It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Edumakated
easier to sway the public with the "scary looking" guns tho isnt it?
interesting how they dont care about those killed with handguns....
soon it will be "the ruskies want you to keep your assault rifles".....
They tried that angle already and it failed. They're just looking for an in any way they can. Once you get one type of semi-auto banned, you can make the case that they all should be banned. The current version of the "assault weapons ban" in Congress actually does ban virtually all semi-auto rifles and handguns.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Krazysh0t
It does not matter which is better Krazysh0t.
The point is that unless the rifle can fire more than one round, to one pull of the trigger, its a semi automatic firearm, no different than any other. Calling a civilian available AR-15 an assault rifle, is like calling a VW Camper Van a sports car. Its nonsensical, and makes no allowance for the clear differences between the two things.
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: DogStarIn1066
Alright then the kids should start fighting against obesity and deaths caused by don't text and driving as well. That kills way more people in the US daily then any mass shooting event and the numbers are on the rise. Repeal the Second Amendment is trending so i guess they are after all your guns. I'm not an american but i support the right to bear arms. Repealing the Second Amendment creates a precedence and who really believes it just stops there.
originally posted by: DogStarIn1066
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Edumakated
easier to sway the public with the "scary looking" guns tho isnt it?
interesting how they dont care about those killed with handguns....
soon it will be "the ruskies want you to keep your assault rifles".....
They tried that angle already and it failed. They're just looking for an in any way they can. Once you get one type of semi-auto banned, you can make the case that they all should be banned. The current version of the "assault weapons ban" in Congress actually does ban virtually all semi-auto rifles and handguns.
Who needs semi auto?
I can't hunt with one in my state. Most folks cannot shoot well with a bolt action. Your are most likely just shooting poorly at a faster rate.
originally posted by: cynicalheathen
a reply to: Krazysh0t
The length argument is pretty weak. I own a 16" barrel M4-gery that shoots accurately enough to hit 12" steel plates at 500 yards with iron sights. 5.56x45 isn't especially lethal past 150yards anyway. The round is intended to wound, not kill.
I also have several 8" plates set up at 25 yards and can reliably hit all targets with basic semi-auto pistols, rapid-fire, and swapping between targets. With several 15rd or less magazines, it's easy to keep up a good rate of fire. Reloading takes about a second. 10 round mags wouldn't make a huge difference. I used to own an old Lee-Enfield bolt-action, and I could keep up a pretty good rate of fire with only a 5 round magazine and charger clips.
It's not the gun, but the shooter that makes a shooting lethal.
originally posted by: Edumakated
originally posted by: DogStarIn1066
a reply to: Edumakated
I was an Army officer. An AR-15 pretty much does the same thing in semi as an M-16. Oh, and we never used a 16 on full auto. So, pretty much the same thing.
Try and keep up.
Appealing to authority does not make a factual argument. Doing practically the same thing IS NOT the same thing.
Just come out and say you guys want to ban all semi-auto firearms which is the implication.
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
I think this is an issue, that a lot of people really don't know much about different guns,
relevant research, etc.
My roommate not only does want to take all your guns, he didn't realize that "assault weapons" is an ill defined, political messaging tactic, not a real class of guns or type of gun.
a reply to: Gothmog
originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: DogStarIn1066
But their gunz make them feel all safe and warm.
originally posted by: DogStarIn1066
originally posted by: Edumakated
originally posted by: DogStarIn1066
a reply to: Edumakated
I was an Army officer. An AR-15 pretty much does the same thing in semi as an M-16. Oh, and we never used a 16 on full auto. So, pretty much the same thing.
Try and keep up.
Appealing to authority does not make a factual argument. Doing practically the same thing IS NOT the same thing.
Just come out and say you guys want to ban all semi-auto firearms which is the implication.
Ok, sure.
Ban them.
No need for them from my point of view.
I shot two deer this fall with a bolt action.
No second shot with either. Why do I need semi? I know how to shoot.
Also, I am an authority, as I served in the forces that defended you and our way of life. A "thank you for your service " might be nice.
Or are you now in favor of disrespecting military officers?
originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: DogStarIn1066
But their gunz make them feel all safe and warm.
Of course, which is what complicates this issue.
originally posted by: DogStarIn1066
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
The whole point is to prevent tyranny and be able to fight back. So, to answer your question, government.
I'm not taking a side in this debate. But liberals or gun control advocates have to engage that argument if they are serious. It's laid out by the framers of the Constitution.
a reply to: Agit8dChop
The government has atomic bombs. Tanks. Planes. What are you going to buy to stop that?
It is a weird way dream for some folks.
How are you going to fight your own government?
Not with a gun.
But with your voice, your vote, and your mind.
I have driven in an M-1 tank. You loose if you get in front of it.
"well then no guns are necessary because you can't fight back anyways."
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: DogStarIn1066
Alright then the kids should start fighting against obesity and deaths caused by don't text and driving as well. That kills way more people in the US daily then any mass shooting event and the numbers are on the rise. Repeal the Second Amendment is trending so i guess they are after all your guns. I'm not an american but i support the right to bear arms. Repealing the Second Amendment creates a precedence and who really believes it just stops there.