It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

No, you can't compare Larry Sinclair to Stormy Daniels

page: 3
18
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 24 2018 @ 07:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: dragonridr
Well I lost respect for you Donald Trump if your going to cheat at least make sure they are hotter then your wife. Stormy is mediocre at best though he did show better taste in Karen McDougal. She at least shows he has some taste. Is anyone truly shocked a millionaire is dating models and former playmates? Major slumming with a porn actress find it hard to believe he did that.


Remember before the elections there was a sort of tabloid story rumor that the Don hired either russian porn stars or prostitutes to meet him in his hotel and there were all sorts of crazy antics involved such as peeing all over the bed and pictures of obama or some such stuff amongst other things.

It was dismissed as just nonsense...but I think its time to revisit this. This president is...something else




posted on Mar, 24 2018 @ 08:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: Southern Guardian
a reply to: SaturnFX

Gosh it's like a hornets nest in here. Criticize the great one in office and you get a load of em' jumping on you. I hit a nerve.



They rush in screeching about how they don't care, nobody cares, also hillary!...every.single.time



posted on Mar, 24 2018 @ 08:44 AM
link   
a reply to: Southern Guardian

If Obama hasn't denied it, then you have no reason to deny it unless you were with Obama the weekend Larry says he was giving him BJs and doing coke and crack with him. What if Obama didn't deny it because Larry was telling the truth and Obama didn't want to open himself up to a defamation claim from Larry?

And, since Obama hasn't denied it and has never filed any defamation action in court to prove Larry was knowingly lying, Larry has no legal cause to compel a court to authorize discovery of evidence. Larry published a book about his claims, he called a press conference, too...it's not like he just quietly made an allegation and disappeared quickly after.

YES, I expected Obama to address Larry's claims. YES, I expected the media to ask Obama about them just like CNN asked Sarah Sanders about Stormy in a White House press briefing.

Despite your obvious adoration of Obama, he is not above being questioned and answering questions.

The fact is, all we have is circumstantial evidence to weigh -- and there is good circumstantial evidence in the retaliation Larry faced. I find his arrest at his press conference on a warrant issued out of Beau Biden's Delaware AG office to be VERY compelling circumstantial evidence. Plus, his arrest, alone, is evidence of retaliation. That's FAR MORE evidence than Stormy has to support her claim that Trump's lawyer is attempting to silence and intimidate her.

I believe Larry, 100%.

I also believe Stormy.

However, Stormy kept her allegations quiet throughout the entire election and never spoke up until AFTER she signed an NDA and after Trump was already elected. That diminishes her credibility in my mind. So, while I believe her claims, I'm also inclined to believe that Stormy and Trump are pulling a bit of a scam on us based on the circumstantial evidence.



edit on 3/24/2018 by MotherMayEye because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 24 2018 @ 08:51 AM
link   
a reply to: MotherMayEye

Because it's not possible that Obama sees this as too ridiculous to be believed and not even worthy of any reply right?



posted on Mar, 24 2018 @ 08:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: MotherMayEye

Because it's not possible that Obama sees this as too ridiculous to be believed and not even worthy of any reply right?


Then F- Obama. Pompous trash. He acts like his sh*t doesn't stink and it reeks.

***

ETA: AND that still doesn't explain why no one in the media ever questioned Obama about Larry. The media didn't want to put poor Obama in a position to either answer OR decline to answer; and they didn't want the public to weigh Larry's story for themselves.



edit on 3/24/2018 by MotherMayEye because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 24 2018 @ 09:10 AM
link   
a reply to: MotherMayEye

P.S. There is no circumstantial evidence for Larry Sinclair. None at all.



posted on Mar, 24 2018 @ 09:12 AM
link   
a reply to: MotherMayEye


Poo poo comments now.
Grow up.



posted on Mar, 24 2018 @ 09:12 AM
link   
"No, you can't compare Larry Sinclair to Stormy Daniels"


lol


I can do whatever I damn well please.




posted on Mar, 24 2018 @ 09:16 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

I have no interest in discussing this with you because you didn't even know who Larry Sinclair was a few days ago.

You are too uninformed to bother with.



posted on Mar, 24 2018 @ 09:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Sillyolme

I have no interest in discussing this with you because you didn't even know who Larry Sinclair was a few days ago.

You are too uninformed to bother with.

So why do you keep replying to my posts.
The fact that I never heard of Larry Sinclair is actually in my favor as to the validity of this YouTube claim.
Get real.



posted on Mar, 24 2018 @ 09:45 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Larry Sinclair, the guy who bought Nestle' and is debating banning Cotton. That guy? ysa



posted on Mar, 24 2018 @ 02:39 PM
link   
Ladies and gentlemen.... if this is true.....then







.....





....Trump had sex with a woman in 2006 and he was unfaithful to his wife!.....


Have I entered an alternative universe where liberals have some sort of moral compass all of a sudden???

Or is it that the Russia thing became a bit too embarrassing for them, so they need something else?
edit on 24/3/2018 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 24 2018 @ 04:41 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

The authoritarian left would have gay sex with dead alligators on a public bus filled with nuns if it got them more power and control.

Their moral compass swings faster than Kim Kardashian on Exstacy.






edit on 24-3-2018 by DBCowboy because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 24 2018 @ 04:52 PM
link   
a reply to: MotherMayEye


If Obama hasn't denied it,


Obama not denying what this guy claims is proof of nothing MotherMayEye.

The onus is on Larry. That's how it works in the real world.


I believe Larry, 100%.


And that belief is based on pure faith in Larry telling the truth. Nothing more. That's the standard you set.

You believe Stormy because the evidence is there, clear as day. You have no choice really.

Sorry I'm just in aw of your logic here.



posted on Mar, 24 2018 @ 05:01 PM
link   
Oh good lord this just gets better and better.

Stormy Daniels’ lawyer says evidence of affair with Trump is on DVD

I tell you what, all the porn sites will be rushing to get their hands on this. My good lord, this guy has got to be bluffing. It can't be this good.



posted on Mar, 24 2018 @ 05:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: Metallicus
Thank goodness we have a second thread on this topic that no one cares about. If I had billions of dollars I probably would have banged someone that I wasn't married to at some point in my life.

I don't care about this topic...what I am fascinated by is why YOU care?

Bill Clinton already made Presidential affairs a non-story and Trump wasn't even President when this supposedly happened. I find it hilarious that Obama might be a homosexual, but I really don't care regardless. Him sucking as President has nothing to do with his sexual preferences.


Incorrect. Bill Clinton provided the Right Wing with the material needed to push their moral superiority for many, many years.

Family values and all that...remember?

Now you have someone with a similar history leading the party, in the same position as Clinton, and all of the sudden the Right Wing becomes liberal on sex?

It's a matter of outright hypocrisy for me.

Oh, and whether or not you would have ex-marital relations is a matter of your own moral fiber, not how much money you have.



posted on Mar, 24 2018 @ 07:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Southern Guardian
Obama not denying what this guy claims is proof of nothing MotherMayEye.

The onus is on Larry. That's how it works in the real world.


I believe Larry, 100%.


And that belief is based on pure faith in Larry telling the truth. Nothing more. That's the standard you set.

You believe Stormy because the evidence is there, clear as day. You have no choice really.

Sorry I'm just in aw of your logic here.


Disagree, Larry is the ONLY one who has offered proof...his accusation.

If Larry's accusation was actionable in court, then Obama would be required to answer for it....and if he did not, then Larry's accusations would prevail.

I believe Larry.

You are correct, I believe Stormy because the evidence is strong.

Same reason I believe Larry.

Larry's unlawful arrest at his press conference on a warrant issued out of Beau Biden's Delaware AG office is the strongest circumstantial evidence I've ever heard to support claims otherwise unproven without a court order for evidentiary discovery.

And if Stormy Daniels was arrested on a warrant signed by Mike Pence's child's AG office, at a media engagement talking about her allegations, unlawfully imprisoned on BOGUS charges that were eventually dropped, denied her medication while incarcerated, smeared by the press, and then had government benefits terminated....

....I think you would be absolutely outraged and appropriately disgusted.

Don't even try to lie and say you wouldn't.

THAT is not appropriate recourse for defamation. Obama should have filed a civil complaint if Larry was lying.


****

But, Larry did not go to jail because he was lying, however, even if he did...that is still the grossest abuse of authority I've ever heard of and people really do deserve to hear the truth about how Joe Biden was selected as Obama's running mate.




edit on 3/24/2018 by MotherMayEye because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 24 2018 @ 07:16 PM
link   
a reply to: MotherMayEye


Disagree, Larry is the ONLY one who has offered proof...his accusation.


Yes, he has nothing to show for his claims. We're well aware of this.


You are correct, I believe Stormy because the evidence is strong.

Same reason I believe Larry.


Hold on. You admit to the fact that Larry has nothing more to offer than his accusation, but you claim you believe him based on the same reason as Stormy.... based on 'strong evidence'. But he has none. And you admitted it.

Circular logic I tell ya.



posted on Mar, 24 2018 @ 07:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: Southern Guardian
a reply to: MotherMayEye


Disagree, Larry is the ONLY one who has offered proof...his accusation.


Yes, he has nothing to show for his claims. We're well aware of this.


You are correct, I believe Stormy because the evidence is strong.

Same reason I believe Larry.


Hold on. You admit to the fact that Larry has nothing more to offer than his accusation, but you claim you believe him based on the same reason as Stormy.... based on 'strong evidence'. But he has none. And you admitted it.

Circular logic I tell ya.


The circumstances of Larry's arrest ARE something called 'circumstantial evidence.' That evidence suggests something called 'retaliation' has taken place due to something called 'consciousness of guilt.'

The relevant circumstances are as follows:

1. Larry was arrested AT the press conference he called at the National Press Club, in violation of his Constitutional rights. The topic of his press statement was Larry's accusations that he had oral sex and did coc aine and crack with Obama which was furnished by Obama's personal dealer.

2. The warrant used for his arrest was issued by the Delaware State Attorney General's Office -- and Beau Biden was the Delaware Attorney General, at the time, and responsible for the oversight behind the issuing of that warrant.

3. Joe Biden was named Obama's running mate about a month after Larry's arrest.

4. Larry denied the charges and claimed he had never stayed in a hotel in Delaware, and, in fact, all the charges against him were dropped.

5. While unlawfully incarcerated, Larry was denied prescribed medication in violation of his Constitutional rights.

I find that COMPELLING circumstantial evidence.

If you don't, then I think you are a very foolish partisan who doesn't have the capacity to 'get real' and has no business lecturing anyone about their logic...



edit on 3/24/2018 by MotherMayEye because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 24 2018 @ 07:33 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Are you saying liberals have no moral compass?
No you wouldn't label everybody like that I'm sure.




top topics



 
18
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join