It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: conspiracy nut
a reply to: Vector99
no but you want it to be ok because 2 wrongs make a right? obama got away with it so should trump? how about if true we prosecute both of them?
originally posted by: conspiracy nut
a reply to: Vector99
no but you want it to be ok because 2 wrongs make a right? obama got away with it so should trump? how about if true we prosecute both of them?
originally posted by: YouSir
a reply to: xuenchen
Ummm...why would anybody care about this...?
Can you point to one vote that was swayed...?
Can you tell me why we should be concerned that a company used information that people posted on a public platform freely and willingly...to analyze trends...?
Do any of you actually even use Facebook...for reals...?
This is a big yawn...who the eff cares moment...wake me when you actually find something newsworthy...
YouSir
originally posted by: Arnie123
Oh man, this isn't good for the lefrist. So much for that angle, lmfao.
As always, S+F
hen Trump adviser Jared Kushner bragged to Forbes about his role in steering the Trump campaign to victory, he emphasized the merits of its unique data operation. “We brought in Cambridge Analytica,” he said, referring to the Robert Mercer-backed analytics company. “We basically had to build a $400 million operation with 1,500 people operating in 50 states, in five months.” The relationship was lucrative for the firm, too: Between July 29 and December 12 of last year, the Trump campaign reportedly paid Cambridge Analytica $5.9 million, according to Federal Election Commission data. But on Wednesday, after the Daily Beast reported that its C.E.O., Alexander Nix, had reached out to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange with an offer to help release Hillary Clinton’s missing e-mails, Team Trump moved to distance itself from the company.
originally posted by: Scrubdog
originally posted by: Arnie123
Oh man, this isn't good for the lefrist. So much for that angle, lmfao.
As always, S+F
I prefer to believe Jared Kushner's answer BEFORE Fecebook and Cambridge became so suspect: www.vanityfair.com...
hen Trump adviser Jared Kushner bragged to Forbes about his role in steering the Trump campaign to victory, he emphasized the merits of its unique data operation. “We brought in Cambridge Analytica,” he said, referring to the Robert Mercer-backed analytics company. “We basically had to build a $400 million operation with 1,500 people operating in 50 states, in five months.” The relationship was lucrative for the firm, too: Between July 29 and December 12 of last year, the Trump campaign reportedly paid Cambridge Analytica $5.9 million, according to Federal Election Commission data. But on Wednesday, after the Daily Beast reported that its C.E.O., Alexander Nix, had reached out to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange with an offer to help release Hillary Clinton’s missing e-mails, Team Trump moved to distance itself from the company.
Of COURSE AFTER it all started to stink, we hear of the "distance" put between the campaign and Cambridge, and yet, somehow Mike Flynn got on the payroll of Cambridge, Bannon was VP, that's just a bit "odd" is it not?
I think Jared happened to be telling the truth when he was bragging, and that this "distance" is all now being created out of necessity.
originally posted by: xuenchen
newsflash
FB Terms of Service
and
Data Policy
read and weep 📵
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: xuenchen
Adam Schiff has found a new (non-worthwhile) cause to pursue! He's convinced that the Trump campaign broke laws, and if necessary, will subpoena FaceBook's Mark Zuckerberg to tell all the goodies to Congress.
www.cbsnews.com...
originally posted by: conspiracy nut
a reply to: Vector99
no but you want it to be ok because 2 wrongs make a right? obama got away with it so should trump? how about if true we prosecute both of them?
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: xuenchen
Adam Schiff has found a new (non-worthwhile) cause to pursue! He's convinced that the Trump campaign broke laws, and if necessary, will subpoena FaceBook's Mark Zuckerberg to tell all the goodies to Congress.
www.cbsnews.com...
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: xuenchen
Adam Schiff has found a new (non-worthwhile) cause to pursue! He's convinced that the Trump campaign broke laws, and if necessary, will subpoena FaceBook's Mark Zuckerberg to tell all the goodies to Congress.
www.cbsnews.com...
I can't wait to see who gives him an epic beatdown.