It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: nwtrucker
So yes, I think China is the one going 'all in' and it's going to backfire.Not many hold that view, I admit.
I do. 100%.
The company I work for manufactures in China and we're feeling the pinch. Our newest factory is almost fully automated so we don't have to pay workers to do manual labor that robotics can handle like they do in other countries.
originally posted by: sunShines
When the US established diplomatic relation with China in the late 1970s there should have been a treaty. China want to buy planes from America? Fine. Sign a treaty first. Treaty says China buy planes from America and promises never to develop its own plane industry and compete with the US on the global plane market. China needed the US. The US didn't need China.
The more I see, the more I'm leaning to the view that China grew too fast, way too fast and is suffering as a result.
The first phase of the Sino-African policy—prior to the 1970’s, could be rightly categorized as being ideologically driven. If one were to look at relations between China and African countries’ relations, what emerges here is an ideological connection or influence. The situation in Algeria, Angola, Congo, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Rhodesia (Zimbabwe), Guinea, etc. including inter-party relations of ZAPU (Nkomo) and ZANU (Mugabe), the African National Congress (ANC) are all examples of the ideological influences of the Sino-African relations.
The second phase heralded in the 1970’s and 1980’s was a Sino-African relationship that partially got eclipsed because of the cold war. Even during this period, China’s connection to the continent, while quieter, was not completely extinguished. It was during this period that the emergence of China took an urgent and focused tone leading to Deng Xia Ping’s “Economic Transformation” push. Toward the end of this period, China renews its South-South Cooperation referred to since as the “Beijing Consensus” (posing China’s economic development model as an alternative, especially for developing countries—and rejecting the universality of the Washington Consensus.
Phase three of the Sino-African relations policy heralds the emergence of the current China policy regarding the continent and is punctuated by: a) the Beijing Consensus; b) continued South-South dialogue, and c) the formation of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation or FOCAC.
This third phase heralded the self-acknowledgement by China that the country needed several conditions to be fulfilled if it were to move forward in its push for economic transformation as envisaged in the second phase of this Sino-Africa development trajectory. By its own assessment, China needed:
1. Resources for its blossoming economy, namely, oil, minerals, timber, and other raw materials
2. A market for its manufactured goods
3. Reliable political allies for its “One China Policy”
To accomplish these goals (and satisfy the needs), China saw Africa and began propagating the continent as being rich in: a) culture, b) religion, c) social dynamism, d) energy, and e) as being a great opportunity for business. One needs to contrast this view to that of the West’s, which saw Africa, in most cases and justifiably, as: a) chaotic, b) conflict ridden, c) corrupt, and d) poor in wealth as well as in governance.
The company I work for manufactures in China and we're feeling the pinch. Our newest factory is almost fully automated so we don't have to pay workers to do manual labor that robotics can handle like they do in other countries.
originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: Willtell
Lots to lose for both sides. A little heat could be a good thing, though.