It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Wall Street Journal Publishes Stormy Daniels Polygraph Rusults Back Her Story

page: 2
25
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 04:53 PM
link   
For those that say she was paid off (I think $150,000) all she has to do is show the check. Pretty easy. Stormy show us your shut the hell up check.

I mean if that is the REAL problem, then why can't she show the check? Maybe they paid her in Trump MAGA hats?




posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 04:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Sublimecraft




Or is this different because a penis and vagina is involved in the deceptive conduct?

That just adds a bit of spice to the deceptive conduct , deceptive conduct in itself is not new for this President.


He has the right to be deceptive or silent here.....its called the 5th.



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 04:55 PM
link   
I'm still curious as to why any of this matters? Shouldn't she have tried this money grab when he was still a private citizen, or are we just going to over look the issue of this being politically motivated?

We really don't know the details of Trumps marriage. Maybe he has an open marriage, maybe the two are swingers, or maybe they like this kind of thing. We don't know, but what I do know is that the same people that freely gave Bill and Monica a pass when it was no longer "News Worthy" and the same people who failed to look in to the Hillary Huma story, seem hell bent on making this a massive topic. Here's an idea why don't we go after Jeffery Tobin since he and his wife have an open marriage, or the 14% of the US population (according to Playboy) that have similar arrangements.

I find this whole Stephanie C situation kind of funny, but also kind of scary. On one hand it's funny how people are making it such a big deal in the media when many in the media practice the same thing (after a certain war correspondent was killed in Iraq this got covered by a few people that were affected by his death, and that's when the cat was let out of the bag). On the other hand it's scary that it's being used to drown out any real news story that is coming out.

So let me ask my simple question again:
"Why does any of this matter?"



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 04:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Fools

The payment is not in question , Trumps lawyer admitted it and there's a copy of the agreement online.
The real problem is that you don't know that.



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 05:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: kurthall
I am glad she took the test. I bet trump will still say fake news, but would not himself take a polygraph.



A polygraph exam taken by adult-film star Stormy Daniels in 2011 supported her account of an affair she said she had with Donald Trump five years earlier, The Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday.




The newspaper obtained reports of the exam, which Daniels took on May 19, 2011. The polygraph showed she truthfully said she had unprotected sex with Trump around July 2006.



Ewww TMI. Anyway, everyone who was outraged over Clintons certainly should be over this. True these tests are not 100% accurate, nor can you use them in court. They are still a very useful tool in investigations. I believed her before this, but now I am certain. Again If you were outraged over Clinton lying, certainly you can understand why I am outraged he is lying about this. He thinks we are all stupid, and ignorant. Well I am not.

Everything from Trump U, to his 3 marriage which he cheated on every single one of his three wives. Stormy, after only being married for a year and she just had his third child.

The, man has 0 respect for Vows, Marriage, women or truth. Also unprotected, with a porn star??? Wow. Smart.

www.msn.com...





You say “ewww tmi”

As far as we know, a cigar wasn’t in question here.

Plus Stormy>>Monica.

Good day.




posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 05:02 PM
link   
Welcome to the ATS gossip column, courtesy of the oh-so-perfect left!

(And also the leftwing media for giving them their every talking point)

edit on 20-3-2018 by knowledgehunter0986 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 05:02 PM
link   
Porn star bangs billionaire non POTUS.
Billionaire pays porn star to sign an NDA.
Porn star breaks contract after billionaire becomes POTUS.

Who is the bad person here?

What would we expect of a porn star?

Brains? Not necessarily.
Ethics? Nope.



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 05:03 PM
link   
a reply to: kurthall

Did she Have a Tack in Her Bra During the Questioning > ,Hmm......



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 05:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy
Porn star bangs billionaire non POTUS.
Billionaire pays porn star to sign an NDA.
Porn star breaks contract after billionaire becomes POTUS.

Who is the bad person here?

What would we expect of a porn star?

Brains? Not necessarily.
Ethics? Nope.


Bingo.



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 05:09 PM
link   
unprotected clips from the donald

pretty gross



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 05:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Fools

The payment is not in question , Trumps lawyer admitted it and there's a copy of the agreement online.
The real problem is that you don't know that.



Is there a payment or a non disclosure agreement? You are not being clear.



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 05:15 PM
link   
a reply to: Imhere

It is Hard for me to Fathom that at the time , a Playboy Billionaire was Bangin' a Porn Star , when he could have Basically had Any Woman of Non ill-repute Around the Planet .Is this Story just Another Media Fiction , or is there some kind of Hard Evidence to Back it Up ?



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 05:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Imhere

It is Hard for me to Fathom that at the time , a Playboy Billionaire was Bangin' a Porn Star , when he could have Basically had Any Woman of Non ill-repute Around the Planet .Is this Story just Another Media Fiction , or is there some kind of Hard Evidence to Back it Up ?


I think it's a weird story and there's more to all of it than meets the eye.



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 05:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: kurthall
Anyway, everyone who was outraged over Clintons certainly should be over this.


Trump did this in the Oval Office on the tax payer budget with an intern of the United States government and then lied about it under oath? Where is that written?



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 05:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: Logarock

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Sublimecraft




Or is this different because a penis and vagina is involved in the deceptive conduct?

That just adds a bit of spice to the deceptive conduct , deceptive conduct in itself is not new for this President.


He has the right to be deceptive or silent here.....its called the 5th.


The 5th isn't even required here. No crime was committed and no liability to the US tax payer has surfaced. This is a non-story.



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 05:26 PM
link   
a reply to: kurthall


. The other issue is that the POTUS, is lying to the American people over and over again about this.....Calling it Fake News, when its not fake news....The man says it about anything negative about him.





That's the American 'immediate problem' right now
summed up



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 05:30 PM
link   
a reply to: kurthall


Who cares? Maybe the people who read the Daily Star in the checkout lane? Statistics say that most men over 50 have been unfaithful at least once. For wealthy men, the percentage is probably really high.

That's why only desperate Anti-Trump CNN and MSNBC devote meaningful time to this non-story. (BTW.. the talking heads on CNN and MSNBC have done far worse things in life.)



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 05:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: Cassi3l
a reply to: kurthall


. The other issue is that the POTUS, is lying to the American people over and over again about this.....Calling it Fake News, when its not fake news....The man says it about anything negative about him.





That's the American 'immediate problem' right now
summed up


Unfortunately an "immediate problem" for Democrats is that they can't do any better for the country than President Trump is doing. I don't think they even have a "Trump beater" in mind for 2020.



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 05:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
I wonder who conducted the polygraph and why it was conducted...way back in 2011???


Following up....


Daniels, whose legal name is Stephanie Clifford, submitted to the lie detector test as part of her interview with a magazine in 2011, an article which was later killed by the publication in an effort to bury her story.


Link


That's pretty interesting!

Any interview she gave would simply be her words and safe to publish. Since when do interviewers give polygraphs to the people they interview?

...AND THEN WHEN THEY GET A POLYGRAPH THAT SAYS SHE IS TELLING THE TRUTH....

...They don't publish it.

Why give a polygraph if they weren't going to publish the interview ANYWAY if she passed it?

Makes no sense. The entire *scandal* is just too weird. Now we have a polygraph from FIVE years before he ran for POTUS?

****

ETA: I mean, no other news source has polygraphed her before publishing her allegations....and Trump is actually POTUS now!

edit on 3/20/2018 by MotherMayEye because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 05:38 PM
link   
Party of 'Family Values' y'all.




top topics



 
25
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join