points. If you think it is, you might be a lemming.
And yet, no outrage if this type over another media commentator that made an even more unjust and inflammatory insult to the kid.
It's hypocrisy....but I think you know that first hand.
I agree. like I said, I've never even heard of this schmuck. I promise you that I will never, ever watch him until the day I die. YOu have my word on that.
Ingraham is the bigger problem...she's actually famous and has a following. She's supposed to be above this pettiness. She's a Christian....She has one of the top rated news shows behind only Maddow, Hannity and carlson.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: amazing
except they should be debated on the issues and not personally attacked.
Running around calling for gun control is a personal attack on 300 million Americans.
They're mass shooters just waiting to happen.
That's not true. Just like Seat Belt laws aren't an attack on Drivers and Drinking laws aren't an attack on Drunks. There was a shooting, they were effected, they need to vent and we need to have a discussion. That's hardly taking away your rights.
And it is OK to question them and oppose their viewpoint. That is OK.....and does not mean we are trying to silence them. Opposition opinions are just that....we do not all have to follow like lemmings over the cliff.
Think for yourself of the larger scale ramifications of their veiled message that is being driven by those older than them with a long standing political agenda.
Don't be a lemming.
I'm not a lemming. Are you? I agree that there should be position discussions and view points. My whole point here is with that fake Christian Imgraham turning what was a golden opportunity to put in some good points in this discussion into instulting a minor about his grades and his college admissions...that's not opposition view points. If you think it is, you might be a lemming.
So just to clarify, saying a kid is whining means you arent a real christian?
Wow.
When asked what specific measures he would implement if given the opportunity, Hogg begins to discuss mental-illness policy before arguing that it’s not his responsibility to formulate solutions: “I shouldn’t have to! I’m 17.”
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: amazing
except they should be debated on the issues and not personally attacked.
Running around calling for gun control is a personal attack on 300 million Americans.
They're mass shooters just waiting to happen.
That's not true. Just like Seat Belt laws aren't an attack on Drivers and Drinking laws aren't an attack on Drunks. There was a shooting, they were effected, they need to vent and we need to have a discussion. That's hardly taking away your rights.
And it is OK to question them and oppose their viewpoint. That is OK.....and does not mean we are trying to silence them. Opposition opinions are just that....we do not all have to follow like lemmings over the cliff.
Think for yourself of the larger scale ramifications of their veiled message that is being driven by those older than them with a long standing political agenda.
Don't be a lemming.
I'm not a lemming. Are you? I agree that there should be position discussions and view points. My whole point here is with that fake Christian Imgraham turning what was a golden opportunity to put in some good points in this discussion into instulting a minor about his grades and his college admissions...that's not opposition view points. If you think it is, you might be a lemming.
So just to clarify, saying a kid is whining means you arent a real christian?
Wow.
No that's not clear. Insulting a kid publicly about something NOT even related to the discussion at hand, shows that you aren't a real Christian. Let's be clear. It should all be about what would Jesus do Jesus wouldn't say "your dumb". Seriously. christians aren't supposed to insult kids like that. She admitted it was bad afterwards. Even she knew it was bad.