Stormy Daniels’ ‘Super’ Dilated Pupils Spark Accusations She Was High

a reply to: TinySickTears

You say you are all about truth and then you say and have said she was on drugs during the interview.

Yes she was on drugs during the interview.

Quit playing the fool.

Everyone agrees she was on drugs but legal or illegal is the only question.

That is the only factor besides light or brain damage

If the pupils are dilated due to an abnormal response, they may remain dilated even in the presence of sunlight or strong light. Injury to the brain and taking certain drugs are common causes of abnormally dilated pupils. Both medications and drugs of abuse can result in dilated pupils.Oct 24, 2017
Dilated Pupils (Mydriasis): Check Your Symptoms and Signs
www.medicinenet.com...

a reply to: howtonhawky

Well obviously I am not talking about prescription medicine.

a reply to: TinySickTears

Well drugs are bad umkay

point is that the eyes do not lie and unless she has a script it would be used against here in a court of law if she tries to sue to get more monies from him in court.

now the other line of thinking about the hush money coming right before the election is a different story and is a different case altogether and will not be affected by her deeds but only red tape that was not cut correctly by trump legal team may be it seems but even that is likely to be "trumped" by the fact he did not sign the agreement. different thread all together

Looks like in the end it will all be just an msm ratings ploy

also my main point still stands that if you are going to court and on illegal drugs during events presented to the court you will lose. imo

cops will use any and all legal profiling measures to arrest peeps in most cases they are bound to not ignore such

originally posted by: [post=23269209]howtonhawky

Yes she was on drugs during the interview.


Everyone agrees she was on drugs but legal or illegal is the only question.

Unless you can provide a toxicology report for Ms. Daniels as of the day of the interview, your assertion that “she was on drugs during the interview”, the veiled insinuation being that they were illegal drugs, is pure speculation on your part, regardless of what you claim “Everyone agrees”.

Publishing that inflammatory assertion as fact, as you are doing, could well border on libel.

Furthermore, your claim that you are not trying to defame or discredit Ms. Daniels, that you are merely pointing out that she “blew her case” based on her appearance (and make no mistake, it is clear that THAT is the sole basis of your assertion), is, at least disingenuous, on its face.

Unless you would care to identify exactly what “case” you are referring to with your assertion, the only case discussed in the televised interview with Ms. Daniels dealt with her assertion that she was made to sign an NDA in an attempt to buy her silence regarding her sexual encounter with Trump during his campaign for president. The President’s attorney at that time, has already acknowledged his involvement; an LLC he registered in Deleware was used to pay Ms. Daniels under the terms of the NDA.


Again, what “case” did she supposedly “blow”?

originally posted by: howtonhawky

Everyone agrees she was on drugs but legal or illegal is the only question.

Stupidest thing I've heard today. Pointed out in Harold & Kumar:

a reply to: howtonhawky

Lost me at drugs are bad
See ya

originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: howtonhawky

Lost me at drugs are bad

Could be. Prescription drugs have an expiration date.

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: howtonhawky

Lost me at drugs are bad

Could be. Prescription drugs have an expiration date.

only if you are doing them wrong

originally posted by: howtonhawky

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: howtonhawky

Lost me at drugs are bad

Could be. Prescription drugs have an expiration date.

only if you are doing them wrong

Well, then. That must mean you are on some kind of eye altering medication right now. Seeing as you are so familiar with them.

a reply to: howtonhawky

The point is that she blew the case!

LOLOLOLOL..wow, you just don't even have the faintest clue about how any of this works, rules of admissible evidence, and so on

originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: howtonhawky

The point is that she blew the case!

LOLOLOLOL..wow, you just don't even have the faintest clue about how any of this works, rules of admissible evidence, and so on

how what works??

a reply to: howtonhawky

Court of law.

a reply to: BlueMule

You're right. Trump's affair 10 years ago with a porn star means I will forget why I voted for him and I'm all for the lefts agenda now. Bring on the open borders and the destruction of my country!

originally posted by: Bearmonger
a reply to: BlueMule

You're right. Trump's affair 10 years ago with a porn star means I will forget why I voted for him and I'm all for the lefts agenda now. Bring on the open borders and the destruction of my country!

Except, I heard that about Obama. Not saying he was a great president, but...the borders aren't open and the country was NOT destroyed.

I find it ironic that some here are insulting her and calling her all kinds of names yet have no issue with the president paying to sleep with her a few months after his son was born. If she's a cracked out prostitute then what does that say about a married man paying to sleep with her? Apparently it only speaks to her and not the guy who was willing to pay for her.

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

the difference is what are they doing now?

one is scamming the ole relationship for bucks and the other is trying to run a country

do you want our country to fail

originally posted by: howtonhawky
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

the difference is what are they doing now?

one is scamming the ole relationship for bucks and the other is trying to run a country

do you want our country to fail

Are you saying the country will fail without Trump?

originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: howtonhawky

Court of law.

seems like it often goes the way of currency

are you beating round the bush bout your opinion that the interview is not relevant or even admissible

that seems premature

but i am willing to learn if you got some knowledge to share with me

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: howtonhawky
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

the difference is what are they doing now?

one is scamming the ole relationship for bucks and the other is trying to run a country

do you want our country to fail

Are you saying the country will fail without Trump?

nice response

i am saying that these are attempts to make it fail with trump

things will get better sooner if we all come together

a reply to: howtonhawky

I guess Trump using tax-payer money to pay for his near-weekly golf trips to his own resorts isn't considered a scam to you? Because that money (millions per visit) being used to pay for it is going straight into his bank account.

But Obama played golf too! Right?

Suckers.