It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

White House sources leak details from meeting where new anti-leaking edict was imposed

page: 1
14
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 10:08 AM
link   
www.rawstory.com...

Just a little ironic....




The White House is scrambling to stem a tide of leaks and rumors, White House sources told The Daily Beast this week. The news that White House leakers had leaked information about an effort to stop leakers came in the Beast‘s report on White House infighting over outgoing Communication Director Hope Hicks’ job.


I hope Kelly Ann gets the communication Director's job.

More winning....MAGA



(post by loam removed for political trolling and baiting)

posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 10:31 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 10:33 AM
link   
Why would ANY citizen think it was ok for ANY president to have confidential information leaked? I don't care who is in office if information is leaked it should be a mandatory 5 years. This is not whistle blowing. It is illegally releasing information.



posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 10:34 AM
link   
a reply to: olaru12

A little ironic?
Heck, I need a napkin due to the irony being so thick and juicy.

Leakers leak anti-leaking meeting.
It could be the title for a Dr. Suess book.
Thanks for the dig



posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 10:39 AM
link   
a reply to: JAY1980

No doubt lawlessness exists on both sides.

But only one of those sides openly sees and advocates that as a virtue.


edit on 22-3-2018 by loam because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 10:42 AM
link   
Now this is my type of news bit.




posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 10:47 AM
link   
a reply to: olaru12

Welp...

The corrupt people in Washington don't want their gravy train to end.

Its how they all became millionaires on the course of a few years off 175k a year.

Surprised so many are ok with that.



posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 10:55 AM
link   
It is time to polygraph the whole damned bunch. Submit or resign!



posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 11:00 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 11:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: JAY1980

No doubt lawlessness exists on both sides.

But only one of those sides openly sees and advocates that as a virtue.



I am so tired of this quantifying. It's like saying, "I'm not racist but...." Both sides are corrupt. Period. No quantifying needed.



posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 11:02 AM
link   
More like gossip. What a soap opera.

By the way, they never leak real secrets, up there.

The difference between gossip and leaks? Look how bad they want Assange and Snowden. They leaked. The Gubment gets really pissed when real leaks happen.



posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 11:03 AM
link   
a reply to: intrepid

Uncomfortable with the distinction that one side doesn't see it as a problem?

Resist.




posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 11:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: intrepid

Uncomfortable with the distinction that one side doesn't see it as a problem?



Nope. Tired of people justifying wrongdoing.



posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 11:08 AM
link   

originally posted by: intrepid
Nope. Tired of people justifying wrongdoing.


Says the man who loves this "news bit".


edit on 22-3-2018 by loam because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 11:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: buddah6
It is time to polygraph the whole damned bunch. Submit or resign!


I totally agree and that includes the twitter in chief!!



posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 11:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: intrepid


originally posted by: intrepid
Nope. Tired of people justifying wrongdoing.


Says the man who loves this "news bit".



It's ironic. What's not to like? It's hilarious. I dig the funny.




posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 11:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: intrepid

Uncomfortable with the distinction that one side doesn't see it as a problem?

Resist.



I'm not sure why you think other people have to account for or argue against your strawman fallacies.

I think it's funny and ironic, as another member stated.



posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 12:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: the owlbear
a reply to: olaru12

A little ironic?
Heck, I need a napkin due to the irony being so thick and juicy.

Leakers leak anti-leaking meeting.
It could be the title for a Dr. Suess book.
Thanks for the dig


How many leaks can a leaker leak if a leaker could leak leaks.



posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 12:51 PM
link   
We have leaks of information
We have leaks in formation
We have leaks to keep us under sedation
We have leaks to devide our nation
So many leaks to cause frustration
Leaks to deceive
Leaks to further greed
How many leaks can there be
How many leaks until we are free?

My Dr. Suess attempt....







 
14
<<   2 >>

log in

join