It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The US gubment makes deals to break them.
originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: Dfairlite
This is a very bad idea IMO. If this happens and Drupf still wants to talk to NK, why would they belief the USA will stick to what ever agreement we had? I say no Trump don’t do it.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: Dfairlite
This is a very bad idea IMO. If this happens and Drupf still wants to talk to NK, why would they belief the USA will stick to what ever agreement we had? I say no Trump don’t do it.
Yep.
originally posted by: angelchemuel
Has Trump visited a darkened room with the Men in Black?
Well his "hair" hasnt turned grey yet that we can tell. Both Bush and Obama's hair had turned grey something like 2 weeks after original inaugurations.
originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: Allaroundyou
Because NK is agreeing to give up their nukes. Iran only claimed they would stop pursuing, we already know they didn't.
The way things are going, the entire korean peninsula will be thriving by the time trump leaves. Iran will be a black hole. Pretty good reason for NK to keep talking to Trump.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: intrptr
Reminds me of Rome and Carthage..
Rome talked Carthage into disarming, disbanding their army and siege equipment trying to appease the Roman senate. Then Rome pressured them to give up there children before attacking when they refused to completely destroy the city.
originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: BlueAjah
How is that the opposite? Iran has complied with the deal 100% and now we are going to pull out for no reason other that Trumps hyperbole.
In this context, the IAEA’s reports have failed to include key information on a range of compliance issues, including centrifuge R&D, nuclear weaponization activities, IAEA access to military sites, illegal procurement efforts, and the exact amount of heavy water under its control. After the release of the latest report, the IAEA acknowledged that the agency had not inspected any Iranian military sites since the JCPOA’s implementation.
Thus, in late August, an anonymous IAEA official offered another troubling admission. Asked by Reuters about the IAEA’s failure to secure access to Iran’s military sites, the official cited the possibility that President Trump would use Tehran’s refusal as a rationale to abandon the JCPOA. “We just don’t want to give them an excuse to,” the official said. Effectively, the U.N. watchdog acknowledged that political considerations had interfered with its mission of serving as an independent and unbiased monitor of Iran’s nuclear activities.
While most of your statements in this post are questionable (or outright fabrications), I'll concentrate on the one most obvious lie.