It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Stormy Daniels’ ‘Super’ Dilated Pupils Spark Accusations She Was High

page: 9
22
<< 6  7  8    10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 03:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bearmonger
a reply to: BlueMule

You're right. Trump's affair 10 years ago with a porn star means I will forget why I voted for him and I'm all for the lefts agenda now. Bring on the open borders and the destruction of my country!


someone else that clearly dont keep up with # cause they really dont care.

it is not about the affair. not about the sex

its about the 130k 11 days before the election

whos money?
why 11 days before and not a year?
is the llc legit?

those are the issues. not banging some chick.

im sue you dont care about any of the above either.

was the 130k paid in an effort to sway the election?
of course you will say no but the fact is you dont know.
i dont know either but i want to know the facts. i do have my opinions though

if it had come out 11 days before the election that could have swayed people to vote against him.
THAT is the problem

pay her off. shut her up. try to sway it in my favor or at least stop it from going against me

did that happen???




posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 03:03 PM
link   
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

of course theyre suckers

and the lawyer used his own money to pay stormy??
hahahahahaha

sure he did



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 03:10 PM
link   
a reply to: TinySickTears

What lawyer in their right mind wouldn't pay their client's alleged mistress a few hundred thousand for no particular reason (as a "gift") a few days before an election? That's just being a nice person, not using money to sway public opinion before an election! If you think so you're just un-American and probably a communist who wants everyone to have their guns taken away.

Leftist scum!



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 03:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: TinySickTears

What lawyer in their right mind wouldn't pay their client's alleged mistress a few hundred thousand for no particular reason (as a "gift") a few days before an election? That's just being a nice person, not using money to sway public opinion before an election! If you think so you're just un-American and probably a communist who wants everyone to have their guns taken away.

Leftist scum!


you got me

the donald can not even find lawyers to work for him. lawyers he retained are leaving and this 1 lawyer forks over 130k of his own scratch.

hahahahahahahhaha



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 03:16 PM
link   
a reply to: howtonhawky



but i am willing to learn if you got some knowledge to share with me

Hey, I'm really not trying to be a dick..lol, but you are saying my opinion is is not relevant, while your's is. Fact is mine or your opinions are irrelevant in court..unless you're the judge, or an expert witness in a court proceeding.
The premise that she was on illicit drugs would be completely inadmissible, without corroborating evidence to back it up, such as a toxicology report, police report, extreme behaviour witnessed ..etc. None of that took place. Besides which, even if she was(unprovable) it doesn't really change the facts of said case, the lawyer has admitted giving her the $$..for what

edit on 28-3-2018 by vonclod because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 03:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: howtonhawky



but i am willing to learn if you got some knowledge to share with me

Hey, I'm really not trying to be a dick..lol, but you are saying my opinion is is not relevant, while your's is. Fact is mine or your opinions are irrelevant in court..unless you're the judge, or an expert witness in a court proceeding.
The premise that she was on illicit drugs would be completely inadmissible, without corroborating evidence to back it up, such as a toxicology report, police report, extreme behaviour witnessed ..etc. None of that took place.


yes i was pointing to that in the op with the i wonder if comment bout 60 min and drug test

i would call going on prime time talking bout 10yo affair with potus while on eye dilation meds after accepting 100g$ to shut up to be EXTREME BEHAVIOR.

but i am no judge am i?



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 03:36 PM
link   
a reply to: howtonhawky

Obviously not..good thing.



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 03:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: knowledgehunter0986
This was a major non-issue before it even started, so any subsequent events that unfold are just as relevant.

So in other words, who cares?

She could be strung out on coke with a white ring around her nostrils and drunk off a 5th of vodka drooling from her mouth for I all care. Unless of course gossip is your thing.


I agree. I don't care if it was yesterday or 50 years ago, I can give a rats as* who he's had consensual sex with. We all want government to stay out of our bedrooms, so why are we prying into his? Besides, the world has know for many many years that Trumps a man-whore, so why is this so surprising, news worthy or even relevant????? IMO shes just looking for 15 minutes of fame and some more money. Which is the reason most women have sex, date or marry very wealthy men for.



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 03:44 PM
link   
Why would a presidential candidate pay hush monies before an election??????

We are now in dumbville.

Why wouldn't they pay hush money if the goal was to win?

So is there even a case here besides some technicality that amounts to nothing cause trump did not sign the paper and the lawyer paid with own money.

I will say it again if you are entering into litigation don't be on illegal drugs if you intend to win.



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 03:47 PM
link   
a reply to: howtonhawky

60 f'ing minutes is not litigation



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 03:51 PM
link   
a reply to: howtonhawky

And we're back to square one. That's already been gone over. Twice I think. Are you the type of person that needs to call Directory Assistance to get the number for 911?



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 04:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: TinySickTears
if it had come out 11 days before the election that could have swayed people to vote against him.
THAT is the problem

pay her off. shut her up. try to sway it in my favor or at least stop it from going against me


If the payoff wasn't to cover up something illegal, then the payoff itself wasn't illegal, either. Of course it was intended to ensure a bombshell wasn't dropped days before the election... so what? Politics is not transparent, never has been, but the question "was it illegal?" is really the only one that matters.

I do find it fascinating that the same pundits who are taking this "OMG, it swayed the election by keeping a story out of the news, how horrendous!!!" stance are the same ones who flipped their snip over James Comey almost doing his job for once and sending a letter to Congress regarding the discovery of new Clinton emails 2 weeks prior to the election. That was actual, honest-to-God investigative action in a criminal probe, yet so many Clinton supporters screamed and hollered about it coming out immediately prior to the election...

Consistency matters.

I'll also say this much, so far this Stormy thing goes it doesn't seem to be having anywhere near the impact that was intended. In fact, "fart in a windstorm" comes to mind. We'll see where it ultimately goes, but this has all the earmarks of yet another failed attempt to attack Trump's position.



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 04:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: howtonhawky

60 f'ing minutes is not litigation


are you sure about your response?

it makes no sense to me

if you are making a point you should try harder



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 04:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: intrepid
a reply to: howtonhawky

And we're back to square one. That's already been gone over. Twice I think. Are you the type of person that needs to call Directory Assistance to get the number for 911?


That is because square 1 is correct and on point

she has no recoarse

you should have just took my word for that in the first place

so what is the number to 911? 2001?

What is your point?



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 04:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: burdman30ott6


If the payoff wasn't to cover up something illegal, then the payoff itself wasn't illegal, either.


this is also not correct.
its been stated many times in this thread.
i guess you and others are just not getting it.



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 04:56 PM
link   
a reply to: howtonhawky

You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. Your judgement is clouded by your opinion/politics
Cheers



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 05:03 PM
link   
a reply to: vonclod

again you have said nothing

in your horse scenario this would be considered animal cruelty to put a fence up between the horse and the water then bitch about how stupid the horse is

for goodness sakes make some sense man or woman



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 05:06 PM
link   
a reply to: TinySickTears

how about let us start fresh as if we have said nothing yet.

please make your point so i can understand it

you have a clean slate

go for it if you can



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 05:13 PM
link   
a reply to: howtonhawky

sorry my friend but if you dont understand it by now your not going to



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 05:15 PM
link   
You #s are modern day Kenneth Stars.


*golf clap*




top topics



 
22
<< 6  7  8    10  11 >>

log in

join