It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Seekerof
Bush, by a landslide. Why? The Democrats nor the Independents have a viable enough candidate to beat him.
regards
seekerof
[Edited on 2-7-2003 by Seekerof]
Originally posted by onlyinmydreams
The 'real' Democratic heavyweights have all stayed out of this one, hoping to run in 2008 instead. In fact, some democrats were getting mad at Hillary Clinton for saying that she WOULD consider a run in 2008, as this implied that the Dems would lose for sure in 2004.
In 2008 the Democrats won't have to run against an incumbent President (Cheney will either be dead or cybernetic by then), so they will have much better chances at that time.... provided that they still have the same 'base' that they do now, which isn't necessarily so.
Originally posted by Fury
Ralph nader will take it all.
lmao
Originally posted by f16falcon
can any american explain if bill clinton can run again? is it 2 terms or 2 consecutive terms? b/c i heard someone on TV talking about this
If the Bush machine feels threatened (which I don't think they are), I expect another "incident" to draw public attention away from the rubberstamping, I mean election.
Originally posted by f16falcon
can any american explain if bill clinton can run again? is it 2 terms or 2 consecutive terms? b/c i heard someone on TV talking about this
Bush will not win...
Remember he lost the popular vote. He would have to pull off the miracle of the century to win.imo
Originally posted by Flinx
Bush will win for sure.
Besides all that, the candidate with the most campaign funds always wins. Bush is going to have the most money by far. We all know why.