It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: purplemer
Cleaning our air? CO2 is not a contaminant. You guys are scary with your ignorance.
Aside from the fact there are literally thousands of pages of statistical data that support there is no such thing as man made global warming the easiest way to realize it is a conspiracy was simply this.
originally posted by: Greven
originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: Greven
The only peril facing us is from greedy govts, corporations and globalists devising ways to destroy our standard of living and by stealing from us in the most covert ways possible.
First, you decided that these entities are greedy and trying to destroy your standard of living.
Then, you decided that they would be doing that via global warming (taxes or whatever).
Out of necessity, you concluded that global warming must then be wrong.
Consequently, you embrace any topic that you think disproves global warming.
When you approach the topic from that angle, you will never get to the truth. This is true of many others who believe the same.
originally posted by: purplemer
a reply to: Outlier13
Aside from the fact there are literally thousands of pages of statistical data that support there is no such thing as man made global warming the easiest way to realize it is a conspiracy was simply this.
lolz
That is incorrect. Scientist have been studying it long before Al Gore came along.
originally posted by: Outlier13
originally posted by: purplemer
a reply to: Outlier13
Aside from the fact there are literally thousands of pages of statistical data that support there is no such thing as man made global warming the easiest way to realize it is a conspiracy was simply this.
lolz
That is incorrect. Scientist have been studying it long before Al Gore came along.
You're not understanding what I am referencing. I am not referencing "climate change". I am referencing the mythical conspiracy of the left known as "man made global warming". Al Gore and the political left perpetrated mass fraud on the American public by making false and inaccurate claims that somehow in the 258 years since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution that man alone has dramatically altered the entire biosphere and ecosystem of a 4.5 billion year old planet. That is beyond laughable.
Regarding the study of the Earth's climate both present and past scientists have been studying climate change on a global scale since they first began harvesting ice cores in 1957.
Regarding the study of the Earth's climate both present and past scientists have been studying climate change on a global scale since they first began harvesting ice cores in 1957.
Aside from the fact there are literally thousands of pages of statistical data that support there is no such thing as man made global warming the easiest way to realize it is a conspiracy was simply this.
If you are so sure of yourself why dont you get the thousands of pages of statistical data and write a peer reviewed paper on the subject. You cannot.
originally posted by: purplemer
originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: purplemer
Cleaning our air? CO2 is not a contaminant. You guys are scary with your ignorance.
Of course it can be considered a contaminant. At what point would you consider it such. Would you have to wait until CO2 levels where high enough that you had problems breathing or could you be prudent enough to put that arbitrary line in at a point before.
Incorrect. While papers are often critiqued after publication, the peer review process occurs before publication.
Peer review happens after the paper is editorially reviewed and published, by peers.
authorservices.wiley.com...
Peer review is designed to assess the validity, quality and often the originality of articles for publication. Its ultimate purpose is to maintain the integrity of science by filtering out invalid or poor quality articles.
From a publisher’s perspective, peer review functions as a filter for content, directing better quality articles to better quality journals and so creating journal brands
guides.lib.jjay.cuny.edu...
In academic publishing, the goal of peer review is to assess the quality of articles submitted for publication in a scholarly journal. Before an article is deemed appropriate to be published in a peer-reviewed journal, it must undergo the following process:
theconversation.com...
Most scientific journals, conferences and grant applications have some sort of peer review system. In most cases it is “double blind” peer review. This means evaluators do not know the author(s), and the author(s) do not know the identity of the evaluators. The intention behind this system is to ensure evaluation is not biased.
The more prestigious the journal, conference, or grant, the more demanding will be the review process, and the more likely the rejection. This prestige is why these papers tend to be more read and more cited.
library.sdsu.edu...
Peer review means that a board of scholarly reviewers in the subject area of the journal, review materials they publish for quality of research and adherence to editorial standards of the journal, before articles are accepted for publication.
originally posted by: purplemer
a reply to: Outlier13
Aside from the fact there are literally thousands of pages of statistical data that support there is no such thing as man made global warming the easiest way to realize it is a conspiracy was simply this.
People like you make me laugh. You dont have a clue do you. You are making stuff up. If you are so sure of yourself why dont you get the thousands of pages of statistical data and write a peer reviewed paper on the subject. You cannot.
Trot on.
I find it amazing the Earth was able to rebound from an asteroid strike which wiped out most of life on Earth and here the alarmist left stream media makes people believe the Earth will die from man's industrialization
But there you go. Why should I believe you? You might be right. But I have actual scientists and scientific organizations and college departments and thousands of papers telling me the there is a thing "man made global warming".
originally posted by: liejunkie01
a reply to: amazing
But there you go. Why should I believe you? You might be right. But I have actual scientists and scientific organizations and college departments and thousands of papers telling me the there is a thing "man made global warming".
Are they using adjusted numbers in all of those scientific organizations, college departments, and thousands of papers telling you that there is man made global warming?
Are they adjusting the numbers, or aren't they?