It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: DBCowboy
Should we let that same guy buy whatever book he wanted?
What books do you want to ban?
You didn’t answer my question. Should we let the homicidal maniac buy whatever book he wanted?
Only if the individual is physically and mentally capable of handing the responsibility that comes with freedoms.
So, we should do background checks for people who want to buy books?
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: DBCowboy
Should we let that same guy buy whatever book he wanted?
What books do you want to ban?
You didn’t answer my question. Should we let the homicidal maniac buy whatever book he wanted?
Only if the individual is physically and mentally capable of handing the responsibility that comes with freedoms.
So, we should do background checks for people who want to buy books?
I reported your post because it appears that a tween has hacked your account.
Do you want 2 year olds to vote?
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: DBCowboy
Should we let that same guy buy whatever book he wanted?
What books do you want to ban?
You didn’t answer my question. Should we let the homicidal maniac buy whatever book he wanted?
Only if the individual is physically and mentally capable of handing the responsibility that comes with freedoms.
So, we should do background checks for people who want to buy books?
I reported your post because it appears that a tween has hacked your account.
Do you want 2 year olds to vote?
Yes I do want 2 year olds to vote. I know you didn't ask me. Why you probably won't ask? Because the adults voted and decided that Hillary and Trump should run against each other. That was after having Obama and Romney run against each other. Tell me again, how a 2 year old could mess that up more than we did? LOL
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: DBCowboy
Should we let that same guy buy whatever book he wanted?
What books do you want to ban?
You didn’t answer my question. Should we let the homicidal maniac buy whatever book he wanted?
Only if the individual is physically and mentally capable of handing the responsibility that comes with freedoms.
So, we should do background checks for people who want to buy books?
I reported your post because it appears that a tween has hacked your account.
Do you want 2 year olds to vote?
I can give you examples of books banned or attempted to be banned in the United States, as I argued. As for books banned by the government, as per your goal-post widening, I'm not aware that there are any.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: DBCowboy
So I’m going to have to answer for you since you won’t.
I’m guessing you are saying we shouldn’t have background checks for people to have books. That means a known homicidal maniac should be able to get any book they want.
I’m also guessing you are saying that we SHOULD have at least some type of background check to make sure a known homicidal maniac doesn’t get any gun they want.
Therefore, you are admitting that books are not always interchangeable with guns in your argument. Therefore, you are admitting you were wrong to edit my post talking about not letting guns get into the wrong hands by substituting the word gun with book.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: DBCowboy
So I’m going to have to answer for you since you won’t.
I’m guessing you are saying we shouldn’t have background checks for people to have books. That means a known homicidal maniac should be able to get any book they want.
I’m also guessing you are saying that we SHOULD have at least some type of background check to make sure a known homicidal maniac doesn’t get any gun they want.
Therefore, you are admitting that books are not always interchangeable with guns in your argument. Therefore, you are admitting you were wrong to edit my post talking about not letting guns get into the wrong hands by substituting the word gun with book.
You've not entered the realm of the absurd, you've paid first/last months rent and live in a condo there.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
I can give you examples of books banned or attempted to be banned in the United States, as I argued. As for books banned by the government, as per your goal-post widening, I'm not aware that there are any.
I did not widen any goal post. I asked a specific question, as it relates to the US government, due to the constitutional basis of our individual rights. The constitution being a document that limits what the federal government can or cannot do.
So in this context, my question is quite relevant.
originally posted by: skunkape23
I've used stacked up phone books for target practice.
A .44 magnum would penetrate into the third Houston phone book.
Is book-shooting wrong? Maybe I am a bad person.
Do they still make phone-books?
Maybe I'm getting old.