It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Stormy Daniels’ ‘Super’ Dilated Pupils Spark Accusations She Was High

page: 7
22
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 11:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: howtonhawky

So does you not having your license.
Don't mean #. Definitely don't mean guilt.

And she wasn't in front of a cop

And I don't think you're correct. Dilated and frothing at the mouth? Sure
Too many meds out there can cause you to dilate. Are cops doctor's now?

What would me having or not having a license effect?

Again peep i do not just post stuff i make up and my statement that it gives probable cause is indeed testable. Present yoself in front of the law messed up and see if they react.

They are trained too look for such.

In the event of such they would be able to inquire if she is on any meds and if the answer is no then bam that is there way in.




posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 11:19 AM
link   
a reply to: howtonhawky

Dude. It's about venue. She was at 60 Minutes studio. Not being pulled over on the highway. What's so hard to understand about that?



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 11:20 AM
link   
a reply to: howtonhawky

Not having it is cause to investigate.

None of what you are saying means anything. She was not in front of the law and nobody knows if she was messed up.

You certainly don't. I know that much

It's just an attempt to discredit her



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 11:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: intrepid
a reply to: howtonhawky

Dude. It's about venue. She was at 60 Minutes studio. Not being pulled over on the highway. What's so hard to understand about that?



They all understand just fine.
Look at all the comments. Just pulling their trump 4d bull#.



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 11:24 AM
link   
a reply to: TinySickTears

not really trying to discredit her i am not

i am just pointing out that she discredited herself...

also i am pointing out that drugs and court cases do not mix if you are on them and trying to win.



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 11:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: howtonhawky
also i am pointing out that drugs and court cases do not mix if you are on them and trying to win.


Well open another ridiculous thread about that and then you might be closer to making any sense.



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 11:31 AM
link   
a reply to: howtonhawky

Ok.
What is your point though?
Everyone knows this
She was not in court. She was giving an interview.

I really don't understand

Uuuuhhh if she was flying into space she would be sidelined cause her meth pupils.



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 11:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Maybe her eye doctor had just dilated her eyes (with coke lol).


I doubt you'd do coke before such an interview, its counterproductive. I could see an Xanax to calm you down though. That's been used numerous times.



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 11:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: howtonhawky

Ok.
What is your point though?
Everyone knows this
She was not in court. She was giving an interview.

I really don't understand

Uuuuhhh if she was flying into space she would be sidelined cause her meth pupils.



Yes the interview will be part of the court.

If not by her than by the other.

The point is that she blew the case!



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 11:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: howtonhawky
also i am pointing out that drugs and court cases do not mix if you are on them and trying to win.


Well open another ridiculous thread about that and then you might be closer to making any sense.


no thanks

i feel as though my point has been made well enough.

no sense in beating a dead horse



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 11:37 AM
link   
I doubt she was sober when sleeping with Trump no matter how much he paid her.



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 11:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: howtonhawky

Not having it is cause to investigate.

None of what you are saying means anything. She was not in front of the law and nobody knows if she was messed up.

You certainly don't. I know that much

It's just an attempt to discredit her


Eh, not even "discredit her" - they all know she is telling the truth and he's lying his ass off again. He lies about everything). It's just punishment for speaking badly of dear leader.

Doesn't matter if you're the FBI, a poster on the board, Rex Tillerson or even the [former] leader/inventor of the "Alt-Right" - if you take a position against Trump on anything anywhere you will get bloodied bc that's what the mob does. You speak, you get punished, period.

And, boy, look-out, because if the "speaking out" involves upsetting President Putin, you can wake up dead as your punishment. That's how the Russian/International crime mob rolls.



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 11:53 AM
link   
a reply to: Scrubdog




he's lying his ass off again


I have not studied his statements much but i think you are likely making that part up.

Have you heard him say he did not sleep with her?

What is his lie in this case?



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 12:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: howtonhawky


The point is that she blew the case!


Perhaps you wish?

This “case” does not hinge upon whether or not Ms. Daniels had sex with Trump just after his wife gave birth to Trump’s child; sleazy as that is for both Daniels and Trump.

The sex doesn’t matter.

What ACTUALLY matters is whether or not Ms. Daniels was subsequently paid for her silence regarding the assignation...

Using Trump campaign funds OR funds authorized BY the Trump campaign.

Either action would be a violation of the law.

Attempting to obstruct that violation by imposing a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) could be charged as an attempt to obstruct and/or collude in the obstruction of justice.

And, as I previously pointed out, it is yet unclear whether Trump was the actual owner of the LLC that paid Ms. Daniels, a member/partner of the LLC, or the LLC’s client.

Each of those possible relationships has implications for Mr. Trump.

Lastly, if, as I pointed out previously, the LLC was not properly formed, or reported, the claim by the Trump administration and their attorney that Ms. Daniels is violation of the NDA contract could very well be a moot point in that the contract referred to may very well have been invalid.

Discredit Ms. Daniels all you want, if Trump is shown to have had any connection to that NDA, valid or not, it is that connection that will sink him, not Ms. Daniels, or her alleged pupils.

And for that, Donny has his attorney to thank.


edit on 28-3-2018 by Bhadhidar because: (no reason given)

edit on 28-3-2018 by Bhadhidar because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 12:15 PM
link   
a reply to: howtonhawky

Pornstar and drugs, could happen

One photo and hung drawn and quartered, seems harsh and a bit like a kangaroo court

I am also high right now as I write this but like Miss Stormy, who really cares?



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 12:16 PM
link   
a reply to: UpIsNowDown

I care..

If you share.


and

......


sharing is caring

a friend in need

something something indeed.


save the whales.



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 12:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Bhadhidar

Yes that is something different and likely why he did not sign it?

Again and for the last time i did not make the thread to discredit poor stormy.

She did it to herself...

I am bout the truth.



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 12:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: howtonhawky
a reply to: Bhadhidar

Yes that is something different and likely why he did not sign it?

Again and for the last time i did not make the thread to discredit poor stormy.

She did it to herself...

I am bout the truth.


Bull# you're about truth.
Your posts say otherwise

As money posts state it is not about the sex. It's about the payoff.
What do you not understand?



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 01:01 PM
link   
a reply to: TinySickTears




Your posts say otherwise

prove it or otherwise you are just mad bout da gurl

what exactly are you trying to prove here by now changing you comments

you have tried every way to skirt around the truth here that she was on drugs during the interview.

take a deep breath



posted on Mar, 28 2018 @ 01:09 PM
link   
a reply to: howtonhawky

I didn't change a single comment.

You say you are all about truth and then you say and have said she was on drugs during the interview.

The fact is you don't know that. None of us do. I also never said she wasn't on drugs. I said I don't know and also mentioned many prescription meds that dilate pupils.

You are the one claiming # as fact when you don't know. People seeking truth do not do that so why are you lying?

You re trying to smear her.

Also I am not upset. Nothing you could possibly say would get me upset.

What i am doing is having a debate. I'm giving my OPINION.
What you are doing is talking # and stating things as fact when you don't know.

Just admit it dude. It's ok

If I was doing that I would admit it



new topics




 
22
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join